| Literature DB >> 34203543 |
F M Alharbi1, Muhammad Naeem1, Muhammad Zubair2, Muhammad Jawad3, Wajid Ullah Jan2, Rashid Jan3.
Abstract
In this paper, the steady electrically conducting hybrid nanofluid (CuO-Cu/blood) laminar-mixed convection incompressible flow at the stagnation-point with viscous and gyrotactic microorganisms is considered. Additionally, hybrid nanofluid flow over a horizontal porous stretching sheet along with an induced magnetic field and external magnetic field effectsthat can be used in biomedical fields, such as in drug delivery and the flow dynamics of the microcirculatory system. This investigation can also deliver a perfect view about the mass and heat transfer behavior of blood flow in a circulatory system and various hyperthermia treatments such as the treatment of cancer. The simple partial differential equations (PDEs) are converted into a series of dimensional ordinary differential equations (ODEs), which are determined using appropriate similarities variables (HAM). The influence of the suction or injection parameter, mixed convection, Prandtl number, buoyancy ratio parameter, permeability parameter, magnetic parameter, reciprocal magnetic prandtl number, bioconvection Rayleigh number, coupled stress parameter, thermophoretic parameter, Schmidt number, inertial parameter, heat source parameter, and Brownian motion parameter on the concentration, motile microorganisms, velocity, and temperature is outlined, and we study the physical importance of the present problem graphically.Entities:
Keywords: blood; chemical reaction; drug delivery; gyrotactic microorganisms; hemodynamics; hybrid nanofluid; induced magnetic field; nanoparticle mass
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34203543 PMCID: PMC8271748 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26133954
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Two-dimensional problem and coordinate system of the Schematic diagram.
Nanoparticles and primary base fluid have the following thermophysical properties [8].
| Thermophysical Properties | Fluid Phase (Blood) | Copper Oxide (CuO) | Copper (Cu) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3594 | 533 | 385 | |
| 1063 | 6500 | 8933 | |
| 0.492 | 17.65 | 400 | |
| 0.18 | 1.8 | 1.67 | |
| Particles size (nm) | - | 29 | 5–25 |
Adapted frameworks and thermophysical properties for the hybrid nanofluid.
| Property | Hybrid Nanofluid |
|---|---|
| Viscosity ( |
|
| Volumetric heat capacity ( |
|
| Volumetric heat capacity ( |
|
| Thermal conductivity ( | |
Figure 2The effect of on when .
Figure 3The effect of on when .
Figure 4The effect of on when .
Figure 5The effect of on when .
Figure 6The effect of on when .
Figure 7The effect of on when .
Figure 8The effect of on when .
Figure 9The effect of on when .
Figure 10The effect of on when .
Figure 11The effect of on when .
Figure 12The effect of on when .
Figure 13The effect of on when .
Figure 14The effect of on when .
Figure 15The impact of on when .
Figure 16The effect of on when .
Figure 17The effect of on when .
Figure 18The effect of on when .
Figure 19The h-curve graph for .
Figure 20The h-curve graph for .
Figure 21The h-curve graph for .
Figure 22The h-curve graph for .
The effect on the Skin friction with the microorganism of different physical parameters. The impact of various physical parameters over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 |
|
| 0.5 |
| |||||
| 0.7 |
| |||||
| 0.3 |
| |||||
| 0.4 |
| |||||
| 0.6 |
| |||||
| 0.5 |
| |||||
| 1.0 |
| |||||
| 1.5 |
| |||||
| 0.4 |
| |||||
| 0.8 |
| |||||
| 1.0 |
| |||||
| 1.0 |
| |||||
| 2.0 |
| |||||
| 3.0 |
| |||||
| 0.6 |
| |||||
| 1.0 |
| |||||
| 1.5 |
|
The effect on the Nusselt number with the microorganism of different physical parameters.
| α | Pr |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.5 | 8.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
|
| −0.5 |
| |||
| −1.0 |
| |||
| 8.5 |
| |||
| 9.5 |
| |||
| 10.5 |
| |||
| 0.2 |
| |||
| 0.4 |
| |||
| 0.6 |
| |||
| 0.5 |
| |||
| 0.7 |
| |||
| 0.9 |
|
The effect on the Sherwood number with the microorganism of different physical parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.0 |
|
| 0.4 |
| ||
| 0.6 |
| ||
| 0.3 |
| ||
| 0.7 |
| ||
| 0.9 |
| ||
| 1.0 |
| ||
| 1.3 |
| ||
| 1.5 |
|
The effect on the motile with the microorganism of different physical parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
|
| 0.3 |
| ||
| 0.4 |
| ||
| 0.3 |
| ||
| 0.4 |
| ||
| 0.5 |
| ||
| 0.5 |
| ||
| 1.5 |
| ||
| 2.0 |
|
A comparison between ND solves and HAM methods.
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDSolve | HAM | NDSolve | HAM | NDSolve | HAM | NDSolve | HAM | |
| 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|