| Literature DB >> 34207483 |
Wei Zhu1,2, Xueliang Jiang1,3,4, Kun Jiang1,3, Fangjun Liu1,3, Feng You1,3, Chu Yao1,3.
Abstract
A highly efficient adsorbent for methylene blue (MB) adsorption was developed by combination of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and graphene oxide (GO) via a simple one-step hydrothermal method. The as-synthesized CMC/GO composite aerogel has a mesoporous structure with an average pore diameter of 30 nm and a high specific surface area of 800.85 m2·g-1. Moreover, the CMC/GO composite aerogel demonstrates a significant selectivity for the dye adsorption, especially for MB, where its adsorption capacity can reach 244.99 mg·g-1 with an excellent recyclability for more than nine times. Thus, the prepared CMC/GO composite aerogel would be an effective adsorbent for dyes adsorption, owing to the merits of high efficiency, reusability, and eco-friendliness.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; aerogel; carboxymethyl cellulose; graphene; methylene blue; reusability
Year: 2021 PMID: 34207483 PMCID: PMC8234820 DOI: 10.3390/nano11061609
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(A) FT-IR spectra of (a) CMC/GO aerogel and (b) GO aerogel. (B) XRD patterns of aerogels: (a) CMC, (b) GO, and (c) CMC/GO. (C) the N2 adsorption and desorption curves of GO aerogel. (D) the N2 adsorption and desorption curves of CMC/GO composite aerogel.
Pore structure analysis.
| Sample | BET (m2·g−1) | Pore Volume (cm3·g−1) | Pore Diameter (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GO | 65.01 | 0.70 | 34.09 |
| CMC/GO | 800.85 | 0.45 | 30.13 |
Figure 2SEM image of aerogels: (A) GO and (B) CMC/GO. TEM image of CMC/GO (C,D).
Figure 3(A) advancing contact angle of GO, (B) receding contact angle of GO, and (C) contact angle of CMC/GO.
Figure 4(A) adsorption properties of MB on CMC/GO (a) and GO (b) aerogels. (B) influence of proportion of materials ratio (mCMC:mGO) (a = 2:1, b = 1:1, c = 1:2). (C) influence of pH. (D) adsorption properties of CMC/GO composite aerogel on different dyes.
Figure 5Adsorption rate and adsorption capacity of MB adsorbed by CMC/GO composite aerogel for 9 times.
Comparison of circulation performance of different adsorbents.
| Adsorbents | Cycle Number | Last Adsorption Capacity/First Adsorption Capacity | References | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVA-based nanocomposite hydrogels | 4 | 93% | [ | 2017 |
| PVA/PCMC/GO/bentonite | 4 | 92.39% | [ | 2018 |
| MnO2 nanowires/PU foam composites | 5 | 91.9% | [ | 2016 |
| Starch-humic acid composite | 5 | 97% | [ | 2015 |
| Magnetic carboxymethyl starch/poly(vinyl alcohol)composite gel | 8 | 85% | [ | 2015 |
| Novel carboxymethyl cellulose/carboxylated graphene oxide composite microbeads | 9 | 90% | [ | 2020 |
| CMC/GO composite aerogel | 9 | 92.66% | This work | 2021 |
Figure 6(A) Langmuir adsorption isotherm and (B) Freundlich adsorption isotherm of CMC/GO. (C) fitting diagram of quasi-first-order adsorption kinetics model and (D) quasi-secondary adsorption kinetics model.
Thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of MB on CMC/GO composite aerogel.
| T(K) | lnKd | ΔGӨ(KJ·moL−1) | ΔHӨ(KJ·moL−1) | ΔSӨ(KJ·moL−1·K−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 288.15 | 1.717 | −4.675 | 10.718 | 0.0516 |
| 298.15 | 1.83 | |||
| 308.15 | 2.01 |
Figure 7Schematic illustration of the MB adsorption by the CMC/GO composite aerogel.
Adsorption performance of different adsorbents for MB.
| Adsorbents | Maximum Adsorption Capacity (mg·g−1) | References | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carboxymethyl cellulose/carboxylated graphene oxide composite microbeads | 180.23 | [ | 2020 |
| Pineapple peel carboxy methylcellulose-g-poly | 133.32 | [ | 2019 |
| Polyvinyl alcohol/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels | 172.14 | [ | 2018 |
| Poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogel | 80.27 | [ | 2018 |
| Pineapple peel cellulose-g-acrylic acid/kaolin/sepia ink hydrogels | 153.85 | [ | 2017 |
| Modified pineapple peel cellulose hydrogels embedded with sepia ink | 138.25 | [ | 2016 |
| Starch-humic acid composite hydrogel | 110.00 | [ | 2015 |
| Guaran/poly(itaconic acid) hydrogel | 106.04 | [ | 2015 |
| Magnetic starch/poly(vinyl alcohol) composite hydrogel | 23.53 | [ | 2015 |
| CMC/GO composite aerogel | 246.42 | This study | 2021 |