| Literature DB >> 34211145 |
Joshua S Bloom1,2,3, Laila Sathe4, Chetan Munugala5,6, Eric M Jones7, Molly Gasperini7, Nathan B Lubock7, Fauna Yarza7, Erin M Thompson7, Kyle M Kovary7, Jimin Park7, Dawn Marquette8, Stephania Kay8, Mark Lucas8, TreQuan Love8, A Sina Booeshaghi9, Oliver F Brandenberg5,6,10, Longhua Guo5,6,10, James Boocock5,6,10, Myles Hochman7, Scott W Simpkins7, Isabella Lin5,4, Nathan LaPierre11, Duke Hong8, Yi Zhang5, Gabriel Oland12, Bianca Judy Choe13, Sukantha Chandrasekaran4, Evann E Hilt4, Manish J Butte14,15, Robert Damoiseaux16,17,18, Clifford Kravit19, Aaron R Cooper7, Yi Yin5, Lior Pachter20, Omai B Garner4, Jonathan Flint5,21, Eleazar Eskin5,8,11, Chongyuan Luo5, Sriram Kosuri22,23, Leonid Kruglyak24,25,26, Valerie A Arboleda27,28.
Abstract
Frequent and widespread testing of members of the population who are asymptomatic for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is essential for the mitigation of the transmission of the virus. Despite the recent increases in testing capacity, tests based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays cannot be easily deployed at the scale required for population-wide screening. Here, we show that next-generation sequencing of pooled samples tagged with sample-specific molecular barcodes enables the testing of thousands of nasal or saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a single run without the need for RNA extraction. The assay, which we named SwabSeq, incorporates a synthetic RNA standard that facilitates end-point quantification and the calling of true negatives, and that reduces the requirements for automation, purification and sample-to-sample normalization. We used SwabSeq to perform 80,000 tests, with an analytical sensitivity and specificity comparable to or better than traditional qPCR tests, in less than two months with turnaround times of less than 24 h. SwabSeq could be rapidly adapted for the detection of other pathogens.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34211145 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00754-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Biomed Eng ISSN: 2157-846X Impact factor: 25.671