| Literature DB >> 34210090 |
Ozren Gamulin1,2, Marko Škrabić1,2, Kristina Serec1,3, Matej Par4, Marija Baković5, Maria Krajačić1, Sanja Dolanski Babić1,3, Nikola Šegedin1,3, Aziz Osmani6, Marin Vodanović7.
Abstract
Gender determination of the human remains can be very challenging, especially in the case of incomplete ones. Herein, we report a proof-of-concept experiment where the possibility of gender recognition using Raman spectroscopy of teeth is investigated. Raman spectra were recorded from male and female molars and premolars on two distinct sites, tooth apex and anatomical neck. Recorded spectra were sorted into suitable datasets and initially analyzed with principal component analysis, which showed a distinction between spectra of male and female teeth. Then, reduced datasets with scores of the first 20 principal components were formed and two classification algorithms, support vector machine and artificial neural networks, were applied to form classification models for gender recognition. The obtained results showed that gender recognition with Raman spectra of teeth is possible but strongly depends both on the tooth type and spectrum recording site. The difference in classification accuracy between different tooth types and recording sites are discussed in terms of the molecular structure difference caused by the influence of masticatory loading or gender-dependent life events.Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; artificial neural network; forensic dentistry; gender determination; multivariate statistical methods; principal component analysis; support vector machine
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34210090 PMCID: PMC8271900 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26133983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Characteristics of teeth used in this study.
| Specimen No. | Gender | Tooth Type According to ISO 3950 Notation | Donor Age (Years) | Time between Extraction and Spectra Collection (Years) | Reason for Extraction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 14 | 15 | 0.2 | ortho |
| 2 | M | 14 | 16 | 3.5 | ortho |
| 3 | M | 35 | 16 | 3.5 | endo |
| 4 | M | 47 | 22 | 0.2 | endo |
| 5 | M | 18 | 23 | 0.1 | imp/ret |
| 6 | M | 37 | 31 | 0.1 | endo |
| 7 | M | 37 | 32 | 0.2 | endo |
| 8 | M | 47 | 35 | 0.3 | endo |
| 9 | M | 27 | 44 | 0.1 | endo |
| 10 | M | 45 | 45 | 2.9 | endo |
| 11 | M | 14 | 47 | 4.2 | endo |
| 12 | M | 48 | 49 | 0.3 | perio |
| 13 | M | 25 | 52 | 3.9 | perio |
| 14 | M | 46 | 52 | 0.2 | endo |
| 15 | M | 47 | 54 | 0.3 | perio |
| 16 | M | 15 | 55 | 3.7 | perio |
| 17 | M | 27 | 55 | 4 | perio |
| 18 | M | 37 | 58 | 4.2 | perio |
| 19 | M | 17 | 58 | 4.2 | endo |
| 20 | M | 17 | 64 | 0.4 | perio |
| 21 | M | 44 | 64 | 0.1 | perio |
| 22 | M | 36 | 65 | 0.3 | endo |
| 23 | M | 17 | 67 | 0.2 | endo |
| 24 | M | 27 | 67 | 0.1 | perio |
| 25 | M | 45 | 68 | 4 | perio |
| 26 | M | 36 | 76 | 0.3 | endo |
| 27 | F | 24 | 11 | 4 | ortho |
| 28 | F | 36 | 17 | 0.5 | endo |
| 29 | F | 35 | 23 | 0.3 | ortho |
| 30 | F | 36 | 23 | 0.4 | endo |
| 31 | F | 47 | 23 | 0.5 | endo |
| 32 | F | 18 | 26 | 5.5 | endo |
| 33 | F | 28 | 29 | 0.4 | imp/ret |
| 34 | F | 28 | 31 | 0.3 | endo |
| 35 | F | 24 | 35 | 4.4 | endo |
| 36 | F | 28 | 35 | 0.4 | endo |
| 37 | F | 27 | 38 | 0.6 | perio |
| 38 | F | 18 | 39 | 0.6 | endo |
| 39 | F | 45 | 39 | 3.8 | perio |
| 40 | F | 48 | 39 | 0.3 | imp/ret |
| 41 | F | 37 | 46 | 0.6 | endo |
| 42 | F | 36 | 48 | 0.1 | endo |
| 43 | F | 35 | 49 | 3.4 | perio |
| 44 | F | 44 | 49 | 3.7 | perio |
| 45 | F | 27 | 51 | 0.5 | perio |
| 46 | F | 25 | 53 | 3.9 | perio |
| 47 | F | 37 | 55 | 0.5 | endo |
| 48 | F | 27 | 56 | 0.5 | perio |
| 49 | F | 34 | 58 | 0.2 | perio |
| 50 | F | 37 | 58 | 0.6 | perio |
| 51 | F | 45 | 62 | 4 | perio |
| 52 | F | 17 | 64 | 0.5 | endo |
| 53 | F | 45 | 65 | 4.1 | perio |
| 54 | F | 26 | 66 | 0.6 | perio |
| 55 | F | 37 | 73 | 0.6 | endo |
Reasons for extraction: Ortho = orthodontic extraction, endo = failed endodontic treatment or inability to perform endodontic treatment, perio = extraction due to advanced periodontitis, imp/ret = impacted or retained tooth.
