Literature DB >> 34211058

Bayesian ridge regression shows the best fit for SSR markers in Psidium guajava among Bayesian models.

Flavia Alves da Silva1, Alexandre Pio Viana2, Caio Cezar Guedes Correa2, Eileen Azevedo Santos2, Julie Anne Vieira Salgado de Oliveira2, José Daniel Gomes Andrade2, Rodrigo Moreira Ribeiro2, Leonardo Siqueira Glória3.   

Abstract

Markers are an important tool in plant breeding, which can improve conventional phenotypic breeding, generating more accurate information outcoming better decision making. This study aimed to apply and compare the fit of different Bayesian models BRR, BayesA, BayesB, BayesB (setting the value from very low to [Formula: see text] = [Formula: see text]), BayesC and Bayesian Lasso (LASSO) for predictions of the genomic genetic values of productivity and quality traits of a guava population. The models were fitted for traits fruit mass, pulp mass, soluble solids content, fruit number, and production per plant in the genomic prediction with SSR markers, obtained through the CTAB extraction method with 200 primers. The Bayesian ridge regression model showed the best results for all traits and was chosen to predict the individual's genomic values according to the cross-validation data. A good stabilization of the Markov and Monte Carlo chains was observed with the mean values close to the observed phenotypic means. Heritabilities showed good predictive accuracy. The model showed strong correlations between some traits, allowing indirect selection.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34211058     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93120-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  8 in total

Review 1.  Overview of LASSO-related penalized regression methods for quantitative trait mapping and genomic selection.

Authors:  Zitong Li; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Extended Bayesian LASSO for multiple quantitative trait loci mapping and unobserved phenotype prediction.

Authors:  Crispin M Mutshinda; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Priors in whole-genome regression: the bayesian alphabet returns.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement.

Authors:  Zeratsion Abera Desta; Rodomiro Ortiz
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  Performance of genomic selection in mice.

Authors:  Andrés Legarra; Christèle Robert-Granié; Eduardo Manfredi; Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Significance test and genome selection in bayesian shrinkage analysis.

Authors:  Xiaohong Che; Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Int J Plant Genomics       Date:  2010-06-10

7.  Prediction of complex human traits using the genomic best linear unbiased predictor.

Authors:  Gustavo de Los Campos; Ana I Vazquez; Rohan Fernando; Yann C Klimentidis; Daniel Sorensen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Genome-wide regression and prediction with the BGLR statistical package.

Authors:  Paulino Pérez; Gustavo de los Campos
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 4.562

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.