| Literature DB >> 34216256 |
Anyi Liang1, Shanshan Jia2, Fei Gao1, Xiaoxu Han1, Minghang Pei3, Yi Qu4, Junyan Xiao1, Chan Zhao5,6, Meifen Zhang7,8.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Changes of choroidal circulation throughout the disease course of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease and the clinical significance remain unclear. Choriocapillary vascular density (CC VD) measured by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) were compared in different disease stages of VKH and its correlation with other parameters was analyzed, aiming to explore their clinical relevance.Entities:
Keywords: Choriocapillary vascular density; Disease stage; Optical coherence tomography angiography; Visual acuity; Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34216256 PMCID: PMC8523392 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05238-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ISSN: 0721-832X Impact factor: 3.117
Fig. 1Pictures demonstrating the segmentation before and after manual correction. Red arrows: locations of erroneous segmentation
Fig. 2Illustration of choriocapillary vascular density measurement. Top: segmentation standard. Area between 2 red lines stands for choriocapillaris. Bottom: vascular density measurement. The total area of the yellow circle is the selected area (SA, mm2); signals highlighted in yellow within the circle stands for blood flow area (FA, mm2); black within the circle indicates area without blood flow signal. CC VD is calculated as FA/SA (%). BRM: Bruch’s membrane
Fig. 3Illustration of subfoveal choroidal thickness measurement. SFCT is measured as the vertical distance indicated by the red star. RPE: retinal pigment epithelium
Fig. 4Comparisons of CC VD and SFCT between VKH and NCs. CC VD decreased and SFCT increased in VKH patients compared to NCs
Fig. 5Demonstration of representative images of CC VD measurement (from the same eye of the same patient)
CC VD, SFCT, and LogMAR BCVA in VKH and NCs
| Parameters | Acute uveitic stage ( | Convalescent stage ( | Chronic anterior recurrent stage ( | Normal control ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC VD (%) | 58.26 ± 0.84 (38.3, 72.8) | 64.85 ± 0.33 (54.7, 74.3) | 62.78 ± 0.70 (53.4, 72.7) | 66.37 ± 0.41 (57.8, 75.0) |
| SFCT (μm) | 497.11 ± 19.12 (163, 800) | 299.80 ± 8.33 (80, 690) | 364.49 ± 18.06 (162, 642) | 218.30 ± 6.91 (85,421) |
| logMAR BCVA | 0.32 ± 0.03 (− 0.13, 1.10) | 0. 11 ± 0.02 (− 0.10,1.15) | 0.19 ± 0.04 (0.00, 1.00) | NA |
All the values were presented as mean ± standard error (minimum, maximum)
Fig. 6Dynamic changes of CC VD, SFCT, and LogMAR BCVA over different disease stages of VKH. CC VD increased with uveitis resolution and decreased during anterior uveitis recurrence. SFCT decreased with uveitis resolution and increased during anterior uveitis recurrence. LogMAR BCVA decreased with uveitis resolution and increased during anterior uveitis recurrence
Comparison between patients with and without histories of anterior uveitis recurrence
| History of anterior uveitis recurrence | Number of patients | CC VD (%) | SFCT (μm) | LogMAR BCVA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 33 | 63.72 ± 4.35 (54.8, 71.8) | 309.92 ± 109.98 (124, 571) | 0.08 ± 0.19 (− 0.09, 0.98) |
| Negative | 30 | 66.06 ± 3.65 (54.8, 72.4) | 310.95 ± 108.85 (85, 690) | 0.03 ± 0.13 (− 0.10, 0.70) |
| Difference | NA | − 2.43 ± 0.75 (− 3.82, − 0.87) | − 1.03 ± 20.23 (− 41.11, 39.04) | 0.05 ± 0.03 (− 0.02, 0.11) |
| NA | 0.97 | 0.102 |
All the values were presented as mean ± standard error (minimum, maximum)
The bold data mean that the p values are significant (<0.05)
Correlation analyses between CC VD, SFCT, and logMAR BCVA in VKH patients
| Stage | 3 stages | Acute | Convalescent | Anterior recurrent | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC VD | SFCT | CC VD | SFCT | CC VD | SFCT | CC VD | SFCT | ||
| BCVA | − | 0.096 | − | − 0.19 | − 0.046 | − 0.093 | 0.059 | − 0.068 | |
| 0.124 | 0.103 | 0.594 | 0.276 | 0.708 | 0.67 | ||||
| CC VD | − | − | 0.007 | − 0.142 | |||||
| 0.923 | 0.352 | ||||||||
The bold data mean that the p values are significant (<0.05)