| Literature DB >> 34206895 |
Iulia Nedelcu1,2, Raluca Jipa1,2, Roxana Vasilescu3, Cristian Băicuș1,4, Costin-Ioan Popescu5, Eliza Manea1,2, Laura E Stoichițoiu4, Larisa Pinte1,4, Anca Damalan2, Oana Simulescu3, Irina Stoica3, Madalina Stoica3, Adriana Hristea1,2.
Abstract
The number of serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 has skyrocketed in the past year. Concerns have been raised regarding their performance characteristics, depending on the disease severity and the time of the analysis post-symptom onset (PSO). Thus, independent validations using an unbiased sample selection are required for meaningful serology data interpretation. We aimed to assess the clinical performance of six commercially available assays, the seroconversion, and the dynamics of the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study included 528 serum samples from 156 patients with follow-up visits up to six months PSO and 161 serum samples from healthy people. The IgG/total antibodies positive percentage increased and remained above 95% after six months when chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) IgG antiS1/S2 and electro-chemiluminescent assay (ECLIA) total antiNP were used. At early time points PSO, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) IgM antiS achieved the best sensitivity. IgM and IgG appear simultaneously in most circumstances, and when performed in parallel the sensitivity increases. The severe and the moderate clinical forms were significantly associated with higher seropositivity percentage and antibody levels. High specificity was found in all evaluated assays, but the sensitivity was variable depending on the time PSO, severity of disease, detection method and targeted antigen.Entities:
Keywords: CLIA; CMIA; COVID-19; ECLIA; ELISA; IgG; IgM; SARS-CoV-2; serological assays
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34206895 DOI: 10.3390/v13071244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048