| Literature DB >> 34205530 |
Uma D Kabra1,2, Charles Affourtit3, Martin Jastroch4,5.
Abstract
The development of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been associated with impaired mitochondrial function. In pancreatic beta (β) cells, mitochondrial energy metabolism plays a central role in triggering and controlling glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). Here, we have explored whether mitochondrial bioenergetic parameters assessed with Seahorse extracellular flux technology can quantitatively predict insulin secretion. We metabolically stressed male C57BL/6 mice by high-fat feeding (HFD) and measured the glucose sensitivity of islet respiration and insulin secretion. The diet-induced obese (DIO) mice developed hyperinsulinemia, but no pathological secretory differences were apparent between isolated DIO and chow islets. Real-time extracellular flux analysis, however, revealed a lower respiratory sensitivity to glucose in DIO islets. Correlation of insulin secretion with respiratory parameters uncovers compromised insulin secretion in DIO islets by oxidative power. Normalization to increased insulin contents during DIO improves the quantitative relation between GSIS and respiration, allowing to classify dysfunctional properties of pancreatic insulin secretion, and thereby serving as valuable biomarker for pancreatic islet glucose responsiveness and health.Entities:
Keywords: bioenergetics; glucose-stimulated insulin secretion; mitochondria; pancreatic islets; respiration
Year: 2021 PMID: 34205530 PMCID: PMC8235780 DOI: 10.3390/metabo11060405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1Characterization of chow (black bars) and HFD (white bars) fed C57BL/6 mice. (A) Body weight; (B) plasma insulin level; and (C) plasma glucose levels. The mice were 8 weeks old at the start of the feeding experiment. Data are represented as ± SEM (n = 8 mice per group). Statistical significance of mean differences was tested by unpaired two-tailed student t-test. p < 0.001 (***).
Figure 2Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and mitochondrial bioenergetics of pancreatic islets from chow and HFD-fed mice. (A) Insulin secretion. Batches of eight size-matched islets were exposed to either 2 or 16.5 mM glucose for 1 h before supernatants and lysates were collected. (B) Representative time-resolved oxygen consumption traces. Batches of 30 size-matched islets were exposed to 2 mM glucose to assess basal respiration (4 cycles), glucose-stimulated respiration (10 cycles), proton leak respiration by inhibition of ATP synthase using oligomycin (10 cycles), and non-mitochondrial respiration by final injection of rotenone/antimycin A. (C) Mitochondrial basal respiration at low glucose (2 mM). (D) Glucose-stimulated respiration expressed as percentage of basal (E) Mitochondrial stimulated respiration at high glucose (16.5 mM). (F) Proton leak respiration at high glucose. (G) ATP-linked respiration at high glucose. (H) Coupling efficiency at high glucose. (I) Correlation of insulin secretion (absolute values) and ATP-linked respiration. (J) Correlation of insulin secretion (absolute values) and glucose-stimulated respiration. Data are represented as means ± SEM (n = 6 mice per group, each mouse was considered as independent experiment and islets were plated in triplicate). Statistical significance of mean differences was tested by unpaired two-tailed student t-test. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.001 (***).
Figure 3Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in chow and HFD mice. Batches of eight size-matched islets were exposed to either 2 or 16.5 mM glucose for 1 h at which point supernatants and lysates were collected for (A) insulin content, and (B) secreted insulin measurements. Correlation between insulin secretion (% content) and (C) glucose-stimulated respiration, (D) ATP-linked respiration, and (E) coupling efficiency (F) correlation model classifying defects of insulin secretion. Data are represented as means ± SEM (n = 6 mice per group, each mouse was considered as independent experiment and islets were plated in triplicate). Statistical significance of mean differences was tested by unpaired two-tailed student t-test. p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.001 (***).