| Literature DB >> 34207017 |
Muluken Dessalegn Muluneh1,2, Lyn Francis2, Mhiret Ayele1, Sintayehu Abebe1, Misrak Makonnen1, Virginia Stulz3.
Abstract
This study examines the associations between women's empowerment and family planning use in Jimma Zone, Western Ethiopia. A total of 746 randomly selected married women of reproductive age were interviewed. The data were employed by structural equation modelling (SEM) to investigate the complex and multidimensional pathways to show women's empowerment domains in family planning utilisation. Results of the study revealed that 72% of married women had used family planning. Younger women, having access to information, having access to health facilities and being aware about family planning methods, living in a rural area, having an older partner and increased household decision-making power were associated with using family planning methods. Women's empowerment is an important determinant of contraceptive use. Women's empowerment dimensions included increased household decision-making power, socio-demographic variables and having access to information about family planning and accessible health facilities. These were found to be important determinants of contraceptive use. Future interventions should focus on integrating women's empowerment into family planning programming, particularly in enhancing women's autonomy in decision making. Further research is warranted on the socio-cultural context of women that influences women's empowerment and family planning use to establish an in-depth understanding and equity of women in society.Entities:
Keywords: decision making; family planning; women’s empowerment
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34207017 PMCID: PMC8296516 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126550
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Conceptual framework.
Sociodemographic features of the respondents and their partners, Western Ethiopia, 2020.
| Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Educational status of women | ||
| Illiterate | 386 | 51.70 |
| Primary (1–8) | 276 | 37.00 |
| Low secondary (9–10) | 62 | 8.30 |
| Secondary and above | 22 | 3.00 |
| Partner education status | ||
| Illiterate | 299 | 40.08 |
| Primary (1–8) | 355 | 47.59 |
| Low secondary (9–10) | 55 | 7.37 |
| Secondary and above | 37 | 4.96 |
| Employment | ||
| Not employed | 701 | 93.97 |
| Employed | 45 | 6.03 |
| Religious denomination | ||
| Muslim | 723 | 96.92 |
| Christian | 23 | 3.08 |
| Main source of income for the family | ||
| Land cultivation | 454 | 60.86 |
| Small business | 137 | 18.36 |
| Husbandry | 102 | 13.67 |
| Paid job | 26 | 3.49 |
| Labour | 23 | 3.08 |
| Other | 4 | 0.53 |
| Access to sources of information | ||
| Yes | 469 | 62.87 |
| No | 277 | 37.13 |
Birth, age at first marriage and fertility among married women in Jimma Zone, Western Ethiopia, 2020.
| Have You Ever Given Birth? | Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 723 | 96.92 | |
| No | 23 | 3.08 | |
| How many children do you have in your life (both alive and dead)? | Mean | Median | SD |
| 4.02 | 4.00 | 2.44 | |
| Total number of children alive | 3.63 | 3.00 | 2.22 |
| Birth interval | Frequency | Percentage | |
| One year | 125 | 16.76 | |
| Two years | 220 | 29.49 | |
| Three years | 245 | 32.84 | |
| Four years | 79 | 10.59 | |
| More than four years | 54 | 7.24 | |
| Does your husband/partner have another partner? | |||
| No | 637 | 85.39 | |
| Yes | 109 | 14.61 | |
Aspects of household decision-making power in Jimma Zone, Western Ethiopia in 2020.
| Decision-Making Dimension (N = 746) | Joint or Alone Percent | Husband or Someone Else (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| In your household who usually makes decisions about large household purchases | 68.23 | 31.77 |
|
| In your household who usually decides to visit your family, relatives | 24.26 | 75.74 |
|
| In your household who usually makes decisions about the health care of the women | 19.84 | 80.16 |
Respondent’s attitude towards physical violence towards wives in Jimma Zone, Western Ethiopia, 2020.
| Indicator | Yes (%) | No (%) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In your opinion, is a husband justified in physical violence towards his wife in the following situations: | ||||
| 1 | If she goes out without telling him? | 66.62 | 33.38 | 100 |
| 2 | If she neglects the children? | 58.71 | 41.29 | 100 |
| 3 | If she argues with him? | 52.55 | 47.45 | 100 |
| 4 | If she refuses to have sex with him? | 40.21 | 59.79 | 100 |
| 5 | If she burns the food? | 45.84 | 54.16 | 100 |
Factor analysis for indicators of empowerment (n = 746), Jimma Zone, Western Ethiopia, 2020.
| Latent Construct | Aspects Asked about | Factor Loadings (EFA) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision-making power | Decisions on big household purchases | 0.244 | |
| Decisions on own health care | 0.591 | 0.000 | |
| Decisions on going to public meetings | 0.635 | 0.000 | |
| Attitude towards physical violence | Physical violence if she neglects children | 0.825 | |
| Physical violence if she argues with her partner | 0.755 | 0.000 | |
| Physical violence if she burns food | 0.695 | 0.000 | |
| Physical violence if she goes out without telling her partner | 0.745 | 0.000 | |
| Physical violence if she refuses to have sex | 0.825 | 0.000 |
In Table 5, the path of the first indicator is constrained to 1, thus the significance value or p value was not calculated. Other variable factor loadings are significant at p < 0.05. The model’s fit was calculated by comparative fit index (CFI = 0.945), root mean square error approximation (RMSEA = 0.080), standardised root mean square residual (SRMR = 0.043).
Standardised path coefficients of the latent variable SEM (n = 746), Western Ethiopia, 2020.
| Predictors in the Equation (X): | Dependent Variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude Towards Violence | Decision-Making Power | Use of Family Planning | |
| Endogenous variables | |||
| 1. Decision-making power | 0.101 * | ||
| 2.Attitude towards violence | 0.104 ** | ||
| Exogenous variables | |||
| Current age of the women | 0.089 * | 0.463 *** | |
| Having access to information | 0.192 *** | ||
| Having access to a health facility | 0.140 *** | ||
| Having awareness about contraceptives | −0.118 ** | 0.240 *** | |
| Husband being employed | 0.091 ** | ||
| Age of the husband | −0.338 ** | −0.126 * | |
| Being from middle and higher wealth class | −0.114 *** | ||
| Rural residence | −0.085 ** | ||
| Occupation/no job or farmer | |||
| Religion | |||
| If she ever faced any form of violence | −0.116 ** | ||
| If she or husband has no habit of alcohol consumption | 0.153 *** | ||
| Partner not having habit of chewing/drinking | 0.195 ** | 0.262 *** | |
| Has exposure to education | 0.200 *** | ||
| Source of income | 0.153 ** | ||
| Husband being literate | 0.223 ** | ||
*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Figure 2Structural equation model.