| Literature DB >> 34208406 |
Isabel Vidoy-Mercado1,2, Isabel Narváez2, Elena Palomo-Ríos2, Richard E Litz3, Araceli Barceló-Muñoz1, Fernando Pliego-Alfaro2.
Abstract
Trees have a distinctive and generally long juvenile period during which vegetative growth rate is rapid and floral organs do not differentiate. Among trees, the juvenile period can range from 1 year to 15-20 years, although with some forest tree species, it can be longer. Vegetative propagation of trees is usually much easier during the juvenile phase than with mature phase materials. Therefore, reversal of maturity is often necessary in order to obtain materials in which rooting ability has been restored. Micrografting has been developed for trees to address reinvigoration/rejuvenation of elite selections to facilitate vegetative propagation. Generally, shoots obtained after serial grafting have increased rooting competence and develop juvenile traits; in some cases, graft-derived shoots show enhanced in vitro proliferation. Recent advances in graft signaling have shown that several factors, e.g., plant hormones, proteins, and different types of RNA, could be responsible for changes in the scion. The focus of this review includes (1) a discussion of the differences between the juvenile and mature growth phases in trees, (2) successful restoration of juvenile traits through micrografting, and (3) the nature of the different signals passing through the graft union.Entities:
Keywords: in vitro grafting; long distance signaling; reinvigoration; rejuvenation; rooting capacity; woody plants
Year: 2021 PMID: 34208406 PMCID: PMC8231136 DOI: 10.3390/plants10061197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Hypocotyl micrografting in olive. Graft establishment through insertion of nodal section with lateral buds onto the hypocotyl; a silicone ring is used to hold the graft union (A). Sprouted shoots after 8 weeks in OM medium supplemented with zeatin (B). Bar: 1 cm.
Woody species in which the micrografting of adult scions onto juvenile rootstocks was used to reinvigorate/rejuvenate the scion. Evaluation of changes in the scion other than increased growth was included.
| Species | Scion Source | Scion Size | Mineral Formulation + Growth Regulators | Morphogenic Response | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Greenhouse grown plants, 4–5 years old | Shoot tips | MS | Rooting: 13.3% after one graft vs. 0% for ungrafted adult shoots | [ | |
| Actively growing shoots collected in spring from mature plants growing in a glasshouse | Nodal segment (1–2 cm) with a lateral bud | MS | Rooting for ‘Fino de Jete’, ‘Bonita’ and ‘Pazicas’ after 3 micrografts: 70, 60, and 50%, respectively | [ | |
| Mature trees | Shoot tips (2 mm) | Liquid MS | Both materials showed similar performance | [ | |
| In vitro shoots from nodal sections of a 20-year-old elite tree | Shoot apices (5–10 mm) | ½ MS | Rooting capacity of shoots after 5 micrografts was 75% vs. 0% for ungrafted and 100% juvenile shoots | [ | |
| Flowering-age | Lateral buds with a stem piece at the base | MS + BA | Rooting: ca 50% vs. 0% (ungrafted shoots) | [ | |
| Mature plants grafted in the greenhouse | Lateral buds with a stem piece at the base | N45K macroelements + MS microelements + BA | Rooting after 13 micrografts was 56% vs. 5% and 84% for adult and juvenile shoots, respectively | [ | |
| Grafted plants growing in a greenhouse and nodal explants cultured in vitro | Apical or axillary bud (5–10 mm) | Liquid ½ MS | Rooting of microcuttings obtained after 1 and 3 micrografts were 4 and 40% respectively, vs. 71 for juvenile material | [ | |
|
| |||||
| In vitro shoots maintained for 10 years from ‘forced’ branch segments of adult trees grafted for 75 years | Shoot apices (20 mm) | WPM + BA | Rooting capacity after 3 micrografts: ca 50% (similar to ungrafted controls) | [ | |
| In vitro shoots maintained for 28 years from the crown of an 80 year-old tree | Nodal segments (10 mm) | WPM + BA | After 5 micrografts and subsequent in vitro subculturing, multiplication and rooting rates were similar to material from basal sprouts of the same tree | [ | |
| Mature trees | - | DKW + BA + IBA | After 2 micrografts, rooting capacity did not increase significantly; however, successive subculturing improved rooting | [ | |
| Field-grown adult plants of 3 cultivars and JTE-F rootstock | Shoot tips | ½ MS + Wuxal | The JTE-F rootstock was successfully established in vitro, while grafted material of the 3 cultivars died after 2–3 subcultures | [ | |
