| Literature DB >> 34210088 |
Wieslaw Blach1, Miodrag Drapsin2, Nemanja Lakicevic3, Antonino Bianco3, Tamara Gavrilovic4, Roberto Roklicer5, Tatjana Trivic5, Ognjen Cvjeticanin5, Patrik Drid5, Maciej Kostrzewa6.
Abstract
Elite judo athletes undergo vigorous training to achieve outstanding results. In pursuit of achieving competitive success, the occurrence of injuries amongst judo athletes is not rare. The study aimed to perform a knee flexors and extensors isokinetic torque analysis in elite female judo athletes. Fifty-eight elite female judo athletes of the Serbian national team (21.02 ± 3.11 years; 62.36 ± 11.91 kg, 165.04 ± 10.24 cm, training experience 12.72 ± 2.98 years) volunteered to participate in this study. The range of motion (ROM) was set at 90°. Testing was performed in a concentric-concentric mode for the testing speed of 60 °/s. Five maximal voluntary contractions of knee extensors and knee flexors muscle groups were measured for both legs. The obtained data showed a statistically significant difference in absolute torque values among different categories as heavier athletes demonstrated higher values. Post hoc analysis showed a significant difference between weight categories, as heavier athletes demonstrated higher values, while no significant differences in normalized torque values for different weight categories were observed. The implementation of new elements and training modalities may improve performance and prevent lateral asymmetry, thus reducing the risk of injury.Entities:
Keywords: combat sports; hamstring; isokinetic strength; martial arts; quadriceps
Year: 2021 PMID: 34210088 PMCID: PMC8297175 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18136988
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Physical characteristics of the participants.
| Variable | −48 kg | −52 kg | −57 kg | −63 kg | −70 kg | −78 kg | +78 kg | Statistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height (cm) | 148.50 ± 1.61 | 160.00 ± 2.41 | 163.57 ± 4.87 a | 166.12 ± 4.54 a | 169.57 ± 11.22 a | 172.10 ± 8.77 a | 174.54 ± 6.56 a | F = 5.42, |
| Weight (kg) | 47.12 ± 1.80 | 52.00 ± 1.80 a | 56.62 ± 2.06 a, b | 60.55 ± 1.87 a, b, c | 67.25 ± 1.98 a, b, c, d | 74.16 ± 3.12 a, b, c, d, e | 82.11 ± 4.25 a, b, c, d, e, f | F = 204.75, |
| Age (y) | 20.62 ± 1.92 | 19.90 ± 3.24 | 21.25 ± 2.96 | 22.77 ± 4.99 | 19.75 ± 2.65 | 21.00 ± 2.45 | 21.01 ± 3.10 | F = 1.047, |
| Training experience (y) | 12.12 ± 2.53 | 12.10 ± 4.28 | 13.25 ± 1.38 | 14.88 ± 5.56 | 11.12 ± 1.12 | 12.16 ± 1.94 | 13.11 ± 1.36 | F = 1.470, |
Significantly different from: a –48 kg; b –52 kg; c –57 kg; d –63 kg; e –70 kg; f –78 kg.
Differences between weight categories of female judokas in peak muscle torques of the knee joint extensors and flexors.
| Variable | −48 kg | −52 kg | −57 kg | −63 kg | −70 kg | −78 kg | +78 kg | Statistics |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| KER (Nm) | 126.50 ± 18.36 | 132.00 ± 17.13 | 151.25 ± 24.92 | 157.33 ± 21.63 | 171.00 ± 32.08 a, b | 190.33 ± 12.78 a, b, c | 200.11 ± 22.03 a, b, c, d | F = 13.074, |
| KEL (Nm) | 129.37 ± 24.28 | 131.90 ± 22.98 | 157.12 ± 16.00 | 159.66 ± 26.19 | 167.62 ± 34.47 | 177.16 ± 29.06 a, b | 197.00 ± 22.94 a, b, c, d | F = 7.738, |
| KFR (Nm) | 65.12 ± 13.46 | 82.70 ± 11.48 | 79.87 ± 13.72 | 85.44 ± 17.57 | 97.12 ± 19.65 a | 95.83 ± 20.03 a | 102.88 ± 26.63 a | F = 4.088, |
| KFL (Nm) | 70.37 ± 13.93 | 81.20 ± 18.83 | 80.25 ± 14.42 | 84.00 ± 20.88 | 98.75 ± 13.76 | 101.33 ± 21.92 | 101.22 ± 28.30 a | F = 3.086, |
|
| ||||||||
| KER/kg (Nmkg−1) | 2.68 ± 0.35 | 2.53 ± 0.31 | 2.68 ± 0.49 | 2.60 ± 0.41 | 2.54 ± 0.49 | 2.57 ± 0.24 | 2.43 ± 0.22 | F = 0.458, |
| KEL/kg (Nmkg−1) | 2.74 ± 0.47 | 2.53 ± 0.42 | 2.78 ± 0.32 | 2.64 ± 0.50 | 2.49 ± 0.50 | 2.39 ± 0.43 | 2.39 ± 0.26 | F = 1.054, |
| KFR/kg (Nmkg−1) | 1.37 ± 0.26 | 1.59 ± 0.24 | 1.41 ± 0.23 | 1.41 ± 0.29 | 1.44 ± 0.31 | 1.29 ± 0.27 | 1.24 ± 0.27 | F = 1.535, |
| KFL/kg (Nmkg−1) | 1.49 ± 0.29 | 1.56 ± 0.38 | 1.41 ± 0.24 | 1.38 ± 0.32 | 1.47 ± 0.22 | 1.36 ± 0.27 | 1.22 ± 0.29 | F = 1.198, |
|
| ||||||||
| HQR (%) | 0.52 ± 0.14 | 063 ± 0.10 | 0.54 ± 0.17 | 0.55 ± 0.16 | 0.58 ± 0.13 | 0.50 ± 0.12 | 0.51 ± 0.11 | F = 0.876, |
| HQL (%) | 0.56 ± 0.15 | 0.62 ± 0.14 | 0.51 ± 0.13 | 0.54 ± 0.20 | 0.61 ± 0.16 | 0.58 ± 0.17 | 0.51 ± 0.14 | F = 0.611, |
KER—knee extension right; KEL—knee extension left; KFR—knee flexion right; KFL—knee flexion left; KER/kg—knee extension right related to weight; KEL/kg—knee extension left related to weight; KFR/kg—knee flexion right related to weight; KFL/kg—knee flexion left related to weight; HQR—hamstring to quadriceps ratio of the right leg, HQL—hamstring to quadriceps ratio of the left leg. Significantly different from: a –48 kg; b –52 kg; c –57 kg; d –63 kg.
Figure 1Mean torque and normalized torque values of extensors and flexors of the right knee.
Figure 2Mean torque and normalized torque values of extensors and flexors of the left knee.
Figure 3Correlation between normalized torque values of left and right leg flexors and training experience in years.
Figure 4Correlation between hamstring to quadriceps ratio and training experience in years.