Literature DB >> 34213592

The impact of hepatic and renal function on panitumumab exposures in patients with metastatic RAS wild-type colorectal cancer.

Michael Z Liao1, Hans Prenen2, Sandeep Dutta3, Vijay V Upreti4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Panitumumab is a human monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor for the treatment of wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Currently, no dedicated clinical studies have evaluated the effect of organ impairment on the pharmacokinetics of panitumumab. Here, we present data from late phase studies of panitumumab in patients with mCRC and analyses of the effect of hepatic or renal impairment on the exposure of panitumumab.
METHODS: From three multicenter, open-label, phase 2 and phase 3 studies, 349 and 351 patients were included in hepatic and renal function subgroup analyses, respectively. Patients who received IV panitumumab and serum exposures were compared to patients with varying degrees of hepatic and renal organ dysfunction.
RESULTS: The Cmax and Ctrough values for patients with mild (n = 119) and moderate (n = 4) hepatic impairment were within the range of serum concentrations of panitumumab for the normal hepatic function subgroup. The distributions of serum concentration of panitumumab in patients with mild (n = 85) or moderate (n = 19) renal impairment were similar to the serum concentrations of panitumumab in the normal renal function subgroup. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and covariate analysis results were also consistent with lack of any significant effect of renal or hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of panitumumab. Additionally, real-world evidence from case studies of patients with mCRC and severe hepatic or renal impairment, which is a rare patient population to study, indicated lack of clinically relevant differences in exposure of panitumumab compared with patients with mCRC and normal hepatic or renal function.
CONCLUSIONS: Mild-to-moderate hepatic or renal dysfunction had no clinically meaningful impact on the pharmacokinetics of panitumumab in patients with mCRC. No dose adjustments for panitumumab are warranted in patients with mCRC with mild-to-moderate hepatic or renal dysfunction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00083616, NCT00089635, NCT00113763.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose adjustment; Hepatic impairment; Panitumumab; Pharmacokinetics; RAS wild-type; Renal impairment

Year:  2021        PMID: 34213592     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-021-04319-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  18 in total

1.  Panitumumab, a monoclonal anti epidermal growth factor receptor antibody in colorectal cancer: another one or the one?

Authors:  Wells A Messersmith; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Prevalence of aberrant expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human cancers.

Authors:  W J Gullick
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ann Goding Sauer; Stacey A Fedewa; Lynn F Butterly; Joseph C Anderson; Andrea Cercek; Robert A Smith; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacology considerations in biologics development.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Tian-hua Ren; Diane D Wang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Pharmacokinetic predictions for patients with renal impairment: focus on peptides and protein drugs.

Authors:  David Czock; Frieder Keller; Hanna M Seidling
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  The EGF receptor - an essential regulator of multiple epidermal functions.

Authors:  M Jost; C Kari; U Rodeck
Journal:  Eur J Dermatol       Date:  2000 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 3.328

7.  ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; A Cervantes; R Adam; A Sobrero; J H Van Krieken; D Aderka; E Aranda Aguilar; A Bardelli; A Benson; G Bodoky; F Ciardiello; A D'Hoore; E Diaz-Rubio; J-Y Douillard; M Ducreux; A Falcone; A Grothey; T Gruenberger; K Haustermans; V Heinemann; P Hoff; C-H Köhne; R Labianca; P Laurent-Puig; B Ma; T Maughan; K Muro; N Normanno; P Österlund; W J G Oyen; D Papamichael; G Pentheroudakis; P Pfeiffer; T J Price; C Punt; J Ricke; A Roth; R Salazar; W Scheithauer; H J Schmoll; J Tabernero; J Taïeb; S Tejpar; H Wasan; T Yoshino; A Zaanan; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Does Hepatic Impairment Affect the Exposure of Monoclonal Antibodies?

Authors:  Qin Sun; Shirley Seo; Simbarashe Zvada; Chao Liu; Kellie Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  A phase 3 trial evaluating panitumumab plus best supportive care vs best supportive care in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS or RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tae Won Kim; Anneli Elme; Zvonko Kusic; Joon Oh Park; Anghel Adrian Udrea; Sun Young Kim; Joong Bae Ahn; Ricardo Villalobos Valencia; Srinivasan Krishnan; Ante Bilic; Nebojsa Manojlovic; Jun Dong; Xuesong Guan; Catherine Lofton-Day; A Scott Jung; Eduard Vrdoljak
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of panitumumab in a patient with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  L L Krens; J M Baas; H J Guchelaar; H Gelderblom
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.