| Literature DB >> 34218596 |
Jihye Yu1, Woojin Kim1, Yoon Kyung Chang2, Tong-Soo Kim3, Sung-Jong Hong4, Hye-Jin Ahn2, Ho-Woo Nam2, Dongjae Kim1.
Abstract
We find out the clusters with high toxoplasmosis risk to discuss the geographical pattern in Gyodong-myeon and Samsan-myeon of Ganghwa-gun, Cheorwon-gun, and Goseong-gun, Korea. Seroepidemiological data of toxoplasmosis surveyed using rapid diagnostic tests for the residents in the areas in 2019 were analyzed to detect clusters of the infection. The cluster was investigated using the SaTScan program which is based on Kulldorff's scan statistic. The clusters were found with P-values in each region analyzed in the program, and the risk and patient incidence of specific areas can be examined by the values such as relative risk and log likelihood ratio. Jiseok-ri and Insa-ri were found to be a cluster in Gyodong-myeon and Seokmo-ri was the cluster in Samsan-myeon. Yangji-ri and Igil-ri were found to be a cluster in Cheorwon-gun and Madal-ri and Baebong-ri were the cluster in Goseong-gun. This findings can be used to monitor and prevent toxoplasmosis infections occurring in vulnerable areas.Entities:
Keywords: Cheorwon-gun; Ganghwa-gun; Goseong-gun; RDT; Toxoplasmosis; cluster; resident
Year: 2021 PMID: 34218596 PMCID: PMC8255494 DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2021.59.3.251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Parasitol ISSN: 0023-4001 Impact factor: 1.341
Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii-specific antibodies in the residents’ sera detected using IgM-RDT and IgG-RDT in Ganghwa-gun, Cheorwon-gun, and Goseong-gun in 2019
| Location | No. of sera | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Eaxamined | IgM-positive (%) | IgG-positive (%) | |
| Ganghwa-gun | |||
| Gyodong-myeon | 255 | 3 (1.2) | 58 (22.7) |
| Samsan-myeon | 299 | 4 (1.3) | 98 (32.8) |
|
| |||
| Cheorwon-gun | 683 | 8 (1.2) | 130 (19.0) |
|
| |||
| Goseong-gun | 306 | 5 (1.6) | 109 (35.6) |
Clusters detected from Gyodong-myeon and Samsan-myeon in Ganghwa-gun by maximum allowed window in 2019
| Max window | Cluster | Location | Case | LLR | RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gyodong-myeon | ||||||
| 25% | 1 | Jiseok-ri, Insa-ri | 19 | 4.47 | 2.07 | 0.024 |
| 2 | Dongsan-ri | 6 | 0.22 | 1.29 | 0.996 | |
| 15% | 1 | Insa-ri, Jiseok-ri | 19 | 4.56 | 2.07 | 0.016 |
| 2 | Dongsan-ri | 6 | 0.22 | 1.29 | 0.980 | |
|
| ||||||
| Samsan-myeon | ||||||
| 25% | 1 | Seokmo-ri | 27 | 9.56 | 2.21 | <0.001 |
| 2 | Seokpo-ri | 14 | 0.54 | 1.27 | 0.761 | |
| 15% | 1 | Seokpo-ri | 14 | 0.54 | 1.27 | 0.379 |
Clusters detected from Cheorwon-gun by maximum allowed window in 2019
| Max window | Cluster No. | Location | Case | LLR | RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25% | 1 | Yangji-ri, Igil-ri | 27 | 4.91 | 1.89 | 0.013 |
| 2 | Saengchang-ri, Dochang-ri | 18 | 0.78 | 1.34 | 0.745 | |
| 3 | Daema-ri | 20 | 0.31 | 1.19 | 0.948 | |
|
| ||||||
| 15% | 1 | Yangji-ri, Igil-ri | 27 | 4.91 | 1.89 | 0.010 |
| 2 | Saengchang-ri, Dochang-ri | 18 | 0.78 | 1.34 | 0.697 | |
| 3 | Daema-ri | 20 | 0.31 | 1.19 | 0.928 | |
Clusters detected from Goseong-gun by maximum allowed window in 2019
| Max window | Cluster No. | Location | Case | LLR | RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25% | 1 | Madal-ri, Baebong-ri | 16 | 3.62 | 1.79 | 0.050 |
| 2 | Jukjeong-ri | 12 | 0.53 | 1.29 | 0.847 | |
| 3 | Chodo-ri | 17 | 0.01 | 1.03 | 0.998 | |
|
| ||||||
| 15% | 1 | Madal-ri, Baebong-ri | 16 | 3.62 | 1.79 | 0.042 |
| 2 | Jukjeong-ri | 12 | 0.53 | 1.29 | 0.785 | |
Fig. 1Toxoplasmosis clusters in Ganghwa-gun by maximum window size in 2019. (A) showed the cluster of Gyodong-myeon and (B), that of Samsan-myeon. The higher the relative risk, the red the darker.
Fig. 2Toxoplasmosis clusters in Cheorwon-gun by maximum window size in 2019. The higher the relative risk, the red the darker.
Fig. 3Toxoplasmosis clusters in Goseong-gun by maximum window size in 2019. The higher the relative risk, the red the darker.