| Literature DB >> 34206486 |
Yaghoub Pourasad1, Fausto Cavallaro2.
Abstract
At present, there is an increase in the capacity of data generated and stored in the medical area. Thus, for the efficient handling of these extensive data, the compression methods need to be re-explored by considering the algorithm's complexity. To reduce the redundancy of the contents of the image, thus increasing the ability to store or transfer information in optimal form, an image processing approach needs to be considered. So, in this study, two compression techniques, namely lossless compression and lossy compression, were applied for image compression, which preserves the image quality. Moreover, some enhancing techniques to increase the quality of a compressed image were employed. These methods were investigated, and several comparison results are demonstrated. Finally, the performance metrics were extracted and analyzed based on state-of-the-art methods. PSNR, MSE, and SSIM are three performance metrics that were used for the sample medical images. Detailed analysis of the measurement metrics demonstrates better efficiency than the other image processing techniques. This study helps to better understand these strategies and assists researchers in selecting a more appropriate technique for a given use case.Entities:
Keywords: compression enhancement; image enhancement; image processing; medical image
Year: 2021 PMID: 34206486 PMCID: PMC8297375 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18136724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Performance metric for the sample medical image.
| Index | SSIM | MSE | PSNR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DCT compressed Image | 0.976102286 | 4.15 × 10−5 | 89.97979612 |
| 2 | AHE enhancement for DCT compressed image | 0.953323544 | 0.01256723 | 82.67223261 |
| 3 | DWT compressed image | 0.060732271 | 0.555070285 | 54.76541543 |
| 4 | AHE enhancement for DWT compressed image | 0.996540627 | 4.14 × 10−5 | 86.98046733 |
| 5 | MO enhancement for DWT compressed image | 0.919275875 | 0.012887986 | 72.76504215 |
| 6 | Block truncation compressed image | 0.087685188 | 0.66648485 | 47.63287631 |
| 7 | AHE enhancement for block truncation image | 0.819149803 | 0.001717444 | 75.77798049 |
| 8 | MO enhancement for block truncation image | 0.832122574 | 0.002987536 | 69.33196602 |
| 9 | RLE compressed image | 0.48970346 | 0.299972986 | 43.72625764 |
| 10 | AHE enhancement for RLE compressed image | 0.87101654 | 0.000629014 | 70.50874365 |
| 11 | MO enhancement for RLE compressed image | 0.81224123 | 0.001335176 | 69.85366112 |
Figure 1Lossy techniques: DCT and DWT compression.
Figure 2Lossy techniques: AHE and MO Enhancement for DCT and DWT.
Figure 3Lossless techniques: Lossless compression utilizing RLE and BTC.
Figure 4Lossless techniques: Enhancement of BTC using AHE and MO.
Figure 5Lossless techniques: Enhancement of RLE using AHE and MO.
Figure 6The performance of the presented methods (a): PSNR criteria, (b): SSIM criteria.
The comparison between the presented methods and the state-of-the-art.
| Method | MSE | PSNR |
|---|---|---|
| Presented DCT | 4.15 × 10−5 | 89.98 |
| Presented DWT | 0.56 | 54.77 |
| Presented Block truncation | 0.67 | 47.63 |
| Presented RLE | 0.30 | 43.73 |
| D-CNN [ | 1.40 | 47.40 |
| BTOT [ | 2.81 | 45.90 |
| JPEG [ | 6.82 | 43.97 |
| JPEG2000 [ | 1.60 | 47.11 |