| Literature DB >> 34215320 |
Catia Cavicchi1, Abderrahim Oussalah2, Silvia Falliano1, Lorenzo Ferri1, Alessia Gozzini1, Serena Gasperini3, Serena Motta3, Miriam Rigoldi4, Giancarlo Parenti5, Albina Tummolo6, Concetta Meli7, Francesca Menni8, Francesca Furlan8, Marta Daniotti9, Sabrina Malvagia10, Giancarlo la Marca10,11, Céline Chery2, Pierre-Emmanuel Morange12, David Tregouet13, Maria Alice Donati9, Renzo Guerrini1,14, Jean-Louis Guéant2, Amelia Morrone15,16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of epigenetics in inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) is poorly investigated. Epigenetic changes can contribute to clinical heterogeneity of affected patients but could also be underestimated determining factors in the occurrence of IEMs. An epigenetic cause of IEMs has been recently described for the autosomal recessive methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria, cblC type (cblC disease), and it has been named epi-cblC. Epi-cblC has been reported in association with compound heterozygosity for a genetic variant and an epimutation at the MMACHC locus, which is secondary to a splicing variant (c.515-1G > T or c.515-2A > T) at the adjacent PRDX1 gene. Both these variants cause aberrant antisense transcription and cis-hypermethylation of the MMACHC gene promotor with subsequent silencing. Until now, only nine epi-cblC patients have been reported.Entities:
Keywords: CpG island; Epi-cblC; Expanded newborn screening (NBS); Methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria; Promoter hypermethylation; Secondary epimutation; cblC disease; cblC type
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34215320 PMCID: PMC8254308 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-021-01117-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Epigenetics ISSN: 1868-7075 Impact factor: 6.551
Pathogenic variants identified in the MMACHC/PRDX1 genes of epi-cblC patients
| Pt | Italian origin | Diagnosis (age) | Variant 1 | Origin of variant 1 | Variant 2 | Origin of variant 2 | Epimutation in | Age at | Onset |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Central | C/B (10 d) | Paternal | Maternal | Het | 10 y | Early | ||
| 2 | Central | NBS (6 d) | Paternal | Maternal | Het | 8 y | Early | ||
| 3 | Southern | C/B (16 d) | Paternal | Maternal | Het | 11 y | Early | ||
| 4a | Southern | C/B (2 m) | Maternal | Paternal | Het | ND | Early | ||
| 5 | Northern | C/B (2 m) | Paternal | Maternal | Het | 10 y | Early | ||
| 6 | Northern | C/B (6 m) | Paternal | Maternal | Het | 6 y | Early | ||
| 7 | Southern | NBS (1 m) | Paternal | Maternal | Het | 7 y | Early | ||
| 8 | Southern | C/B (1 m) | Maternal | Paternal | Het | 18 y | Early | ||
| 9 | Northern | NBS (4 d) | Maternal | Paternal | Hetb | 2 y | Early | ||
| 10 | Northern | C/B (63 y) | ND | ND | Het | 75 y | Late | ||
| 11 | Central | NBS (4 d) | Paternal | Maternal | Hom | 7 y | Early |
C/B, diagnosis of methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria performed after a clinical/biochemical assessment; d, days; m, months; het, heterozygous; hom, homozygous; NBS, diagnosis of methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria performed by expanded newborn screening; ND, not determined; y, years
aWe identified the same genotype of Pt 4 in an abortion specimen of this family. Such foetus was biochemically affected
bMethylation analysis of this patient has been previously reported by Gueant et al. [6]
Fig. 1Molecular results of the homozygous PRDX1 patient (Pt 11). a PRDX1 Sanger sequencing showing the c.515-1G > T pathogenic variant in DNA samples of Pt 11 (at a homozygous level) and his parents (at a heterozygous level). Vertical arrows indicate the position of the mutated nucleotide in the patient and the corresponding nucleotide in his parents. b Pedigree of the family. c Multiplex RT-PCR showing amplification of MMACHC and ACTB cDNAs (fragments: 512 bp and 174 bp, respectively). Lane1: molecular marker, lane 2: Pt 11, lane 3, 4: normal controls, and lane 5: no cDNA template
