Francesco Natale1, Raffaele Capasso2, Alfonso Casalino3, Clotilde Crescenzi3, Paolo Sangiuolo3, Paolo Golino1,2, Francesco S Loffredo1,2,4, Giovanni Cimmino2,5. 1. Vanvitelli Cardiology and Intensive Care Unit, Monaldi Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy. 2. Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Cardiology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy. 3. Vascular Surgery Unit, Monaldi Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy. 4. Molecular Cardiology, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 34149 Trieste, Italy. 5. Cardiology Unit, Policlinico Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: It is well established that patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) as well abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have an increased cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Despite this higher risk, PAD and AAA patients are often suboptimality treated. This study assessed the CV profile of PAD and AAA patients, quantifying the survival benefits of target-based risk-factors modification even in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: PAD and AAA patients admitted for any reason to the Vascular Unit from January 2019 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical and CV profiles as well as ongoing medical therapies were recorded. Benefits of CV risk-factors control were estimated using the SMART-REACH model. A follow-up visit during the year 2020 was scheduled. Results: A total of 669 patients were included. Of these, 190 showed AAA and 479 PAD at any stage. Only 54% of PAD and 41% of AAA patients were on lipid-lowering drugs with non-optimal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels for most of them. A better control of all modifiable CV risk-factors based on the current guidelines would offer an absolute risk reduction of the mean 10-year CV risk by 9% in PAD and 14% in AAA. Unfortunately, the follow-up visit was lost because of COVID-19 limitations. Conclusions: Lipid profiles of PAD and AAA patients were far from guideline-based targets, and medical management was suboptimal. In our center, the COVID-19 pandemic impacted on the strict surveillance required in these very high-risk patients. The achievement of guideline-based therapeutic targets would definitively confer additional significant benefits in reducing the CV risk in these patients.
Background and Objectives: It is well established that patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) as well abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have an increased cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Despite this higher risk, PAD and AAApatients are often suboptimality treated. This study assessed the CV profile of PAD and AAApatients, quantifying the survival benefits of target-based risk-factors modification even in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: PAD and AAApatients admitted for any reason to the Vascular Unit from January 2019 to February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Biochemical and CV profiles as well as ongoing medical therapies were recorded. Benefits of CV risk-factors control were estimated using the SMART-REACH model. A follow-up visit during the year 2020 was scheduled. Results: A total of 669 patients were included. Of these, 190 showed AAA and 479 PAD at any stage. Only 54% of PAD and 41% of AAApatients were on lipid-lowering drugs with non-optimal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels for most of them. A better control of all modifiable CV risk-factors based on the current guidelines would offer an absolute risk reduction of the mean 10-year CV risk by 9% in PAD and 14% in AAA. Unfortunately, the follow-up visit was lost because of COVID-19 limitations. Conclusions: Lipid profiles of PAD and AAApatients were far from guideline-based targets, and medical management was suboptimal. In our center, the COVID-19 pandemic impacted on the strict surveillance required in these very high-risk patients. The achievement of guideline-based therapeutic targets would definitively confer additional significant benefits in reducing the CV risk in these patients.
Authors: Anupam B Jena; Daniel M Blumenthal; Warren Stevens; Jacquelyn W Chou; Thanh G N Ton; Dana P Goldman Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Marc P Bonaca; Patrice Nault; Robert P Giugliano; Anthony C Keech; Armando Lira Pineda; Estella Kanevsky; Julia Kuder; Sabina A Murphy; J Wouter Jukema; Basil S Lewis; Lale Tokgozoglu; Ransi Somaratne; Peter S Sever; Terje R Pedersen; Marc S Sabatine Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mary McGrae McDermott; Aimee Luna Mandapat; Amanda Moates; Monique Albay; Eric Chiou; Lillian Celic; Philip Greenland Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2003-10-13
Authors: Brendan R Jackson; Jeremy A W Gold; Pavithra Natarajan; John Rossow; Robyn Neblett Fanfair; Juliana da Silva; Karen K Wong; Sean D Browning; Sapna Bamrah Morris; Jessica Rogers-Brown; Alfonso C Hernandez-Romieu; Christine M Szablewski; Nadine Oosmanally; Melissa Tobin-D'Angelo; Cherie Drenzek; David J Murphy; Julie Hollberg; James M Blum; Robert Jansen; David W Wright; William M Sewell; Jack D Owens; Benjamin Lefkove; Frank W Brown; Deron C Burton; Timothy M Uyeki; Stephanie R Bialek; Priti R Patel; Beau B Bruce Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: José Aderval Aragão; Rosely Mota Santos; Osmar Max Gonçalves Neves; Iapunira Catarina Sant'Anna Aragão; Felipe Matheus Sant'Anna Aragão; Maria Izabel Aragão Mota; Rebeca de Souza Mariano Bastos; Francisco Prado Reis Journal: J Vasc Bras Date: 2018 Apr-Jun