Literature DB >> 34209762

Improving the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores as a Biomarker for Alzheimer's Disease.

Dimitrios Vlachakis1,2,3, Eleni Papakonstantinou1, Ram Sagar4, Flora Bacopoulou2, Themis Exarchos5, Panos Kourouthanassis5, Vasileios Karyotis5, Panayiotis Vlamos5, Constantine Lyketsos6,7, Dimitrios Avramopoulos4,6,7, Vasiliki Mahairaki4,6.   

Abstract

The treatment of complex and multifactorial diseases constitutes a big challenge in day-to-day clinical practice. As many parameters influence clinical phenotypes, accurate diagnosis and prompt therapeutic management is often difficult. Significant research and investment focuses on state-of-the-art genomic and metagenomic analyses in the burgeoning field of Precision (or Personalized) Medicine with genome-wide-association-studies (GWAS) helping in this direction by linking patient genotypes at specific polymorphic sites (single-nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) to the specific phenotype. The generation of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) is a relatively novel statistical method that associates the collective genotypes at many of a person's SNPs to a trait or disease. As GWAS sample sizes increase, PRSs may become a powerful tool for prevention, early diagnosis and treatment. However, the complexity and multidimensionality of genetic and environmental contributions to phenotypes continue to pose significant challenges for the clinical, broad-scale use of PRSs. To improve the value of PRS measures, we propose a novel pipeline which might better utilize GWAS results and improve the utility of PRS when applied to Alzheimer's Disease (AD), as a paradigm of multifactorial disease with existing large GWAS datasets that have not yet achieved significant clinical impact. We propose a refined approach for the construction of AD PRS improved by (1), taking into consideration the genetic loci where the SNPs are located, (2) evaluating the post-translational impact of SNPs on coding and non-coding regions by focusing on overlap with open chromatin data and SNPs that are expression quantitative trait loci (QTLs), and (3) scoring and annotating the severity of the associated clinical phenotype into the PRS. Open chromatin and eQTL data need to be carefully selected based on tissue/cell type of origin (e.g., brain, excitatory neurons). Applying such filters to traditional PRS on GWAS studies of complex diseases like AD, can produce a set of SNPs weighted according to our algorithm and a more useful PRS. Our proposed methodology may pave the way for new applications of genomic machine and deep learning pipelines to GWAS datasets in an effort to identify novel clinically useful genetic biomarkers for complex diseases like AD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; biomarkers; polygenic risk scores

Year:  2021        PMID: 34209762     DOI: 10.3390/cells10071627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cells        ISSN: 2073-4409            Impact factor:   6.600


  45 in total

1.  Impact of chromatin structure on sequence variability in the human genome.

Authors:  Michael Y Tolstorukov; Natalia Volfovsky; Robert M Stephens; Peter J Park
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 2.  Developing and evaluating polygenic risk prediction models for stratified disease prevention.

Authors:  Nilanjan Chatterjee; Jianxin Shi; Montserrat García-Closas
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Tutorial: a guide to performing polygenic risk score analyses.

Authors:  Shing Wan Choi; Timothy Shin-Heng Mak; Paul F O'Reilly
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Genes associated with Alzheimer's disease: an overview and current status.

Authors:  Mohan Giri; Man Zhang; Yang Lü
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  From Polygenic Scores to Precision Medicine in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Judith R Harrison; Sumit Mistry; Natalie Muskett; Valentina Escott-Price
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

6.  UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Polygenic Risk Score Contribution to Psychosis Prediction in a Target Population of Persons at Clinical High Risk.

