| Literature DB >> 34215178 |
Xianwen Zhang1,2,3, Qiang He2, Wuhan Zhang2, Fu Shu2, Weiping Wang1,2, Zhizhou He3, Hairong Xiong4, Junhua Peng3, Huafeng Deng5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Harnessing heterosis is one of the major approaches to increase rice yield and has made a great contribution to food security. The identification and selection of outstanding parental genotypes especially among male sterile lines is a key step for exploiting heterosis. Two-line hybrid system is based on the discovery and application of photoperiod- and thermo-sensitive genic sensitive male sterile (PTGMS) materials. The development of wide-range of male sterile lines from a common gene pool leads to a narrower genetic diversity, which is vulnerable to biotic and abiotic stress. Hence, it is valuable to ascertain the genetic background of PTGMS lines and to understand their relationships in order to select and design a future breeding strategy.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic diversity; Male sterility; PTGMS; Two-line hybrid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34215178 PMCID: PMC8252326 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-021-03062-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1SNP markers density per Mb in the 12 chromosomes of rice genome genotyped by using 56 K SNP-Chip for 118 PTGMS lines and 13 conventional breeding lines
Fig. 2The trend and relationship among four populations for various genetic diversity parameters, including Number homozygous-1 alleles, Number of heterozygous alleles, Number homozygous-2 alleles, P-values for the Hardy Weinberg equilibrium, Genetic diversity parameter (π), and Shannon’s diversity index (I). The populations (P1-P4) were defined based on the presence of photosensitive male sterility (pms3) and temperature sensitive male sterility (tms5). P1 has pms3, P2 has tms5, P3 has both pms3 and tms5, and P4 is the conventional breeding lines without male sterility genes
Fig. 3The genetic differentiation evaluated by FST values and the ratio of π-values among P4 versus others male sterile populations (P1, P2, P3). The red boxes in Chromosomes (Chr) 2, 4, and 6 indicate the top selective sweeps
The Fst values for pairwise comparison among populations
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P123 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | – | 0.085 | 0.149 | 0.223 | – |
| P2 | 0.108 | – | 0.022 | 0.078 | – |
| P3 | 0.178 | 0.045 | – | 0.085 | – |
| P4 | 0.252 | 0.099 | 0.108 | – | 0.059 |
| P123 | – | – | – | 0.078 | – |
Note: Above diagonal are mean Fst values, while below diagonal are weighted Fst values. The populations (P1-P4) were defined based on the presence of photosensitive male sterility (pms3) and temperature sensitive male sterility (tms5). P1 has pms3, P2 has tms5, P3 has both pms3 and tms5, P4 is the conventional breeding lines without male sterility genes, and P123 represents the whole population of genotypes with male sterility genes
Fig. 4Neighbor joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree of 131 selected genotypes indicating the genetic distances based on SNP markers. The different clusters were indicated in different branch colors. The cluster with green and blue branch color belongs to P1 indicating the root of tree, the cluster with red branch color possessed the conventional breeding lines. The clusters with black and pink branch colors belong to P2 and P3, respectively
Fig. 5Principal component analysis of 131 rice genotypes, with PC1 and PC2 classifying the whole germplasm into clusters
Fig. 6Population admixture analysis of 131 genotypes up to K = 4, indicating the genetically stable and mixed genotypes
Fig. 7The candidate genes function analysis revealed by (A) KEGG and (b) (GO databases