| Literature DB >> 34207348 |
Cosmin Vancea1, Giannin Mosoarca1, Simona Popa1.
Abstract
The sustainable economy framework imposes the adoption of new ways for waste reuse and recycling. In this context, this paper proposes a new alternative to obtain glass fertilizers (agriglasses) by reusing two cheap and easily available wastes, wood ash and manganese rich sludge resulting from drinking water treatment processes for groundwater sources. Glasses were obtained using different amounts of wastes together with (NH4)2HPO4 and K2CO3 as raw materials. The P-K-Mn nutrient solubilization from the obtained glasses was investigated using a citric acid solution. The kinetics of the leaching process was studied after 1, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, respectively. The intraparticle diffusion model was used to interpret kinetic data. Two distinct stages of the ion leaching process were recorded for all of the studied compositions: first through intraparticle diffusion (the rate-controlling stage) and second through diffusion through the particle-medium interface. The fertilization effect of the obtained agriglasses was studied on a barley crop. The specific plant growth parameters of germination percentage, average plant height, biomass and relative growth rate were determinate. The positive impact of the agriglasses upon the plants biomass and relative growth rate was highlighted. The effects of agriglasses can be tuned through glass compositions that affect the solubility of the nutrients.Entities:
Keywords: cheap wastes; glass fertilizers; manganese sludge; plant growth parameters; wood ash
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34207348 PMCID: PMC8296455 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Oxide composition of used fir wood ash.
| Oxide | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | MnO2 | Na2O | K2O | CaO | MgO | P2O5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | 38.52 | 2.27 | 1.74 | 2.67 | 0.27 | 15.57 | 26.63 | 7.40 | 4.93 |
Wood ash content and corresponding oxide composition of the studied glass fertilizers.
| Sample | S0 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wood ash amount (mg g−1) | 0 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 100 |
| Corresponding agriglasses’ molar oxide composition | ||||||
| SiO2 (%) | 3.72 | 5.43 | 8.23 | 10.59 | 12.00 | 13.05 |
| Al2O3 (%) | 0.00 | 2.49 | 3.78 | 4.87 | 5.51 | 6.00 |
| Fe2O3 (%) | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.30 |
| MnO (%) | 0.00 | 2.84 | 6.13 | 7.66 | 8.28 | 8.91 |
| Na2O (%) | 16.55 | 22.91 | 18.72 | 16.42 | 14.22 | 12.40 |
| K2O (%) | 18.99 | 1.53 | 2.32 | 3.63 | 8.81 | 10.97 |
| CaO (%) | 15.94 | 1.95 | 2.98 | 3.82 | 4.34 | 6.77 |
| MgO (%) | 13.39 | 2.26 | 11.36 | 12.81 | 12.37 | 11.68 |
| P2O5 (%) | 31.42 | 60.46 | 46.29 | 39.95 | 34.18 | 29.93 |
Figure 1Synthesized agriglass samples.
Figure 2UV–VIS spectra of the obtained agriglass samples.
Figure 3Ions dissolution from the studied glasses.
Linear regression equations and corresponding coefficients of determination for ions leaching dissolution.
| Sample | S0 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ion Leached | Phosphorous | |||||
| Equation | y = 1.3888x + 1.2904 | y = 2.3681x − 1.1212 | y = 2.0519x − 0.7908 | y = 1.5497x + 0.3149 | y = 1.3305x + 0.5071 | y = 1.1357x + 1.2584 |
| R² | 0.9982 | 0.9853 | 0.9765 | 0.9722 | 0.9802 | 0.9845 |
| Ion leached | Potassium | |||||
| Equation | y = 0.6598x + 7.9997 | y = 0.2985x + 0.1971 | y = 0.5917x + 0.994 | y = 0.5917x + 0.994 | y = 0.6137x + 4.7697 | y = 0.5928x + 7.5082 |
| R² | 0.978 | 0.9846 | 0.9827 | 0.9827 | 0.9896 | 0.9805 |
| Ion leached | Manganese | |||||
| Equation | y = 0.0373x + 0.1163 | y = 0.1738x + 0.0092 | y = 0.231x + 0.1296 | y = 0.3341x + 0.0054 | y = 0.4444x + 0.3635 | |
| R² | 0.9807 | 0.9826 | 0.9499 | 0.9758 | 0.9849 | |
Figure 4Intraparticle diffusion model plot for the investigated glasses: (a) phosphorous ions; (b) potassium ions; (c) manganese ions.
Intraparticle diffusion parameters for both steps for phosphorous, potassium and manganese ions leaching kinetics.
| Sample | S0 | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ion leached | Phosphorous | |||||
| Step 1 | ||||||
| kt | 0.1393 | 0.1837 | 0.1521 | 0.1125 | 0.0993 | 0.0971 |
| C | 22.361 | 36.916 | 34.140 | 31.057 | 29.159 | 27.754 |
| R² | 0.9758 | 0.9841 | 0.9611 | 0.9995 | 0.9924 | 0.9864 |
| Step 2 | ||||||
| kt | 0.2391 | 0.4613 | 0.4122 | 0.333 | 0.3044 | 0.2431 |
| C | 24.087 | 41.611 | 38.559 | 34.934 | 32.925 | 30.452 |
| R² | 0.9997 | 0.9806 | 0.9712 | 0.965 | 0.9968 | 0.9964 |
| Ion leached | Potassium | |||||
| Step 1 | ||||||
| kt | 0.0685 | 0.0212 | 0.0515 | 0.056 | 0.0633 | 0.0671 |
| C | 16.148 | 1.1004 | 1.9337 | 2.9437 | 7.2967 | 9.1585 |
| R² | 0.9780 | 0.9745 | 0.9692 | 0.9864 | 0.9814 | 0.9746 |
| Step 2 | ||||||
| kt | 0.1023 | 0.0632 | 0.1042 | 0.1148 | 0.0954 | 0.0819 |
| C | 16.665 | 1.8335 | 2.7895 | 3.9504 | 7.7943 | 9.3389 |
| R² | 0.9358 | 0.9944 | 0.9753 | 0.9952 | 0.9918 | 0.9915 |
| Ion leached | Manganese | |||||
| Step 1 | ||||||
| kt | 0.0045 | 0.0124 | 0.0163 | 0.0239 | 0.0407 | |
| C | 1.4159 | 3.4269 | 4.4605 | 4.9908 | 5.5832 | |
| R² | 0.9887 | 0.9871 | 0.996 | 0.9865 | 0.9955 | |
| Step 2 | ||||||
| kt | 0.005 | 0.04 | 0.0575 | 0.0785 | 0.0926 | |
| C | 1.4224 | 3.9313 | 5.2431 | 6.0011 | 6.5639 | |
| R² | 0.9887 | 0.9954 | 0.9393 | 0.981 | 0.9496 | |
Figure 5pH evolution over time for studied glasses.
Figure 6The main specific parameters of plants growth: (I) germination percent; (II) plant average length; (III) biomass; (IV) relative growth rate. Values are expressed as means of three replicates and error bars represent the standard deviation. Columns denoted by different letters indicated significant (p < 0.01) differences among different agriglass compositions.