Hilary L Surratt1, Janet K Otachi2, Christopher J McLouth3, Nikita Vundi4. 1. University of Kentucky, Department of Behavioral Science, United States. Electronic address: hilary.surratt@uky.edu. 2. University of Kentucky, College of Social Work, United States. 3. University of Kentucky, Department of Behavioral Science, United States. 4. University of Kentucky, Center for Health Services Research, United States.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The HIV epidemic is increasingly penetrating rural areas of the U.S. due to evolving epidemics of injection drug use. Many rural areas experience deficits in availability of HIV prevention, testing and harm reduction services, and confront significant stigma that inhibits care seeking. This paper examines enacted stigma in healthcare settings among rural people who inject drugs (PWID) and explores associations of stigma with continuing high-risk behaviors for HIV. METHODS: PWID participants (n = 324) were recruited into the study in three county health department syringe service programs (SSPs), as well as in local community-based organizations. Trained interviewers completed a standardized baseline interview lasting approximately 40 min. Bivariate logistic regression models examined the associations between enacted healthcare stigma, health conditions, and injection risk behaviors, and a mediation analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Stigmatizing health conditions were common in this sample of PWID, and 201 (62.0 %) reported experiencing stigma from healthcare providers. Injection risk behaviors were uniformly associated with higher odds of enacted healthcare stigma, including sharing injection equipment at most recent injection (OR = 2.76; CI 1.55, 4.91), and lifetime receptive needle sharing (OR = 2.27; CI 1.42, 3.63). Enacted healthcare stigma partially mediated the relationship between having a stigmatizing health condition and engagement in high-risk injection behaviors. DISCUSSION: Rural PWID are vulnerable to stigma in healthcare settings, which contributes to high-risk injection behaviors for HIV. These findings have critical public health implications, including the importance of tailored interventions to decrease enacted stigma in care settings, and structural changes to expand the provision of healthcare services within SSP settings.
INTRODUCTION: The HIV epidemic is increasingly penetrating rural areas of the U.S. due to evolving epidemics of injection drug use. Many rural areas experience deficits in availability of HIV prevention, testing and harm reduction services, and confront significant stigma that inhibits care seeking. This paper examines enacted stigma in healthcare settings among rural people who inject drugs (PWID) and explores associations of stigma with continuing high-risk behaviors for HIV. METHODS: PWID participants (n = 324) were recruited into the study in three county health department syringe service programs (SSPs), as well as in local community-based organizations. Trained interviewers completed a standardized baseline interview lasting approximately 40 min. Bivariate logistic regression models examined the associations between enacted healthcare stigma, health conditions, and injection risk behaviors, and a mediation analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Stigmatizing health conditions were common in this sample of PWID, and 201 (62.0 %) reported experiencing stigma from healthcare providers. Injection risk behaviors were uniformly associated with higher odds of enacted healthcare stigma, including sharing injection equipment at most recent injection (OR = 2.76; CI 1.55, 4.91), and lifetime receptive needle sharing (OR = 2.27; CI 1.42, 3.63). Enacted healthcare stigma partially mediated the relationship between having a stigmatizing health condition and engagement in high-risk injection behaviors. DISCUSSION: Rural PWID are vulnerable to stigma in healthcare settings, which contributes to high-risk injection behaviors for HIV. These findings have critical public health implications, including the importance of tailored interventions to decrease enacted stigma in care settings, and structural changes to expand the provision of healthcare services within SSP settings.
Authors: Don C Des Jarlais; Ann Nugent; Alisa Solberg; Jonathan Feelemyer; Jonathan Mermin; Deborah Holtzman Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Kristi L Stringer; Bulent Turan; Lisa McCormick; Modupeoluwa Durojaiye; Laura Nyblade; Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Bronwen Lichtenstein; Janet M Turan Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2016-01
Authors: Jennifer R Havens; Carrie B Oser; Hannah K Knudsen; Michelle Lofwall; William W Stoops; Sharon L Walsh; Carl G Leukefeld; Alex H Kral Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Judith A Hahn; Kimberly Page-Shafer; Paula J Lum; Philippe Bourgois; Ellen Stein; Jennifer L Evans; Michael P Busch; Leslie H Tobler; Bruce Phelps; Andrew R Moss Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2002-11-04 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Hansel Tookes; Jessica Ucha; Allan E Rodriguez; Edward Suarez; Elizabeth Alonso; Lisa R Metsch; Daniel J Feaster; Tyler S Bartholomew; Kim A Hoffman; P Todd Korthuis Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Jennifer L Glick; Suzanne M Grieb; Samantha J Harris; Brian W Weir; Katherine C Smith; Tyler Puryear; Rebecca Hamilton White; Sean T Allen Journal: Harm Reduct J Date: 2022-05-19
Authors: Hilary L Surratt; Hannah J Yeager; Akosua Adu; Evelyn A González; Elizabeth O Nelson; Tamara Walker Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-05-30 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Suzan M Walters; David Frank; Brent Van Ham; Jessica Jaiswal; Brandon Muncan; Valerie Earnshaw; John Schneider; Samuel R Friedman; Danielle C Ompad Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-10-09