| Literature DB >> 34205439 |
Yu-Shan Yen1, Kuei-San Chen1, Hsin-Yi Yang2, Hung-Yu Lai1,3.
Abstract
(1) Baclass="Gene">ckground: TraceEntities:
Keywords: chemical form; lettuce; pak choi; risk assessment; trace metal; vermicompost
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34205439 PMCID: PMC8296319 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126619
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
The soil properties of Ti-132 under different treatments.
| Crop and | pH | EC | OM | Avail N | Avail P | Exch Ca | Exch Mg | Exch K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dS m−1 | % | mg kg−1 | mg kg−1 | mg kg−1 | mg kg−1 | mg kg−1 | |||
| BCC | CK | 8.55 ± 0.02 A 2 | 0.10 ± 0.01 B | 1.59 ± 0.09 D | 2.25 ± 3.89 A | 19.77 ± 0.21 D | 4463.87 ± 51.38 AC | 188.42 ± 15.99 C | 142.46 ± 20.89 D |
| VRM | 8.23 ± 0.05 DE | 0.11 ± 0.01 AB | 2.87 ± 0.26 B | 6.74 ± 6.74 A | 89.00 ± 5.96 B | 4362.40 ± 15.27 BD | 368.68 ± 15.93 A | 612.03 ± 53.35 B | |
| BCW | CK | 8.49 ± 0.06 AB | 0.13 ± 0.02 AB | 1.50 ± 0.03 D | 4.49 ± 3.89 A | 20.48 ± 0.18 D | 4671.46 ± 183.82 A | 202.17 ± 19.40 C | 168.04 ± 5.88 D |
| VRM | 8.02 ± 0.12 F | 0.15 ± 0.06 A | 3.30 ± 0.43 A | 8.95 ± 10.25 A | 96.93 ± 8.38 A | 4157.62 ± 76.85 D | 394.32 ± 46.48 A | 826.88 ± 61.36 A | |
| LSC | CK | 8.37 ± 0.09 CD | 0.13 ± 0.00 AB | 1.66 ± 0.04 D | 8.99 ± 7.79 A | 20.17 ± 1.92 D | 4493.56 ± 41.67 AB | 187.68 ± 23.60 C | 140.02 ± 7.52 D |
| VRM | 8.13 ± 0.07 EF | 0.11 ± 0.00 AB | 1.81 ± 0.10 D | 8.99 ± 3.91 A | 59.25 ± 1.81 C | 4249.37 ± 102.52 CD | 300.57 ± 10.60 B | 365.66 ± 17.58 C | |
| LSS | CK | 8.38 ± 0.05 BC | 0.12 ± 0.01 AB | 1.52 ± 0.04 D | 4.47 ± 3.87 A | 21.92 ± 1.06 D | 4313.42 ± 126.94 BD | 197.49 ± 8.59 C | 149.51 ± 20.33 D |
| VRM | 8.29 ± 0.10 CD | 0.11 ± 0.00 AB | 2.21 ± 0.32 C | 6.73 ± 0.02 A | 60.30 ± 4.39 C | 4269.85 ± 255.57 BD | 296.06 ± 19.55 B | 346.35 ± 8.89 C | |
1 BCC: Brassica chinensis L. var. Chinensis; BCW: Brassica chinensis L. cv. wrinkled leaves; LSC: Lactuca sativa L. cv. Chinese; LSS: Lactuca sativa L. cv. sweet; CK: control; VRM: vermicompost; EC: electrical conductivity; OM: organic matter; Avail: available; Exch: exchangeable. 2 Mean ± standard deviation; different letters indicate significant differences across treatments as determined by one-way ANOVA analysis (LSD test, p < 0.05, n = 3).
The soil properties of the Y-400 soil under different treatments.
| Crop and | pH | EC | OM | Avail N | Avail P | Exch Ca | Exch Mg | Exch K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dS m−1 | % | mg kg−1 | mg kg−1 | mg kg−1 | mg kg−1 | mg kg−1 | |||
| BCC | CK | 7.18 ± 0.09 C 2 | 0.03 ± 0.00 D | 1.48 ± 0.04 D | 11.23 ± 3.91 BC | 5.62 ± 0.23 DE | 2059.09 ± 66.78 A | 355.36 ± 15.93 BC | 57.78 ± 2.73 E |
| VRM | 7.65 ± 0.55 A | 0.07 ± 0.01 B | 2.60 ± 0.55 B | 8.98 ± 3.89 BC | 49.28 ± 1.58 B | 2247.68 ± 88.71 A | 484.96 ± 13.35 A | 155.75 ± 12.43 B | |
| BCW | CK | 7.16 ± 0.06 C | 0.04 ± 0.01 D | 1.57 ± 0.10 D | 8.98 ± 3.87 BC | 4.88 ± 0.36 E | 1914.34 ± 46.21 A | 327.96 ± 7.82 C | 65.62 ± 9.06 DE |
| VRM | 7.54 ± 0.05 AB | 0.10 ± 0.00 A | 3.07 ± 0.35 A | 13.45 ± 0.03 BC | 54.83 ± 4.85 A | 2385.32 ± 101.12 A | 517.24 ± 20.74 A | 176.74 ± 13.93 A | |
| LSC | CK | 7.17 ± 0.06 C | 0.05 ± 0.01 C | 1.50 ± 0.10 D | 22.43 ± 3.87 A | 4.88 ± 0.40 E | 2436.52 ± 941.56 A | 355.85 ± 11.64 BC | 61.57 ± 2.98 E |
| VRM | 7.26 ± 0.03 BC | 0.07 ± 0.01 BC | 2.25 ± 0.07 BC | 11.22 ± 3.91 BC | 25.59 ± 2.01 C | 2011.13 ± 312.84 A | 393.16 ± 79.67 BC | 76.60 ± 7.02 CD | |
| LSS | CK | 7.19 ± 0.04 C | 0.04 ± 0.00 D | 1.38 ± 0.05 D | 6.72 ± 6.72 C | 9.54 ± 4.72 D | 1992.70 ± 1222.34 A | 336.26 ± 25.15 C | 63.85 ± 3.80 DE |
| VRM | 7.21 ± 0.07 BC | 0.07 ± 0.01 BC | 2.01 ± 0.17 C | 13.47 ± 0.03 B | 24.52 ± 0.50 C | 2246.69 ± 66.84 A | 406.15 ± 59.01 B | 84.93 ± 6.65 C | |
1 The meaning of each code is the same as Table 1. 2 Mean ± standard deviation; different letters indicate significant differences across treatments as determined by one-way ANOVA analysis (LSD test, p < 0.05, n = 3).
