| Literature DB >> 34209921 |
Ali Alhoshani1, Adam A A Sulaiman2, Homood M As Sobeai1, Wajhul Qamar1, Moureq Alotaibi1, Khalid Alhazzani1, Muhammad Monim-Ul-Mehboob3, Saeed Ahmad4, Anvarhusein A Isab2.
Abstract
Three novel gold(III) complexes (1-3) of general composition [Au(Entities:
Keywords: 2,2′-bipyridine-3,3′-dicarboxylic acid; anti-cancer activity; apoptosis; dithiocarbamates; gold(III)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34209921 PMCID: PMC8272064 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26133973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1The possible structures of gold(III) complexes along with resonance assignment. In all cases, counter ions are chloride.
IR frequencies (cm−1) of free ligands and their complexes.
| Ligand/Complex | ν (O-H) | ν (C-H) | ν (COO) | ν (N-CS) | ν (C = C) | ν (CSS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMDTC | - | - | - | 1488 | - | 926 |
| DEDTC | - | - | - | 1445 | - | 986 |
| DBDTC | - | 2923, 2854 | 1600 | 1467 | 1436 | 985 |
|
| 3451 | 2953, 2851 | 1645 | - | - | - |
|
| 3448 | - | 1652 | 1575 | 1399 | 1047, 967 |
|
| 3440 | 2975, 2853 | 1662 | 1550 | 1347 | 1065, 993 |
|
| 3439 | 2928, 2854 | 1716 | 1549 | 1435 | 1067, 904 |
1H-NMR chemical shifts for free ligands and their compounds in DMSO-d.
| Ligand/Complex | H-1 | H-2 | H-3 | H-6 | H-8 | H-9 | Aromatic-Hs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMDTC | - | - | - | - | 3.35 s | - | - |
| DEDTC | - | - | - | - | 3.93 q | 1.13 t | - |
| DBDTC | - | - | - | - | 5.31, 4.77 d | - | 7.24 m–7.39 m |
|
| 8.71d | 7.58 t | 8.31d | - | - | - | - |
|
| 8.67d | 7.52 t | 8.26 d | - | 3.36 s | - | - |
|
| 8.69d | 7.56 t | 8.29 d | - | 3.76 q | 1.28 t | - |
|
| 8.89d | 7.77 t | 8.78 d | 10.13 | 4.85, 4.76 d | - | 7.22 m–7.33 m |
s: Singlet; d: Doublet, t: Triplet; q: Quartet; m: Multiplet.
13C-NMR chemical shifts for free ligands and their complexes in DMSO-d.
| Ligand/Complex | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C = S | C8 | C9 | Aromatic Cs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMDTC | - | - | - | - | - | - | 208.3 | 45.7 | - | - |
| DEDTC | - | - | - | - | - | - | 206.4 | 49.5 | 12.1 | - |
| DBDTC | - | - | - | - | - | - | 213.1 | 56.9 | - | 127.7–137.2 |
|
| 157.9 | 126.8 | 138.4 | 123.3 | 150.3 | 166.7 | - | - | - | - |
|
| 158.8 | 126.6 | 137.8 | 122.8 | 150.6 | 167 | 193.9 | 40.3 | - | - |
|
| 158.2 | 126.6 | 138.1 | 123 | 150.3 | 166.7 | 193.8 | 46.5 | 12 | - |
|
| 155.9 | 119.4 | 142.8 | 122.8 | 151.2 | 193.4 | 52.1 | - |
IC50 values (μM) of cisplatin and gold(III) compounds (A, 1–3) against A549, HeLa, MDA-231, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines.
| IC50 in μM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A549 | HeLa | MDA-231 | MCF-7 | |
| Cisplatin | 9.61 (± 0.08) | 9.3 (± 0.2) | 7.8 (± 0.02) | 31.06 (± 0.1) |
|
| 7.4 (± 0.07) | 7.3 (± 0.03) | 5.5 (± 0.02) | 15.9 (± 0.021) |
|
| 3.02 (± 0.1) | 2.8 (± 0.05) | 3.3 (± 0.01) | 4.08 (± 0.019) |
|
| 3.08 (± 0.06) | 3.1 (± 0.1) | 3.3 (± 0.01) | 2.7 (± 0.1) |
|
| 3.1 (± 0.5) | 3.7 (± 0.07) | 4.1 (± 0.03) | 3.7 (± 0.019) |
Figure 1Effect of the concentration of complexes A, 1–3 and cisplatin on the viability of MCF-7 cells.
Figure 2Effect of the concentration of complexes A, 1–3 and cisplatin on the viability of A549 cells.
Figure 3Effect of the concentration of complexes A, 1–3 and cisplatin on the viability of HeLa cells.
Figure 4Effect of the concentration of complexes A, 1–3 and cisplatin on the viability of MDA cells.
Figure 5Apoptotic evaluation by Annexin V staining of MCF-7 cells treated with 2. The (****) is significant compare to control.
Figure 6DNA damage-inducing effect of complex 2. In (A–C), A1: percentage of ATM-activated cells, A2: percentage of DNA double-strand breaks (dual activation of both ATM and H2A.X), A3: percentage of negative cells (e.g., no DNA damage), (D) the total DNA damage (A1 + A2 + A4). A significant increase in DNA strand breaks was observed in complex 2 treated cells in a dose-dependent manner. The (**) and (****) is significant compare to control.
Figure 7UV–vis spectra of 1 ppm complexes 1 and 3 taken in acetonitrile with the presence of 0.5% v/v BPS (pH 7.0) at room temperature.
Figure 8The effect of complex 2 concentrations on ROS levels in MCF-7 cells. The shift of the peaks toward the right shows increasing ROS accumulation in treated cells. The (**) and (****) is significant compare to control.
Figure 9The effect of complex 2 concentrations on mitochondrial membrane potential in MCF-7 cells. The (****) is significant compare to control.