Peter M Kistler1, David Chieng2, Ivaylo R Tonchev3, Hariharan Sugumar2, Aleksandr Voskoboinik2, Lorin A Schwartz3, Alex J McLellan4, Sandeep Prabhu2, Liang-Han Ling2, Ahmed Al-Kaisey5, Ramanathan Parameswaran5, Robert D Anderson5, Geoffrey Lee5, Jonathan M Kalman6. 1. The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: Peter.kistler@baker.edu.au. 2. The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 3. Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 4. The Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 5. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 6. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to report P-wave morphology (PWM) from a series of paraseptal (PS) atrial tachycardia (AT), revise then prospectively evaluate a simplified PWM algorithm against a contemporary consecutive cohort with focal AT. BACKGROUND: The 2006 PWM algorithm was useful in predicting the origin of focal AT. An updated algorithm was developed given advances in multipolar 3-dimensional mapping, potential limitations of PWM in separating PS sites, and a renewed interest in the P-wave in mapping non-pulmonary vein triggers. METHODS: The PWM from a consecutive series of 67 patients with PS AT were analyzed. PS sites included were coronary sinus ostium, perinodal, left and right septum, septal tricuspid annulus, superior mitral annulus, and noncoronary cusp. Next the P-wave algorithm was revised and prospectively evaluated by 3 blinded assessors. RESULTS: The P-wave for PS sites was neg/pos (n = 50), iso/pos (n = 10), or isoelectric (n = 4) in lead V1 (96%). The P-wave algorithm was modified and prospectively applied to 30 consecutive patients with focal AT who underwent successful ablation. Foci (n = 30) originated from the right atrium (33.3%), left atrium (30%), and PS (36.7%). Using the PW algorithm, the correct anatomic location was identified in 93%. Incorrect interpretation of the terminal positive P-wave component (n = 3) and initial negative P-wave deflection (n = 1) in lead V1 misidentified 4 paraseptal cases. CONCLUSIONS: The revised PWM algorithm offers a simplified and accurate method of localizing the responsible site for focal AT. The P-wave remains an important first step in mapping atrial arrhythmias.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to report P-wave morphology (PWM) from a series of paraseptal (PS) atrial tachycardia (AT), revise then prospectively evaluate a simplified PWM algorithm against a contemporary consecutive cohort with focal AT. BACKGROUND: The 2006 PWM algorithm was useful in predicting the origin of focal AT. An updated algorithm was developed given advances in multipolar 3-dimensional mapping, potential limitations of PWM in separating PS sites, and a renewed interest in the P-wave in mapping non-pulmonary vein triggers. METHODS: The PWM from a consecutive series of 67 patients with PS AT were analyzed. PS sites included were coronary sinus ostium, perinodal, left and right septum, septal tricuspid annulus, superior mitral annulus, and noncoronary cusp. Next the P-wave algorithm was revised and prospectively evaluated by 3 blinded assessors. RESULTS: The P-wave for PS sites was neg/pos (n = 50), iso/pos (n = 10), or isoelectric (n = 4) in lead V1 (96%). The P-wave algorithm was modified and prospectively applied to 30 consecutive patients with focal AT who underwent successful ablation. Foci (n = 30) originated from the right atrium (33.3%), left atrium (30%), and PS (36.7%). Using the PW algorithm, the correct anatomic location was identified in 93%. Incorrect interpretation of the terminal positive P-wave component (n = 3) and initial negative P-wave deflection (n = 1) in lead V1 misidentified 4 paraseptal cases. CONCLUSIONS: The revised PWM algorithm offers a simplified and accurate method of localizing the responsible site for focal AT. The P-wave remains an important first step in mapping atrial arrhythmias.