Figure 1Effects of different treatments on the root length, shoot height, and fresh weight of pak choi and lettuce. The meaning of each code is the same as Table 1. Different letters indicate significant differences across treatments as determined by one-way ANOVA analysis (LSD test, p < 0.05, n = 3).
Figure 2Effects of different treatments on the SPAD readings for pak choi and lettuce. The meaning of each code is the same as Table 1. Different letters indicate significant differences across treatments as determined by one-way ANOVA analysis (LSD test, p < 0.05, n = 3).
Figure 3Effects of different treatments on the accumulation of Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn in the roots and shoots of pak choi and lettuce. The meaning of each code is the same as Table 1. Different letters indicate significant differences across treatments, as determined by one-way ANOVA analysis (LSD test, p < 0.05, n = 3). * Not detectable.
The bioconcentration factors (BCFs) and translocation factors (TFs) of Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn for pak choi and lettuce grown in Ti-132 and Ya-400 soil under different treatments.
| Treatment 1 | Bioconcentration Factor (BCF) | Translocation Factor (TF) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Cu | Ni | Zn | Cd | Cu | Ni | Zn | ||
| Ti-132 | |||||||||
| BCC | CK | 0.11 | 0.003 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.51 | 0.02 | 0.64 | 0.82 |
| VRM | 0.05 | 0.002 | 0.28 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 1.23 | |
| BCW | CK | NA 2 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.25 | NA | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.78 |
| VRM | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.88 | 0.25 | 0.89 | |
| LSC | CK | 0.24 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.82 | 0.22 | 0.93 | 0.98 |
| VRM | 0.41 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 1.24 | 0.40 | 0.82 | 0.55 | |
| LSS | CK | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.41 | 0.07 | 1.24 | 0.97 |
| VRM | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.59 | 0.24 | 2.97 | 1.13 | |
| Ya-400 | |||||||||
| BCC | CK | 5.57 | 0.40 | 0.06 | 0.66 | 2.62 | 1.05 | 0.19 | 1.32 |
| VRM | 1.66 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.91 | 1.20 | 0.29 | 1.10 | |
| BCW | CK | 4.70 | 0.26 | 0.10 | 0.53 | 1.78 | NA | 0.87 | NA |
| VRM | 1.01 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 1.28 | |
| LSC | CK | 1.64 | 0.90 | 0.02 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 1.82 |
| VRM | 1.45 | 0.75 | NA | 0.34 | 2.96 | 0.68 | NA | 1.53 | |
| LSS | CK | 6.56 | 0.91 | 0.07 | 0.81 | 2.37 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 3.59 |
| VRM | 2.62 | 0.71 | 0.12 | 0.42 | 2.73 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 1.61 | |
1 The meaning of each code is the same as in Table 1. 2 NA: not available because the concentrations in the roots or shoots were not detectable.
Figure 4Effects of different treatments on the chemical forms of Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn in the blanched shoots of pak choi and lettuce. The meaning of each code is the same as in Table 1.
The hazard quotients (HQv) of Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn for the oral intake of pak choi and lettuce grown under different treatments.
| Treatment 1 | Hazard Quotient (HQv) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Cu | Ni | Zn | ||
| Ti-132 | |||||
| BCC | CK | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.05 | 0.05 |
| VRM | 0.10 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.04 | |
| BCW | CK | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.85 | 0.06 |
| VRM | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.03 | |
| LSC | CK | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.03 |
| VRM | 0.73 | 0.01 | 0.57 | 0.04 | |
| LSS | CK | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.04 |
| VRM | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.04 | |
| Ya-400 | |||||
| BCC | CK | 23.8 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.03 |
| VRM | 10.1 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.03 | |
| BCW | CK | 25.7 | 0.00 | 1.12 | 0.04 |
| VRM | 6.84 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.01 | |
| LSC | CK | 8.67 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.03 |
| VRM | 8.36 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | |
| LSS | CK | 33.3 | 0.01 | 0.78 | 0.06 |
| VRM | 15.6 | 0.01 | 1.45 | 0.03 | |
1 The meaning of each code is the same as in Table 1.