Figure 1Representative Raman spectra of male and female molar teeth recorded from apex in the 3500–200 cm−1 range. The spectra are offset along the y-axis for clarity.
Assignment of major bands found in Raman spectra of teeth [27,30,31].
| Assignment | Wavenumber [cm−1] |
|---|---|
| ν(CH2) symmetric stretching | 2979 |
| ν(CH2) symmetric stretching | 2940 |
| ν(CH2) asymmetric stretching | 2883 |
| ν(C=O) Amide I | ~1665 |
| δ(CH2) bending mode | ~1450 |
| ~1242 | |
| ν1 (CO3 type B) symmetric stretching | 1069 |
| ν1 (PO4) symmetric stretching | 960 |
| ν(CC); ν2(CO3) hydroxyproline | 876 |
| δ (CCH) aromatic; ν2(CC) proline | ~853 |
| ν4 (PO4) asymmetric bending | 590 |
| ν2 (PO4) symmetric bending | ~431 |
Figure 2PC1 versus PC2 score plot resulting from the decomposition of Raman data obtained on tooth apex in the 3500–200 cm−1 range for: (a) premolars, (b) molars, (c) premolars and molars.
Figure 3PC1 versus PC2 score plot resulting from the decomposition of Raman data obtained on tooth anatomical neck in the 3500–200 cm−1 range for: (a) premolars, (b) molars, (c) premolars and molars.
Figure 4Cross-validation classification accuracy obtained by ANN and SVM in dependence on the number of used PCs for all calculated models: Molar apex and molar anatomical neck; premolar apex and premolar anatomical neck. Lines between symbols were added as a visual aid.
Cross-validation confusion matrices for models with highest obtained success rate (apex models). AUC values with their respective 95% confidence intervals and calculated DOR values are also presented.
| Molars | Premolars | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| 1 PC; Accuracy 94.77% | 8 PCs; Accuracy 95.12% | 20 PCs; Accuracy 80.89% | 20 PCs; Accuracy 67.52% | ||||||||
| AUC = 0.98 ± 0.02 | AUC = 0.99 ± 0.01 | AUC = 0.83 ± 0.07 | AUC = 0.80 ± 0.07 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| True | Male | Female | True | Male | Female | True | Male | Female | True | Male | Female |
| Male | 130 | 7 | Male | 133 | 9 | Male | 60 | 17 | Male | 51 | 29 |
| Female | 8 | 142 | Female | 5 | 140 | Female | 13 | 67 | Female | 22 | 55 |
Figure 5Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) in dependence on the number of used PCs for all calculated models. Lines between symbols were added as a visual aid.
Figure 6Classification accuracy obtained by ANN and SVM in dependence on the number of used PCs for all calculated models: Molar apex and molar anatomical neck; premolar apex and premolar anatomical neck. Lines between symbols were added as a visual aid.
Figure 7The average Raman spectra of molar apex male (grey line) and female (red line) teeth obtained in the spectral range between 3500–200 cm−1. The differential spectrum of average male and female spectra (male-female, black line) enhanced with student t-test result (red stars) and corresponding PC1 loadings (blue line).
Determination of the mineral-to-matrix ratio, as indicated by Raman intensity ratio of the corresponding bands, for spectra recorded on molar apex.
| PO4 (960 cm−1)/Amide I (1665 cm−1) | PO4 (960 cm−1)/CH2 (2940 cm−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female |
| 7.255 | 7.436 | 2.23 | 2.15 |