| Literature DB >> 34203177 |
Mev Dominguez-Valentin1,2,3, John-Paul Plazzer3,4, Julian R Sampson2,5, Christoph Engel2,6, Stefan Aretz7, Mark A Jenkins8, Lone Sunde9,10, Inge Bernstein11,12, Gabriel Capella2,3,13, Francesc Balaguer14, Finlay Macrae3,4, Ingrid M Winship15,16, Huw Thomas17, Dafydd Gareth Evans18, John Burn2,3,19, Marc Greenblatt20, Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel21, Rolf H Sijmons2,3,22, Maartje Nielsen23, Lucio Bertario24, Bernardo Bonanni25, Maria Grazia Tibiletti26, Giulia Martina Cavestro27, Annika Lindblom28, Adriana Della Valle29, Francisco Lopez-Kostner30, Karin Alvarez30, Nathan Gluck31, Lior Katz32, Karl Heinimann33, Carlos A Vaccaro34,35, Sigve Nakken1,36, Eivind Hovig1,37, Kate Green18, Fiona Lalloo18, James Hill38, Hans F A Vasen39, Claudia Perne7, Reinhard Büttner40, Heike Görgens41, Elke Holinski-Feder3,42,43, Monika Morak42,43, Stefanie Holzapfel7, Robert Hüneburg44, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz45,46, Markus Loeffler6, Nils Rahner47, Jürgen Weitz41, Verena Steinke-Lange42,43, Wolff Schmiegel48, Deepak Vangala48, Emma J Crosbie49, Marta Pineda13, Matilde Navarro13, Joan Brunet13, Leticia Moreira14, Ariadna Sánchez14, Miquel Serra-Burriel50, Miriam Mints51, Revital Kariv31, Guy Rosner31, Tamara Alejandra Piñero34,35, Walter Hernán Pavicic34,35, Pablo Kalfayan34, Sanne W Ten Broeke23, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin2,3,52, Kirsi Pylvänäinen53, Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo54,55, Anna Lepistö54,55, Päivi Peltomäki56, John L Hopper8, Aung Ko Win8, Daniel D Buchanan57,58,59, Noralane M Lindor60, Steven Gallinger61, Loïc Le Marchand62, Polly A Newcomb63, Jane C Figueiredo64, Stephen N Thibodeau65, Christina Therkildsen66, Thomas V O Hansen67, Lars Lindberg68, Einar Andreas Rødland1, Florencia Neffa29, Patricia Esperon29, Douglas Tjandra4,16, Gabriela Möslein2,3,69, Toni T Seppälä2,3,55,70, Pål Møller1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome is the most common genetic predisposition for hereditary cancer. Carriers of pathogenic changes in mismatch repair (MMR) genes have an increased risk of developing colorectal (CRC), endometrial, ovarian, urinary tract, prostate, and other cancers, depending on which gene is malfunctioning. In Lynch syndrome, differences in cancer incidence (penetrance) according to the gene involved have led to the stratification of cancer surveillance. By contrast, any differences in penetrance determined by the type of pathogenic variant remain unknown.Entities:
Keywords: Lynch syndrome; MLH1; MSH2; aberrant splicing; cancer incidence; missense; penetrance; truncating
Year: 2021 PMID: 34203177 PMCID: PMC8269121 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132856
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Categorization of the path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 carriers having inherited variants causing truncating or missense/aberrant splicing clinically actionable variants as defined in the InSiGHT database.
