Literature DB >> 34209098

Review of the Health, Welfare and Care Workforce in Tasmania, Australia: 2011-2016.

Belinda Jessup1, Tony Barnett1, Kehinde Obamiro1, Merylin Cross1, Edwin Mseke1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On a per capita basis, rural communities are underserviced by health professionals when compared to metropolitan areas of Australia. However, most studies evaluating health workforce focus on discrete professional groups rather than the collective contribution of the range of health, care and welfare workers within communities. The objective of this study was therefore to illustrate a novel approach for evaluating the broader composition of the health, welfare and care (HWC) workforce in Tasmania, Australia, and its potential to inform the delivery of healthcare services within rural communities.
METHODS: Census data (2011 and 2016) were obtained for all workers involved in health, welfare and care service provision in Tasmania and in each statistical level 4 area (SA4) of the state. Workers were grouped into seven categories: medicine, nursing, allied health, dentistry and oral health, health-other, welfare and carers. Data were aggregated for each category to obtain total headcount, total full time equivalent (FTE) positions and total annual hours of service per capita, with changes observed over the five-year period.
RESULTS: All categories of the Tasmanian HWC workforce except welfare grew between 2011 and 2016. While this growth occurred in all SA4 regions across the state, the HWC workforce remained maldistributed, with more annual hours of service per capita provided in the Hobart area. Although the HWC workforce remained highly feminised, a move toward gender balance was observed in some categories, including medicine, dentistry and oral health, and carers. The HWC workforce also saw an increase in part-time workers across all categories.
CONCLUSIONS: Adopting a broad approach to health workforce planning can better reflect the reality of healthcare service delivery. For underserviced rural communities, recognising the diverse range of workers who can contribute to the provision of health, welfare and care services offers the opportunity to realise existing workforce capacity and explore how 'total care' may be delivered by different combinations of health, welfare and care workers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tasmania; carers; health workforce; rural health; welfare

Year:  2021        PMID: 34209098      PMCID: PMC8297215          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18137014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  12 in total

Review 1.  Australian physiotherapy workforce at a glance: a narrative review.

Authors:  Adri Pretorius; Nuresha Karunaratne; Susan Fehring
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Demographics of the Australian orthotic and prosthetic workforce 2007-12.

Authors:  Emily Ridgewell; Michael Dillon; Jackie O'Connor; Sarah Anderson; Leigh Clarke
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Health workforce design for the 21st century.

Authors:  Stephen J Duckett
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  The South Australian Allied Health Workforce survey: helping to fill the evidence gap in primary health workforce planning.

Authors:  Deirdre Whitford; Tony Smith; Jonathan Newbury
Journal:  Aust J Prim Health       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.307

5.  Hours worked and patient visits provided by dentists in Australia.

Authors:  D S Brennan; S Chrisopoulos; D N Teusner
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 2.291

6.  Shape of allied health: an environmental scan of 27 allied health professions in Victoria.

Authors:  Susan A Nancarrow; Gretchen Young; Katy O'Callaghan; Mathew Jenkins; Kathleen Philip; Kegan Barlow
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Age-related differences in working hours among male and female GPs: an SMS-based time use study.

Authors:  Daniël van Hassel; Lud van der Velden; Dinny de Bakker; Ronald Batenburg
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2017-12-19

8.  A workforce survey of Australian chiropractic: the profile and practice features of a nationally representative sample of 2,005 chiropractors.

Authors:  Jon Adams; Romy Lauche; Wenbo Peng; Amie Steel; Craig Moore; Lyndon G Amorin-Woods; David Sibbritt
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  How evidence-based workforce planning in Australia is informing policy development in the retention and distribution of the health workforce.

Authors:  Ian F Crettenden; Maureen V McCarty; Bethany J Fenech; Troy Heywood; Michelle C Taitz; Sam Tudman
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2014-02-03

10.  Headcount and FTE data in the European health workforce monitoring and planning process.

Authors:  Edmond Girasek; Eszter Kovács; Zoltán Aszalós; Edit Eke; Károly Ragány; Réka Kovács; Zoltán Cserháti; Miklós Szócska
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2016-07-16
View more
  1 in total

1.  Healthcare Providers' Perceptions of Potentially Preventable Rural Hospitalisations: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Andrew Ridge; Gregory M Peterson; Bastian M Seidel; Vinah Anderson; Rosie Nash
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.