Literature DB >> 34209405

A Machine Learning Model for the Prognosis of Pulseless Electrical Activity during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Jon Urteaga1, Elisabete Aramendi1,2, Andoni Elola3, Unai Irusta1,2, Ahamed Idris4.   

Abstract

Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is characterized by the disassociation of the mechanical and electrical activity of the heart and appears as the initial rhythm in 20-30% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases. Predicting whether a patient in PEA will convert to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is important because different therapeutic strategies are needed depending on the type of PEA. The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning model to differentiate PEA with unfavorable (unPEA) and favorable (faPEA) evolution to ROSC. An OHCA dataset of 1921 5s PEA signal segments from defibrillator files was used, 703 faPEA segments from 107 patients with ROSC and 1218 unPEA segments from 153 patients with no ROSC. The solution consisted of a signal-processing stage of the ECG and the thoracic impedance (TI) and the extraction of the TI circulation component (ICC), which is associated with ventricular wall movement. Then, a set of 17 features was obtained from the ECG and ICC signals, and a random forest classifier was used to differentiate faPEA from unPEA. All models were trained and tested using patientwise and stratified 10-fold cross-validation partitions. The best model showed a median (interquartile range) area under the curve (AUC) of 85.7(9.8)% and a balance accuracy of 78.8(9.8)%, improving the previously available solutions at more than four points in the AUC and three points in balanced accuracy. It was demonstrated that the evolution of PEA can be predicted using the ECG and TI signals, opening the possibility of targeted PEA treatment in OHCA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrocardiogram (ECG); out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA); pulseless electrical activity (PEA); return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC); thoracic impedance (TI)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34209405     DOI: 10.3390/e23070847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Entropy (Basel)        ISSN: 1099-4300            Impact factor:   2.524


  38 in total

Review 1.  Pulseless electrical activity in cardiac arrest: electrocardiographic presentations and management considerations based on the electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Chris Mehta; William Brady
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Reliable extraction of the circulation component in the thoracic impedance measured by defibrillation pads.

Authors:  J Ruiz; E Alonso; E Aramendi; J Kramer-Johansen; T Eftestøl; U Ayala; D González-Otero
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 3.  Pulseless electric activity: definition, causes, mechanisms, management, and research priorities for the next decade: report from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.

Authors:  Robert J Myerburg; Henry Halperin; Debra A Egan; Robin Boineau; Sumeet S Chugh; Anne M Gillis; Joshua I Goldhaber; David A Lathrop; Peter Liu; James T Niemann; Joseph P Ornato; George Sopko; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Gregory P Walcott; Myron L Weisfeldt; Jacqueline D Wright; Douglas P Zipes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  ECG changes during resuscitation of patients with initial pulseless electrical activity are associated with return of spontaneous circulation.

Authors:  Gunnar Waage Skjeflo; Trond Nordseth; Jan Pål Loennechen; Daniel Bergum; Eirik Skogvoll
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe - Results of the EuReCa TWO study.

Authors:  Jan-Thorsten Gräsner; Jan Wnent; Johan Herlitz; Gavin D Perkins; Rolf Lefering; Ingvild Tjelmeland; Rudolph W Koster; Siobhán Masterson; Fernando Rossell-Ortiz; Holger Maurer; Bernd W Böttiger; Maximilian Moertl; Pierre Mols; Hajriz Alihodžić; Irzal Hadžibegović; Marios Ioannides; Anatolij Truhlář; Mads Wissenberg; Ari Salo; Josephine Escutnaire; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Eniko Nagy; Bergthor Steinn Jonsson; Peter Wright; Federico Semeraro; Carlo Clarens; Steffie Beesems; Grzegorz Cebula; Vitor H Correia; Diana Cimpoesu; Violetta Raffay; Stefan Trenkler; Andrej Markota; Anneli Strömsöe; Roman Burkart; Scott Booth; Leo Bossaert
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 6.  Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe.

Authors:  Christie Atwood; Mickey S Eisenberg; Johan Herlitz; Thomas D Rea
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Rhythms and outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Peter A Meaney; Vinay M Nadkarni; Karl B Kern; Julia H Indik; Henry R Halperin; Robert A Berg
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  Capnography during cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Claudio Sandroni; Paolo De Santis; Sonia D'Arrigo
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 9.  Pseudo-pulseless electrical activity in the emergency department, an evidence based approach.

Authors:  J Rabjohns; T Quan; K Boniface; A Pourmand
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  Factors associated with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with pulseless electric activity: A population-based study.

Authors:  Dennis T Ko; Feng Qiu; Maria Koh; Paul Dorian; Sheldon Cheskes; Peter C Austin; Damon C Scales; Harindra C Wijeysundera; P Richard Verbeek; Ian Drennan; Tiffany Ng; Jack V Tu; Laurie J Morrison
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.