| Categorization Group | Variant Type | Gene | Number of Carriers | Sum of the FUP Years | Mean of the FUP Years | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Missense or aberrant splicing | Aberrant Splicing |
| 233 | 1829 | 7.8 | (7.1–8.5) |
| Aberrant Splicing |
| 350 | 2778 | 7.9 | (7.4–8.4) | |
| Missense |
| 345 | 2715 | 7.9 | (7.4–8.4) | |
| Missense |
| 117 | 883 | 7.5 | (6.7–8.3) | |
| Total | 1045 | 8205 | 7.9 | (7.6–8.2) | ||
| Truncating | Canonical Splicing |
| 501 | 4709 | 9.4 | (8.9–9.9) |
| Canonical Splicing |
| 185 | 1635 | 8.8 | (8.0–9.6) | |
| Exon Deletion |
| 688 | 7643 | 11.1 | (10.6–11.6) | |
| Exon Deletion |
| 579 | 4207 | 7.3 | (6.9–7.7) | |
| Nonsense |
| 324 | 2880 | 8.9 | (8.3–9.5) | |
| Nonsense |
| 608 | 4929 | 8.1 | (7.7–8.5) | |
| Frameshift |
| 482 | 3722 | 7.7 | (7.3–8.1) | |
| Frameshift |
| 563 | 4416 | 7.8 | (7.4–8.2) | |
| Total | 3930 | 34,141 | 8.7 | (8.5–8.9) | ||
| Others | Exon Duplication |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | (1.0–1.0) |
| Exon Duplication |
| 16 | 71 | 4.4 | (2.7–6.1) | |
| Inframe Indel |
| 85 | 790 | 9.3 | (8.3–10.3) | |
| Inframe Indel |
| 93 | 811 | 8.7 | (7.7–9.7) | |
| Initiation Codon |
| 8 | 36 | 4.5 | (1.5–7.5) | |
| Intronic |
| 3 | 25 | 8.3 | (2.1–14.5) | |
| Undefined |
| 18 | 249 | 13.8 | (10.7–16.9) | |
| Total | 224 | 1983 |
FUP, follow-up years.
Cumulative cancer incidences stratified by age, gene, variant, and organ.
| Cumulative Incidences (95% CI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||||
| Any cancer | 30 | 0 (0–0) | 2.5 (0.3–4.7) | 3.1 (0–9.1) | 2.2 (0–4.6) |
| 40 | 17.9 (9.3–26.5) | 17.3 (13.1–21.6) | 13.8 (4.1–23.5) | 13.6 (8.9–18.2) | |
| 50 | 36.5 (26.6–46.5) | 39.5 (34.5–44.5) | 36.0 (23.9–48.0) | 35.2 (29.3–41.1) | |
| 60 | 56.6 (44.6–68.4) | 58.6 (53.4–63.9) | 61.6 (49.5–73.6) | 57.8 (51.4–64.1) | |
| 70 | 76.4 (63.6–89.2) | 71.0 (65.1–76.7) | 87.1 (75.6–98.6) | 71.6 (64.4–78.8) | |
| 75 | 83.5 (71.4–95.6) | 75.4 (69.1–81.8) | 87.1 (75.6–98.6) | 80.3 (73.3–87.4) | |
| Colorectal cancer | 30 | 0 (0–0) | 2.5 (0.3–4.6) | 0 (0–0) | 2.1 (0–4.4) |
| 40 | 14.5 (6.5–22.6) | 14.6 (10.6–18.6) | 7.0 (0.3–13.6) | 8.3 (4.5–12.1) | |
| 50 | 23.8 (14.6–33.0) | 28.0 (23.3–32.7) | 15.1 (6.4–23.8) | 18.1 (13.3–22.9) | |
| 60 | 38.4 (26.5–50.4) | 38.9 (33.7–44.0) | 30.6 (19.7–41.5) | 28.9 (23.3–34.5) | |
| 70 | 53.7 (39.0–68.3) | 47.0 (41.2–52.8) | 49.9 (36.4–63.4) | 41.1 (34.2–48.0) | |
| 75 | 61.6 (45.9–77.4) | 50.3 (43.8–56.8) | 49.9 (36.4–63.4) | 47.3 (39.6–55.1) | |
| Endometrial cancer | 30 | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) |
| 40 | 5.2 (0–10.9) | 0.5 (0–1.5) | 2.5 (0–7.2) | 2.4 (0–5.0) | |
| 50 | 11.8 (3.5–20.0) | 15.0 (10.1–19.9) | 13.3 (2.4–24.2) | 19.5 (12.9–26.1) | |
| 60 | 27.0 (13.9–40.1) | 27.7 (21.0–34.3) | 34.5 (17.6–51.3) | 39.2 (30.3–48.1) | |
| 70 | 34.9 (19.2–50.6) | 35.9 (27.6–44.2) | 45.6 (25.6–65.6) | 48.0 (37.4–58.5) | |
| 75 | 34.9 (19.2–50.6) | 38.2 (29.0–47.4) | 45.6 (25.6–65.6) | 50.9 (39.5–62.3) | |
CI, confidence interval.
Figure 1Cumulative incidence of (a) any cancer, (b) colorectal, and (c) endometrial cancer by gene and type of variant. There were no significant differences between carriers with missense/aberrant splicing versus truncating variants at any age in any groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).