Fig. 2Analyses of DNA methylation in the 11 epi-cblC patients. a Epi-Manhattan plot reporting the epigenome-wide association study comparing the 11 epi-cblC subjects with controls. The −log10 P-value reports on the t-test comparing the β values of epi-cblC subjects and controls. The horizontal line indicates a P-value threshold of 1 × 10–90. The top significant locus corresponds to the CpG island (CpG:33) on the CCDC163/MMACHC bidirectional promoter in chromosome 1. b Methylation levels of the CCDC163/MMACHC bidirectional promoter in the epi-cblC patients carrying the heterozygous PRDX1:c.515-1G > T variant and controls. The horizontal lines correspond to β value thresholds of 0.2, below which the CpG probe is considered to be fully unmethylated. Above 0.6 the CpG probe is considered as fully methylated. A β value between 0.2 and 0.6 indicates a hemimethylated CpG probe. c Methylation levels of the CCDC163/MMACHC bidirectional promoter in the homozygous epi-cblC patient (Pt 11) and his parents. All the reported CpG probes exhibit a hemimethylated profile in the parents and a full-methylated profile in the index case harbouring the PRDX1 splice variant (c.515-1G > T) at the homozygous state
Methylation profiles of the CCDC163/MMACHC locus in epi-cblC subjects harbouring the heterozygous PRDX1:c.515-1G > T variant and controls
| CpG probe | Chr | Positiona | CpG island CpG:33 | Mean | Mean | Smoothed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cg03123370 | 1 | 45965343 | 5' end of the CpG:33 | 0.51 | 0.11 | 1.43 × 10–133 | 6.46 × 10–128 | 1.69 × 10–130 | 1.66 × 10–100 |
| cg04700938 | 1 | 45965449 | 5' end of the CpG:33 | 0.44 | 0.06 | 4.98 × 10–130 | 2.25 × 10–124 | 5.16 × 10–127 | 6.92 × 10–109 |
| cg13848568 | 1 | 45965625 | Inside CpG:33 | 0.36 | 0.04 | 3.54 × 10–105 | 1.60 × 10–99 | 1.61 × 10–102 | 2.02 × 10–131 |
| cg00081251 | 1 | 45965679 | Inside CpG:33 | 0.51 | 0.07 | 5.99 × 10–148 | 2.71 × 10–142 | 1.09 × 10–144 | 1.12 × 10–149 |
| cg09323228 | 1 | 45965727 | Inside CpG:33 | 0.57 | 0.05 | 2.02 × 10–203 | 9.15 × 10–198 | 1.58 × 10–199 | 7.37 × 10–157 |
| cg27393325 | 1 | 45965846 | Inside CpG:33 | 0.56 | 0.02 | 7.18 × 10–194 | 3.25 × 10–188 | 4.57 × 10–190 | 2.53 × 10–169 |
| cg22536808 | 1 | 45965870 | Inside CpG:33 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.03 × 10–133 | 4.68 × 10–128 | 1.24 × 10–130 | 8.75 × 10–182 |
| cg14836864 | 1 | 45965990 | Inside CpG:33 | 0.49 | 0.03 | 7.49 × 10–184 | 3.39 × 10–178 | 3.49 × 10–180 | 8.89 × 10–161 |
| cg03108114 | 1 | 45966048 | Inside CpG:33 | 0.59 | 0.02 | 2.77 × 10–217 | 1.25 × 10–211 | 2.73 × 10–213 | 7.94 × 10–132 |
| cg15896098 | 1 | 45966115 | 3' end of the CpG:33 | 0.56 | 0.03 | 2.11 × 10–192 | 9.54 × 10–187 | 1.29 × 10–188 | 2.67 × 10–105 |
Chr, chromosome; Bonf, Bonferroni; FDR, false discovery rate
aPosition according to CRCh37
Comparison of signs and symptoms in epi-cblC and canonical-cblC patients
| 11 (this study) | 169 | |
| Small for gestational age | ++ [2 Pts] | + |
| Feeding difficulties, failure to thrive | ++++ [9 Pts] | +++ |
| Decreased consciousness and/or apnoea | ++++ [7 Pts] | ++ |
| Seizures | +++ [5 Pts] | +++ |
| Ataxia | − | + |
| Movement disorder and/or abnormal muscle tone | ++++ [9 Pts] | +++ |
| Peripheral neuropathy/subacute degeneration of spinal cord | (+) | ++ |
| Hydrocephalus | − | ++ |
| Visual impairment (retinopathy, optic atrophy) | ++++ [9 Pts] | +++ |
| Developmental disorder/cognitive impairment | ++++ [8 Pts] | +++ |
| Behavioural/mental disorders | ++ [2 Pts] | ++ |
| Microcephaly | (+) | ++ |
| Megaloblastic anaemia | +++ [5 Pts] | ++ |
| Pancytopenia/neutropenia | (+) | ++ |
| Recurrent severe infections | +++ [4 Pts] | (+) |
| Haemolytic uraemic syndrome | ++ [2 Pts] | ++ |
| Glomerulopathy | − | + |
| Tubulointerstitial nephropathy | − | + |
| Cardiac malformation | ++ [2 Pts] | + |
| Cardiomyopathy | (+) | ++ |
| Interstitial pneumonia | − | + |
| Pulmonary hypertension | − | + |
| Stroke | (+) | (+) |
| Venous thrombosis/embolism | (+) | + |
| Facial dysmorphism | ++ [2 Pts] | + |
| Skeletal deformity | +++ [3 Pts] | (+) |
| Cheilitis/gastritis | (+) | − |
| Liver steatosis | − | + |
| Dermatitis/rash/hyperpigmentation | − | + |
| Hydrops foetalis | − | + |
| Metabolic acidosis and/or hyperammonaemia | +++ [5 Pts] | + |
| Temperature instability/hypothermia | (+) | + |
++++, very frequently (> 50% of cases);+++, frequently (25–50% of cases);++, infrequently (10–25% of cases);+, occasionally seen (< 10% of cases); (+) single case reports, probably disease-related conditions; -, absent/not reported; Pts, patients. The number of our epi-cblC patients who exhibited that sign/symptom is indicated in square brackets
aClinical data for canonical-cblC patients (signs, symptoms and their frequencies) are derived from Huemer et al. [12]