Authors:  Diana O Perkins; Loes Olde Loohuis; Jenna Barbee; John Ford; Clark D Jeffries; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas H McGlashan; Larry J Seidman; Ming Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J C Lambert; C A Ibrahim-Verbaas; D Harold; A C Naj; R Sims; C Bellenguez; A L DeStafano; J C Bis; G W Beecham; B Grenier-Boley; G Russo; T A Thorton-Wells; N Jones; A V Smith; V Chouraki; C Thomas; M A Ikram; D Zelenika; B N Vardarajan; Y Kamatani; C F Lin; A Gerrish; H Schmidt; B Kunkle; M L Dunstan; A Ruiz; M T Bihoreau; S H Choi; C Reitz; F Pasquier; C Cruchaga; D Craig; N Amin; C Berr; O L Lopez; P L De Jager; V Deramecourt; J A Johnston; D Evans; S Lovestone; L Letenneur; F J Morón; D C Rubinsztein; G Eiriksdottir; K Sleegers; A M Goate; N Fiévet; M W Huentelman; M Gill; K Brown; M I Kamboh; L Keller; P Barberger-Gateau; B McGuiness; E B Larson; R Green; A J Myers; C Dufouil; S Todd; D Wallon; S Love; E Rogaeva; J Gallacher; P St George-Hyslop; J Clarimon; A Lleo; A Bayer; D W Tsuang; L Yu; M Tsolaki; P Bossù; G Spalletta; P Proitsi; J Collinge; S Sorbi; F Sanchez-Garcia; N C Fox; J Hardy; M C Deniz Naranjo; P Bosco; R Clarke; C Brayne; D Galimberti; M Mancuso; F Matthews; S Moebus; P Mecocci; M Del Zompo; W Maier; H Hampel; A Pilotto; M Bullido; F Panza; P Caffarra; B Nacmias; J R Gilbert; M Mayhaus; L Lannefelt; H Hakonarson; S Pichler; M M Carrasquillo; M Ingelsson; D Beekly; V Alvarez; F Zou; O Valladares; S G Younkin; E Coto; K L Hamilton-Nelson; W Gu; C Razquin; P Pastor; I Mateo; M J Owen; K M Faber; P V Jonsson; O Combarros; M C O'Donovan; L B Cantwell; H Soininen; D Blacker; S Mead; T H Mosley; D A Bennett; T B Harris; L Fratiglioni; C Holmes; R F de Bruijn; P Passmore; T J Montine; K Bettens; J I Rotter; A Brice; K Morgan; T M Foroud; W A Kukull; D Hannequin; J F Powell; M A Nalls; K Ritchie; K L Lunetta; J S Kauwe; E Boerwinkle; M Riemenschneider; M Boada; M Hiltuenen; E R Martin; R Schmidt; D Rujescu; L S Wang; J F Dartigues; R Mayeux; C Tzourio; A Hofman; M M Nöthen; C Graff; B M Psaty; L Jones; J L Haines; P A Holmans; M Lathrop; M A Pericak-Vance; L J Launer; L A Farrer; C M van Duijn; C Van Broeckhoven; V Moskvina; S Seshadri; J Williams; G D Schellenberg; P Amouyel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Integration and relative value of biomarkers for prediction of MCI to AD progression: spatial patterns of brain atrophy, cognitive scores, APOE genotype and CSF biomarkers.

Authors:  Xiao Da; Jon B Toledo; Jarcy Zee; David A Wolk; Sharon X Xie; Yangming Ou; Amanda Shacklett; Paraskevi Parmpi; Leslie Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Genomic Risk Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease in 480,000 Adults: Implications for Primary Prevention.

Authors:  Michael Inouye; Gad Abraham; Christopher P Nelson; Angela M Wood; Michael J Sweeting; Frank Dudbridge; Florence Y Lai; Stephen Kaptoge; Marta Brozynska; Tingting Wang; Shu Ye; Thomas R Webb; Martin K Rutter; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Riyaz S Patel; Ruth J F Loos; Bernard Keavney; Harry Hemingway; John Thompson; Hugh Watkins; Panos Deloukas; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Adam S Butterworth; John Danesh; Nilesh J Samani
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Epitranscriptomics of cardiovascular diseases (Review).

Authors:  Stefanos Leptidis; Eleni Papakonstantinou; Kalliopi Io Diakou; Katerina Pierouli; Thanasis Mitsis; Konstantina Dragoumani; Flora Bacopoulou; Despina Sanoudou; George P Chrousos; Dimitrios Vlachakis
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.101

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.