Literature DB >> 34215731

Charge and discharge profiles of repurposed LiFePO4 batteries based on the UL 1974 standard.

Hsien-Ching Chung1,2.   

Abstract

Owing to the popularization of electric vehicles worldwide and the development of renewable energy supply, Li-ion batteries are widely used from small-scale personal mobile products to large-scale energy storage systems. Recently, the number of retired power batteries has largely increased, causing environmental protection threats and waste of resources. Since most of the retired power batteries still possess about 80% of their initial capacity, their second use becomes a possible route to solve the emergent problem. Safety and performance are important when using these second-use repurposed batteries. Underwriters Laboratories (UL), a global safety certification company, published the standard for evaluating the safety and performance of repurposed batteries, i.e., UL 1974. In this work, the test procedures are designed according to UL 1974, and the charge and discharge profile datasets of the LiFePO4 repurposed batteries are provided. Researchers and engineers can use the characteristic curves to evaluate the quality of the repurposed batteries. Furthermore, the profile datasets can be applied in the model-based engineering of repurposed batteries, e.g., fitting the variables of an empirical model or validating the results of a theoretical model.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34215731     DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00954-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Data        ISSN: 2052-4463            Impact factor:   6.444


  6 in total

1.  Nanotubular metal-insulator-metal capacitor arrays for energy storage.

Authors:  Parag Banerjee; Israel Perez; Laurent Henn-Lecordier; Sang Bok Lee; Gary W Rubloff
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Solar fuels via artificial photosynthesis.

Authors:  Devens Gust; Thomas A Moore; Ana L Moore
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  Second life batteries lifespan: Rest of useful life and environmental analysis.

Authors:  Lluc Canals Casals; B Amante García; Camille Canal
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 4.  Enabling silicon for solar-fuel production.

Authors:  Ke Sun; Shaohua Shen; Yongqi Liang; Paul E Burrows; Samuel S Mao; Deli Wang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Long-Cycling Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Battery (AORFB) toward Sustainable and Safe Energy Storage.

Authors:  Bo Hu; Camden DeBruler; Zayn Rhodes; T Leo Liu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Evaluating the cost and carbon footprint of second-life electric vehicle batteries in residential and utility-level applications.

Authors:  Dipti Kamath; Siddharth Shukla; Renata Arsenault; Hyung Chul Kim; Annick Anctil
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 7.145

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.