| Literature DB >> 34206922 |
Tsung-Han Lee1,2, Lung-Chieh Chen2, Erick Wang2, Chin-Cheng Wang2, Yan-Ren Lin1,3,4, Wen-Liang Chen2.
Abstract
Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) plays an important role in the assessment of various cardiac diseases. However, accurate detection of cTnI at the point-of-care (POC) remains unfeasible. In this study, we report the development of an electrochemical immunosensor designed for rapid and accurate cTnI detection in pre-hospital settings. Rapid cTnI analysis of whole blood samples was then performed. cTnI measurements were highly correlated with the results of the standard clinical laboratory method for cTnI detection. The results of this study suggest that the proposed POC immunosensor can deliver fast and accurate cTnI analysis in pre-hospital settings to achieve rapid diagnosis and guide patient management.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac troponin I; immunosensor; point-of-care
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34206922 PMCID: PMC8301894 DOI: 10.3390/bios11070210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1Establishment of immunosensor for cTnI detection in whole blood samples. (A) Detection procedure used to obtain standard curves. (B) Investigation of consistency of individual anti-mouse cTnI antibody modified biochips after functionalization. (C) Investigation of consistency of individual anti-human cTnI antibody modified biochips after functionalization. (D) Standard curve of mouse cTnI (analysis was performed in triplicate). (E) Standard curve of human cTnI (analysis was performed in triplicate).
Figure 2Establishment of cardiac damage mouse model. (A) Schedule of ISO injection in Balb/c mice. Mice were randomized into Group A (0.5 mL saline), Group B (100 mg/kg ISO in saline), and Group C (200 mg/kg ISO in saline). (B) IHC staining of heart tissue from mice in different groups at 100× and 400× magnification. Areas that were magnified to produce 400× images are boxed in red. (C) Statistical analysis of differences in cTnI measurements obtained using immunosensor between mice from the three groups. ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. (D) Correlation between immunosensor detection method and standard clinical laboratory detection method in mouse model samples.
Weight, heart rate, and cTnI measurements of the cardiac damage mouse model. All figures are expressed as Mean ± SEM, (N = 7 in control group and N = 5 in other groups), * p < 0.05 vs. weight before ISO injection, † p < 0.05 vs. heart rates before ISO injection, ‡ p < 0.05 vs. control group by standard clinical laboratory ELISA.
| Group | Weight (g) | Heart Rate (min−1) | Weight (g) | Heart Rate (min−1) | Troponin-I (ng/dL) by ELISA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 26.28 ± 0.71 | 566.14 ± 51.32 | 26.24 ± 0.70 | 570.29 ± 37.30 | 0.003 ± 0.001 |
| Group B | 26.22 ± 0.86 | 570.80 ± 57.76 | 25.54 ± 1.1 * | 595.00 ± 46.27 † | 1.06 ± 0.42 ‡ |
| Group C | 26.14 ± 0.54 | 568.40 ± 77.58 | 25.38 ± 0.63 * | 591.82 ± 56.61 † | 1.50 ± 0.99 ‡ |
Figure 3Comparison of immunosensor detection method to standard clinical laboratory detection method in human blood samples.