| Literature DB >> 34212042 |
Arezoo Mirzaei1, Bahram Nasr Esfahani1, Abbasali Raz2, Mustafa Ghanadian3, Sharareh Moghim1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Proteus mirabilis is a biofilm-forming agent that quickly settles on the urinary catheters and causing catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Thus, the spread of multidrug-resistant P. mirabilis isolates, with the ability to form a biofilm that carries integron, extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), and plasmid-mediated colistin resistance genes (mcr), represents a severe threat to managing nosocomial infectious diseases. This study is aimed at surveying the prevalence of ESBL, integrase, and mcr genes of P. mirabilis, isolated from the catheter, to assess the differences in their antimicrobial susceptibility and clonal dissemination.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34212042 PMCID: PMC8211507 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9952769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Sequences of primers used in this study.
| Gene | Primer sequence (5′-3′) | Product (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| F: GGT CAA GGA TCT GGA TTT CG | 483 | [ |
| R: ACA TGC GTG TAA ATC ATC GTC | |||
|
| F: CAC GGA TAT GCG ACA AAA AGG T | 789 | [ |
| R: GTA GCA AAC GAG TGA CGA AAT G | |||
|
| F: AGT GGG TGG CGA ATG AG | 600 | [ |
| R: TGT TCT TGT ATC GCC AGG TG | |||
|
| F: TTT GCG ATG TGC AGT ACC AGT AA | 544 | [ |
| R: CGA TAT CGT TGG TGG TGC CAT A | |||
|
| F: AGT ATT CAA CAT TTC CGT GTC | 850 | [ |
|
| F: ATG CGT TAT ATT CGC CTG TG | 862 | [ |
| R: GTT AGC GTT GCC AGT GCT CG | |||
|
| F: CGG TCA GTC CGT TTG TTC | 309 | [ |
| R: CTT GGT CGG TCT GTA GGG | |||
|
| F: TGT TGC TTG TGC CGA TTG GA | 567 | [ |
| R: AGA TGG TAT TGT TGG TTG CTG | |||
|
| F: AGA ATA TAA TCA ACC ACT GCG TA | 514 | [ |
| R: CAT TTT GGC TGT ATC CGC TTC | |||
| Rep-typing | GTG GTG GTG GTG GTG | Variable | [ |
Figure 1Graphical abstract of methodology.
The relationship between the duration of catheterization and the strength of biofilm formation.
| Duration of catheterization | Number of isolation (%) | Strong biofilm (%) | Moderate biofilm (%) | Weak biofilm (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 days | 4 (10) | 3 (75) | 1 (25) | 0 (0) |
| 10 days | 20 (50) | 7 (35) | 13 (65) | 0 (0) |
| 7 days | 16 (40) | 2 (12.5) | 6 (37.5) | 8 (50) |
Figure 2Frequency of antimicrobial resistance of Proteus mirabilis strains. Abbreviations: AMC: amoxicillin-clavulanate; SAM: ampicillin-sulbactam; AP: ampicillin; CAZ: ceftazidime; CTX: cefotaxime: CFM: cefixime; ATM: aztreonam; MER: meropenem; AMK: amikacin; Oflx: ofloxacin; NORfx: norfloxacin; CIP: ciprofloxacin; SXT: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; TET: tetracycline; NIT: nitrofurantoin.
The severity of biofilm and integrase prevalence.
| Biofilm | Integrase-1 positive | Integrase-2 positive | Total no | MDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong | 8 (66.6) | 3 (25) | 12 (30) | 11 (91.6) |
| Moderate | 13 (65) | 4 (20) | 20 (50) | 15 (75) |
| Weak | 4 (50) | 3 (37.5) | 8 (20) | 7 (87.5) |
| MDR | 22 (66.6) | 10 (30) | 33 (82.5) | — |
Antibiotic resistance pattern of P. mirabilis isolates according to integrase 1, 2 positivity.
| Antibiotic | No. resistant integrase 1 positive | No. resistant integrase 1 negative | No. resistant integrase 2 positive | No. resistant integrase 2 negative |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMC | 5 (20.8) | 4 (25) | 3 (30) | 7 (23.33) | NS |
| SAM | 0 (0) | 2 (12.5) | 1 (10) | 1 (3) | NS |
| ATM | 8 (25) | 3 (18.75) | 4 (40) | 7 (23.33) | NS |
| TET | 23 (95.8) | 15 (93.75) | 10 (100) | 28 (93.33) | NS |
| MEM | 8 (33.3) | 4 (25) | 4 (40) | 8 (26.66) | NS |
| NOR | 7 (29.1) | 5 (31.25) | 6 (60) | 6 (20) | <0.05 |
| CAZ | 9 (12.5) | 3 (18.75) | 2 (20) | 10 (33.33) | NS |
| Amp | 16 (62.5) | 6 (37.5) | 5 (50) | 10 (33.33) | NS |
| OFX | 10 (81) | 7 (43.75) | 8 (80) | 9 (30) | <0.05 |
| CFM | 7 (29.1) | 2 (12.5) | 2 (20) | 7 (23.33) | NS |
| SXT | 19 (79.1) | 11 (68.75) | 10 (100) | 20 (66.66) | <0.05 |
| CIP | 16 (50) | 9 (56.25) | 9 (90) | 16 (53.33) | NS |
| NIT | 24 (95.8) | 15 (93.75) | 10 (100) | 29 (96.66) | NS |
| AMK | 6 (83) | 2 (12.5) | 2 (20) | 6 (20) | NS |
| CTX | 14 (76) | 6 (37.5) | 4 (40) | 16 (53.33) | NS |
NS: not significant.
Figure 3Dendrogram showing genetic relatedness of 40 strains of Proteus mirabilis determined by Rep-PCR analysis with Dice similarity coefficient and unweighted pair-group method with average linkages clustering method. Cut-off value: 100%.