| Literature DB >> 34215680 |
Marie Siwicki1, Nicolas A Gort-Freitas2, Marius Messemaker1, Ruben Bill1, Jeremy Gungabeesoon1, Camilla Engblom1, Rapolas Zilionis2,3, Christopher Garris1, Genevieve M Gerhard1, Anna Kohl1, Yunkang Lin1, Angela E Zou1, Chiara Cianciaruso1,4, Evangelia Bolli1,4, Christina Pfirschke1, Yi-Jang Lin1, Cecile Piot1, John E Mindur1, Nilesh Talele5, Rainer H Kohler1, Yoshiko Iwamoto1, Mari Mino-Kenudson6, Sara I Pai7, Claudio deVito4,8, Thibaud Koessler9,10,11, Doron Merkler4,8, Alexander Coukos12, Alexandre Wicky12, Montserrat Fraga13,14, Christine Sempoux15, Rakesh K Jain5, Pierre-Yves Dietrich9,10,11, Olivier Michielin12, Ralph Weissleder1,2, Allon M Klein2, Mikael J Pittet16,4,9,10,11.
Abstract
Immunotherapy is revolutionizing cancer treatment but is often restricted by toxicities. What distinguishes adverse events from concomitant antitumor reactions is poorly understood. Here, using anti-CD40 treatment in mice as a model of TH1-promoting immunotherapy, we showed that liver macrophages promoted local immune-related adverse events. Mechanistically, tissue-resident Kupffer cells mediated liver toxicity by sensing lymphocyte-derived IFN-γ and subsequently producing IL-12. Conversely, dendritic cells were dispensable for toxicity but drove tumor control. IL-12 and IFN-γ were not toxic themselves but prompted a neutrophil response that determined the severity of tissue damage. We observed activation of similar inflammatory pathways after anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapies in mice and humans. These findings implicated macrophages and neutrophils as mediators and effectors of aberrant inflammation in TH1-promoting immunotherapy, suggesting distinct mechanisms of toxicity and antitumor immunity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34215680 PMCID: PMC8845079 DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abi7083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Immunol ISSN: 2470-9468