Literature DB >> 34217005

Redundancy between spectral and higher-order texture statistics for natural image segmentation.

Daniel Herrera-Esposito1, Leonel Gómez-Sena2, Ruben Coen-Cagli3.   

Abstract

Visual texture, defined by local image statistics, provides important information to the human visual system for perceptual segmentation. Second-order or spectral statistics (equivalent to the Fourier power spectrum) are a well-studied segmentation cue. However, the role of higher-order statistics (HOS) in segmentation remains unclear, particularly for natural images. Recent experiments indicate that, in peripheral vision, the HOS of the widely adopted Portilla-Simoncelli texture model are a weak segmentation cue compared to spectral statistics, despite the fact that both are necessary to explain other perceptual phenomena and to support high-quality texture synthesis. Here we test whether this discrepancy reflects a property of natural image statistics. First, we observe that differences in spectral statistics across segments of natural images are redundant with differences in HOS. Second, using linear and nonlinear classifiers, we show that each set of statistics individually affords high performance in natural scenes and texture segmentation tasks, but combining spectral statistics and HOS produces relatively small improvements. Third, we find that HOS improve segmentation for a subset of images, although these images are difficult to identify. We also find that different subsets of HOS improve segmentation to a different extent, in agreement with previous physiological and perceptual work. These results show that the HOS add modestly to spectral statistics for natural image segmentation. We speculate that tuning to natural image statistics under resource constraints could explain the weak contribution of HOS to perceptual segmentation in human peripheral vision.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational modeling; Higher-order statistics; Natural image statistics; Segmentation; Texture

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34217005      PMCID: PMC8363589          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.984


  68 in total

1.  Visual responses in monkey areas V1 and V2 to three-dimensional surface configurations.

Authors:  J S Bakin; K Nakayama; C D Gilbert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping.

Authors:  Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Texture segregation and orientation gradient.

Authors:  M S Landy; J R Bergen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  A new framework for understanding vision from the perspective of the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Li Zhaoping
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms.

Authors:  J Malik; P Perona
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Possible functions of contextual modulations and receptive field nonlinearities: pop-out and texture segmentation.

Authors:  Anita M Schmid; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Higher order image structure enables boundary segmentation in the absence of luminance or contrast cues.

Authors:  Elizabeth Zavitz; Curtis L Baker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration.

Authors:  Christopher R Fetsch; Alexandre Pouget; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  V A Lamme
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Spatial cue reliability drives frequency tuning in the barn Owl's midbrain.

Authors:  Fanny Cazettes; Brian J Fischer; Jose L Pena
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.