| Literature DB >> 34216490 |
Sandra Pfeiffer1, Peter Sandler1, Marianne Raith1, Mariona Pascal2,3, Rosa Maria Munoz-Cano3,4, Clara San Bartolome2,3, Katharina Nöbauer5, Santiago Quirce6, Ebrahim Razzazi-Fazeli5, Margarete Focke-Tejkl7, Katja Sterflinger8, Ines Swoboda1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: allergy diagnosis; indoor allergens; mold allergy; recombinant allergens; ulocladium chartarum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34216490 PMCID: PMC9290848 DOI: 10.1111/all.14999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Allergy ISSN: 0105-4538 Impact factor: 14.710
FIGURE 1Identification and characterization of IgE‐reactive proteins from Ulocladium chartarum. (A) Nitrocellulose‐blotted proteins from U. chartarum were exposed to two pools of sera [pool 1: sera 1, 2, 45–47, and 74; pool 2: sera 3–4, 13–14, 28–31, 34–36, and 58–61] from mold‐allergic patients. IgE‐reactive proteins identified by mass spectrometry are marked with A, B, and C; strongly stained but unidentified bands are marked with D, E, and F. Molecular weight markers are indicated in the left margins. (B) Determination of the IgE‐binding capacity of the recombinant allergens rUlo c 1, rUlo c 2, and rUlo c 6 by ELISA using sera from mold‐allergic patients. Results are displayed as mean OD values, and standard deviations from two technical replicates are indicated as error bars in the bar charts. The red line represents the cutoff value, which was calculated from the mean OD values plus two times the standard deviation of sera from three non‐allergic patients. Sera that gave OD values above 3.0 are marked with an asterisk (*). (C) Inhibition immunoblot: Blotted proteins of U. chartarum protein extracts were exposed to pools of sera (rUlo c 1: sera 25–27, 42, and 78; rUlo c 2: sera 15, 28–32, and 57; rUlo c 6: sera 3–4, 13–14, 28–31, 34–36, and 58–61) that had been pre‐incubated with rUlo c 1, rUlo c 2, or rUlo c 6 or, for control purposes, with buffer only. Molecular weight markers are indicated in the left margins. Arrows point to reduction in IgE binding to natural Ulo c 1, Ulo c 2, and Ulo c 6 after pre‐incubation with the recombinant proteins
FIGURE 2IgE cross‐reactivity between the major fungal allergens rUlo c 1 and rAlt a 1. (A) Two micrograms of the recombinant allergens were separated by SDS‐PAGE, blotted onto nitrocellulose, and exposed to a pool of sera (25–27, 42, and 78) from mold‐allergic patients, which had been pre‐incubated with rUlo c 1 or Alt a 1 or, for control purposes, with the non‐relevant allergen rBet v 1 or with buffer only. Molecular weight markers are indicated in the left margins. (B) Basophil activation of rUlo c 1 and rAlt a 1 was determined by measuring the expression of CD63 by flow cytometry after incubation of the whole blood from eight Alternaria‐sensitized patients (patients 13–16, 18, 21, 22, and 24) and from two non‐atopic control individuals (control 1 and 2) with increasing allergen concentrations. The percentage of CD63‐positive basophils (y‐axis), based on the total amount of basophils, is displayed against the concentration of the applied allergen (x‐axis)