Literature DB >> 34214936

Re-induction ipilimumab following acquired resistance to combination ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 therapy.

Adriana Hepner1, Victoria G Atkinson2, James Larkin3, Rebecca A Burrell3, Matteo S Carlino4, Douglas B Johnson5, Lisa Zimmer6, Katy K Tsai7, Oliver Klein8, Serigne N Lo9, Andrew Haydon10, Prachi Bhave11, Megan Lyle12, Lalit Pallan9, Ines Pires da Silva9, Camille Gerard13, Olivier Michielin13, Georgina V Long14, Alexander M Menzies15.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab has a high initial response rate in advanced melanoma; however, up to 55% of patients later progress. The efficacy and safety of ipilimumab re-induction in the setting of acquired resistance (AR) to combination immunotherapy is unknown.
METHODS: Patients with advanced melanoma who initially achieved a complete response, partial response or sustained stable disease to induction combination immunotherapy then progressed and were reinduced with ipilimumab (alone or in combination with anti-PD-1) and were analysed retrospectively. Demographics, disease characteristics, efficacy and toxicity were examined.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were identified from 12 centres. The response rate to reinduction therapy was 12/47 (26%), and disease control rate was 21/47 (45%). Responses appeared more frequent in patients who developed AR after ceasing induction immunotherapy (30% vs. 18%, P = 0.655). Time to AR was 11 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8-15 months). After a median follow-up of 16 months (95% CI, 10-25 months), responders to reinduction had a median progression-free survival of 14 months (95% CI, 13, NR months), and in the whole cohort, the median overall survival from reinduction was 17 months (95% CI, 12-NR months). Twenty-seven (58%) immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were reported; 18 (38%) were grade 3/4, and in 11 of 27 (40%), the same irAE observed during induction therapy recurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Reinduction with ipilimumab ± anti-PD-1 has modest clinical activity. Clinicians should be attentive to the risk of irAEs, including recurrence of irAEs that occurred during induction therapy. Future studies are necessary to determine best management after resistance to combination immunotherapy.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunotherapy; Ipilimumab; Melanoma; Programmed death-1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34214936     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  3 in total

Review 1.  Factors Determining Long-Term Antitumor Responses to Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy in Melanoma.

Authors:  Kimberly Loo; James W Smithy; Michael A Postow; Allison Betof Warner
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 2.  Risks and benefits of reinduction ipilimumab/nivolumab in melanoma patients previously treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab.

Authors:  Paul B Chapman; Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam; Katherine S Panageas; Margaret Callahan; Michael A Postow; Alexander N Shoushtari; Jedd D Wolchok; Allison Betof Warner
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 13.751

3.  Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Re-Induction following Resistance or Toxicity.

Authors:  Elias A T Koch; Anne Petzold; Anja Wessely; Edgar Dippel; Anja Gesierich; Ralf Gutzmer; Jessica C Hassel; Sebastian Haferkamp; Katharina C Kähler; Harald Knorr; Nicole Kreuzberg; Ulrike Leiter; Carmen Loquai; Friedegund Meier; Markus Meissner; Peter Mohr; Claudia Pföhler; Farnaz Rahimi; Dirk Schadendorf; Beatrice Schell; Max Schlaak; Patrick Terheyden; Kai-Martin Thoms; Beatrice Schuler-Thurner; Selma Ugurel; Jens Ulrich; Jochen Utikal; Michael Weichenthal; Fabian Ziller; Carola Berking; Markus V Heppt
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.