Literature DB >> 34205506

Tick-Borne Surveillance Patterns in Perceived Non-Endemic Geographic Areas: Human Tick Encounters and Disease Outcomes.

Sarah P Maxwell1, Connie L McNeely2, Kevin Thomas3, Chris Brooks3.   

Abstract

Recent scholarship supports the use of tick bite encounters as a proxy for human disease risk. Extending entomological monitoring, this study was designed to provide geographically salient information on self-reported tick bite encounters by survey respondents who concomitantly reported a Lyme disease (LD) diagnosis in a state perceived as non-endemic to tick-borne illness. Focusing on Texas, a mixed-methods approach was used to compare data on tick bite encounters from self-reported LD patients with county-level confirmed cases of LD from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as well as serological canine reports. A greater proportion of respondents reported not recalling a tick bite in the study population, but a binomial test indicated that this difference was not statistically significant. A secondary analysis compared neighboring county-level data and ecological regions. Using multi-layer thematic mapping, our findings indicated that tick bite reports accurately overlapped with the geographic patterns of those patients previously known to be CDC-positive for serological LD and with canine-positive tests for Borrelia burgdorferi, anaplasmosis, and ehrlichiosis, as well as within neighboring counties and ecological regions. LD patient-reported tick bite encounters, corrected for population density, also accurately aligned with official CDC county hot-spots. Given the large number of counties in Texas, these findings are notable. Overall, the study demonstrates that direct, clinically diagnosed patient reports with county-level tick bite encounter data offer important public health surveillance measures, particularly as it pertains to difficult-to-diagnose diseases where testing protocols may not be well established. Further integration of geo-ecological and socio-demographic factors with existing national epidemiological data, as well as increasingly accessible self-report methods such as online surveys, will contribute to the contextual information needed to organize and implement a coordinated public health response to LD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  non-endemic; patient reports; surveillance; tick bite encounters; tick-borne disease

Year:  2021        PMID: 34205506     DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9060771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9032


  3 in total

1.  Assessing Tick-Borne Disease Risk and Surveillance: Toward a Multi-Modal Approach to Diagnostic Positioning and Prediction.

Authors:  Chris Brooks; Connie L McNeely; Sarah P Maxwell; Kevin C Thomas
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-04-18

2.  Triangulating the New Frontier of Health Geo-Data: Assessing Tick-Borne Disease Risk as an Occupational Hazard among Vulnerable Populations.

Authors:  Sarah P Maxwell; Connie L McNeely; Chris Brooks; Kevin Thomas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Neurological Pain, Psychological Symptoms, and Diagnostic Struggles among Patients with Tick-Borne Diseases.

Authors:  Sarah P Maxwell; Chris Brooks; Connie L McNeely; Kevin C Thomas
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.