Literature DB >> 34209610

Training Load Measures and Biomarker Responses during a 7-Day Training Camp in Young Cyclists-A Pilot Study.

Yvonne Wahl1, Silvia Achtzehn2, Daniela Schäfer Olstad3, Joachim Mester2, Patrick Wahl4.   

Abstract

Background and
Objectives: During intense training periods, there is a high need to monitor the external and especially the internal training load in order to fine-tune the training process and to avoid overreaching or overtraining. However, data on stress reactions, especially of biomarkers, to high training loads in children and youth are rare. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the training load of youth athletes during a training camp using a multilevel approach. Materials and
Methods: Six trained youth male cyclists performed a 7-day preseason training camp. To investigate the internal training load, every morning, minimally invasive "point-of-care testing" (POCT) devices were used to analyze the following biomarkers: creatine kinase (CK), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), albumin (Alb), bilirubin (Bil), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and total protein (TP). Additionally, data of training load measures (HR: heart rate, RPE: rating of perceived exertion, sRPE: session-RPE, TRIMP: training impulse, intensity (RPE:HR), and load (sRPE:TRIMP) ratios), self-perception (person's perceived physical state, questionnaires on muscle soreness, and sleep quality), and measures of the autonomic nervous system (resting heart rate, heart rate variability) were collected. Two days before and after the training camp, subjects performed performance tests (Graded Exercise Test, Wingate Anaerobic Test, Counter Movement Jump).
Results: Primarily, the biomarkers CK, BUN, and Alb, as well as the self-perception showed moderate to large load-dependent reactions during the 7-day training camp. The biomarkers returned to baseline values two days after the last training session. Power output at lactate threshold showed a small increase, and no changes were found for other performance parameters. Conclusions: The study suggests that a multilevel approach is suitable to quantify the internal training load and that different parameters can be used to control the training process. The biomarkers CK, BUN, and Alb are suitable for objectively quantifying the internal training load. The self-perception provides additional subjective information about the internal training load.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; point-of-care testing; training load; young cyclists

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34209610     DOI: 10.3390/medicina57070673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)        ISSN: 1010-660X            Impact factor:   2.430


  34 in total

1.  A new approach to monitoring exercise training.

Authors:  C Foster; J A Florhaug; J Franklin; L Gottschall; L A Hrovatin; S Parker; P Doleshal; C Dodge
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Comparison of serum creatinine, uric acid, albumin and glucose in male professional endurance athletes compared with healthy controls.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Giorgio Brocco; Massimo Franchini; Federico Schena; Giancesare Guidi
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Contextualizing Parasympathetic Hyperactivity in Functionally Overreached Athletes With Perceptions of Training Tolerance.

Authors:  Clint R Bellenger; Laura Karavirta; Rebecca L Thomson; Eileen Y Robertson; Kade Davison; Jonathan D Buckley
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.010

4.  Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an "optimal" distribution?

Authors:  K Stephen Seiler; Glenn Øvrevik Kjerland
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  The biochemistry of runners in a 1600 km ultramarathon.

Authors:  K E Fallon; G Sivyer; K Sivyer; A Dare
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Plasma urea, creatinine, uric acid, albumin, and total protein concentrations before and after 15-, 25-, and 42-km contests.

Authors:  G M Janssen; C P Degenaar; P P Menheere; H M Habets; P Geurten
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.118

7.  Monitoring changes in performance, physiology, biochemistry, and psychology during overreaching and recovery in triathletes.

Authors:  A J Coutts; L K Wallace; K M Slattery
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 8.  Serum albumin: touchstone or totem?

Authors:  M P Margarson; N Soni
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Load management in elite German distance runners during 3-weeks of high-altitude training.

Authors:  Billy Sperlich; Silvia Achtzehn; Markus de Marées; Henning von Papen; Joachim Mester
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2016-06

10.  How much is too much? (Part 2) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of illness.

Authors:  Martin Schwellnus; Torbjørn Soligard; Juan-Manuel Alonso; Roald Bahr; Ben Clarsen; H Paul Dijkstra; Tim J Gabbett; Michael Gleeson; Martin Hägglund; Mark R Hutchinson; Christa Janse Van Rensburg; Romain Meeusen; John W Orchard; Babette M Pluim; Martin Raftery; Richard Budgett; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  1 in total

1.  Case Report: Training Monitoring and Performance Development of a Triathlete With Spinal Cord Injury and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia During a Paralympic Cycle.

Authors:  Oliver J Quittmann; Benjamin Lenatz; Patrick Bartsch; Frauke Lenatz; Tina Foitschik; Thomas Abel
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-06-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.