| Mature trees (rooted cuttings growing in a greenhouse for 12 years) | Terminal shoots (10–15 mm) | DKW + BA + IBA | Rooting after 1 micrograft 57% vs. 2% for ungrafted shoots | [ | |
| Mature plants (rooted cuttings growing in a greenhouse for 4 years) | Lateral meristems (10–15 mm) | OM + Z | Shoot elongation improved with serial grafting | [ | |
| Severely pruned mature tree growing in a greenhouse | Nodal segments | OM + Z | In vitro rooting increased with grafting (13% for 1st vs. 61% for 5th micrograft) | [ | |
|
| |||||
|
|
6 month-old seedlings (juvenile) 3–5 year-old seedings (mature) | Shoot apical portions (0.3–0.4 mm) | ½ MS | Scions of juvenile and adult origin were micrografted successfully, although those of juvenile origin elongated faster | [ |
|
| Lower part of the crown of 5- to 12-year-old trees | Shoot apices (0.2–0.4 mm) | ½ MS | Some of the scions had composed or pinnate leaves characteristic of the juvenile stage | [ |
| Mature trees >30 years old | Shoot tips (2–4 cm) | MS | Morphogenic characters after 2 micrografts (height, internodal distance, stem phenotype, capacity for adventitious shoot formation) were similar to juvenile plants | [ | |
| Suckers obtained from root fragments of a 40-year old tree grown in the greenhouse | 5–10 mm stem sections with an axillary bud | ½ MS | Rooting percentages and scion growth after 3 micrografts were 75% and 5.1 cm, similar to juvenile material (85% and 6.7 cm) | [ | |
| Grafted plants from clones PB 235 and IRCA 18 selected in 1950 and 1970, respectively | Shoot tips | MB + IBA + BA | Rooting capacity of 70% after 1 micrograft and 3 culture cycles vs. 3% for mature control in clone PB 235 | [ | |
| 2–3-year old grafted plants from PB 235 and GTI clones selected in 1950 and 1920, respectively | Shoot tips (1–2 mm) | MB + IBA + BA | Rooting of 60% after 1 micrograft vs. 0% for mature control in clone PB 235 | [ | |
| Cuttings from 20-year-old trees grown in greenhouse for one year Nodal sections from these plants cultured in vitro for a month prior to use as microscions | Shoot apex | MS + BA | Rooting percentages were 25% (juvenile), 21% (adult) and 29% (adult after 3 micrografts) | [ | |
|
| |||||
| 140-year-old trees | Terminal bud with removed bud scale | B | Micrografts were transferred to the greenhouse where they had plagiotropic growth | [ | |
| 140-year-old trees | Shoot tips (apical dome and first ring of leaf primordia, 0.3–0.5 mm in diameter) | Autoclaved Jiffy-7 peat pellets in sealed Petri dishes | After micrograft acclimatisation, material could be multiplied in vitro | [ | |
| Rooted cuttings from an 18-year-old tree | Apical meristems 0.1–0.25 mm length | Margara macronutrients + MS micronutrients | Some grafted shoots showed active growth and juvenility | [ | |
| 30-year-old grafted trees | Needle fascicle with sheath removed | 1/3 QL macronutrients + MS microelements + NAA + BA | Grafted material could be established in vitro; after 6 months they showed similar growth rates as juvenile shoots | [ | |
| 9-year-old trees | Apical bud (2 mm) | QL | Heterografts on | [ | |
| 3–4 year-old rooted cuttings from a 15-year-old tree | Apical meristems (0.1–0.25 mm) | ½ QL macronutrients + MS micronutrients | Scion responses were variable: from resting buds to actively growing juvenile-like shoots | [ | |
| In vitro stocks established from a 500-year-old tree | Shoot apices (4–5 mm) | MER | Some scions showed morphological and physiological juvenile traits | [ | |
| In vitro stocks established from mature trees | 1.5 cm long shoots | MS | After 4 grafts, shoots rooted at a 100% rate similar to seedlings vs. 20% rooting for grafted adult | [ | |
| Phosphorylation of 32-kDa protein occurred in adult material while 31-kDa protein appeared phosphorylated in juvenile and grafted shoots | [ | ||||
| Appearance of isoperoxidases and isoesterases in grafted and juvenile shoots | [ | ||||
| Four small mtDNA molecules associated with juvenile and rejuvenated shoots | [ | ||||
| Higher level of miR156 in juvenile and micrografted shoots in relation to adult material while an opposite trend was observed for miR172 | [ | ||||
B-formulation [82]; BA (6-benzyladenine); DKW (Driver and Kuniyuki, [83]); IBA (indole-3-butyric acid); MB [84]; MER (Root elongation medium, [85]); MS (Murashige and Skoog, [86]); N45K (MS macroelements modified as [87]); NAA (naphthalene acetic acid); OM (Olive medium, [88]); QL (Quoirin and Lepoivre, [89]); WPM (Woody Plant Medium, [90]); Z (zeatin); ZR (zeatin riboside).
Woody species in which the micrografting technique was used to induce growth of the scions.
| Species | Scion Source | Scion Size | Mineral Formulation + Growth Regulators | Observations | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| In vitro shoots from grafts (1–2-years old) of adult material maintained in the greenhouse | Shoot apices (6–15 mm) | Liquid MS with ½ macronutrients | Elongation of scion | [ | |
|
| |||||
| In vitro shoots | Shoots of uniform size and diameter | MS + BA + GA3 + IBA | One month after grafting, growth of scions was evident | [ | |
| In vitro shoots | Shoot tips (≈30 mm) | ½ MS + Wuxal | Four weeks after acclimatization of grafts, scion length reached minimum 10 cm with several leaves | [ | |
| I. Adult trees growing in urban zone: | Apical segments (with 2–3 pairs of axillary buds) | MS + 2-iP | Better shoot development and axillary shoot formation in scions from grafted plants than those derived from urban zone-grown plants | [ | |
| In vitro shoots | Shoot tips (8–10 mm long) containing 2–3 axillary buds | Liquid MS | Enhanced growth of the scion and development of axillary shoots | [ | |
|
Juvenile (1-year-old) grown in greenhouse Mature trees (5–10-30-year-old) in an orchard In vitro shoots from mature trees | Shoot tips (5–10 mm) | MS | Age of explant source strongly affected shoot development with poorer elongation as age increased | [ | |
|
Mature tree (30-year-old) in orchard In vitro shoots (maintained for 1 year) | Shoot tips (4–6 mm) | MS + BA | Better growth with explants derived from in vitro cultures than with scions obtained directly from the tree | [ | |
| In vitro shoots | Shoots tips (4–15 mm) | MS + BA + IBA | Grafted scions showed an increase in shoot elongation and vigorous growth | [ | |
| In vitro shoots from field-grown mature trees | Shoot tips (meristem plus 2–3 leaf primordia) (>5 mm) | WPM + BA + IBA | Scions showed noticeable length increase, axillary shoot development, and formation of new buds | [ | |
|
| |||||
| In vitro stocks from 2-day-old seedling and a 15-year-old tree | Shoot tips (2–8 mm) | MS | % of elongated buds was higher for juvenile scions (82%); for mature scions, a preculture step induced 42% bud elongation while for direct grafting it was 12% | [ | |
| Materials from a 50–60 year-old field-grown tree or after in vitro establishment | Shoot tips (1–2 cm) | Liquid ½ MS | In vitro grown shoots gave better response than scions from the field | [ | |
|
| |||||
| 5 genotypes of 11-year-old trees | Needles from fascicles with sheath removed | ½ WPM | Genotype effect regarding establishment and developmental rate with 43% average success | [ | |
| 6-year-old trees | Apical bud excised from brachyblasts | QL + IBA + BA | Apical buds in grafts established during summer gave better response | [ | |
BA (6-benzyladenine); GA3 (Gibberellic acid); IBA (indole-3-butyric acid); MS (Murashige and Skoog, [86]); 2-iP (2-isopentenyl adenine); QL (Quoirin and Lepoivre, [89]); WPM (Woody Plant Medium, [90]).