| Literature DB >> 34203129 |
Gonzalo Tortella1,2, Olga Rubilar1,2, Paola Fincheira1, Joana C Pieretti3, Paola Duran4, Isabella M Lourenço3, Amedea B Seabra3.
Abstract
Much progress has been achieved in the preparation and application of engineered nanoparticles (NPs) in the field of medicine, mainly for antibacterial and antiviral applications. In the war against bacteria and viruses, besides traditional antibiotics and antiviral drugs, metal-based nanoparticles, such as silver (AgNPs), copper (CuNPs), copper oxides (CuO-NPs), iron oxide (FeO-NPs), zinc oxide (ZnO-NPs), and titanium oxide (TiO2-NPs) have been used as potent antimicrobial agents. These nanoparticles can be synthesized by traditional methods, such as chemical and physical routes, or more recently by biogenic processes. A great variety of macro and microorganisms can be successfully used as reducing agents of metal salt precursors in the biogenic synthesis of metal-based NPs for antimicrobial activity. Depending on the nature of the biological agent, NPs with different sizes, aggregation states, morphology, surface coatings and charges can be obtained, leading to different antimicrobial effects. Considering the drug resistance to traditional therapies, the development of versatile nanomaterials with potent antimicrobial effects is under intensive investigation. In this sense, this review presents and discusses the recent progress in the preparation and application of metal-based nanoparticles biogenically synthesized for antibacterial and antivirus applications. The strength and limitations are critically discussed.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial; antimicrobial nanoparticles; antivirus; biogenic synthesis; metal nanoparticles; nanobiotecnology
Year: 2021 PMID: 34203129 PMCID: PMC8300690 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10070783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Figure 1Main biological sources used to prepare biogenic metal-based NPs.
Figure 2Schematic representation of the damage to bacterial cells caused by metal-based NPs.
Figure 3Main described action mechanisms by which metal-based NPs can act against viruses.
Selected examples of biogenic metal-based NPs with antimicrobial activity synthesized by different biological sources. According to source: 1 = Oomycete, 2 = Cyanobacterium, 3 = Fungi, 4 = Plant, 5 = Algae, 6 = Bacterial, 7 = Microalgae.
| Metal | Biocidal Activity | Biological Source for the Synthesis | Size and Shape | Characterization | Antimicrobial Dose | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag-NP | Bactericidal |
| Size: 6–12 nm | UV–Vis; TEM; XRD | 0.088 mg L−1
| [ |
| Size: 20–35 nm | UV–Vis; XRD; FTIR; TEM; EDXRF | 10 mg L−1 | [ | |||
| Size: 2–20 nm | UV–Vis; FTIR; TEM; EDXRF | 76 mg L−1 | [ | |||
| Size: 90–183 nm | FTIR; TEM; SEM | 10.9–21.4 l μg mL−1 | [ | |||
|
| Size: 13.13–22.69 nm | UV–Vis; SEM; FTIR | 30 mg mL−1 | [ | ||
|
| Size: 26.5 nm | TEM; XRD; SEM; FTIR; AFM | MIC: 50–75 µg mL−1 | [ | ||
| Virucidal | Size: 5–15 nm | UV–Vis; XRD; FTIR;TEM | 0.005 M | [ | ||
|
| Size: | TEM; UV–Vis; FTIR; SEM, AFM, EDX; XRD | IC50: 29.04–31.38 µg mL−1 | [ | ||
| Au-NPs | Bactericidal |
| Size: 16.1 nm | UV–Vis; FTIR; XRD; EDX; SEM; TEM. | 1000 µg mL−1 | [ |
|
| Size: 20 nm | FTIR; XRD; TEM; EDX. | [ | |||
|
| Size: 46.8 nm | SEM; TEM; UV-Vis; XRD; EDX. | 25–100 μg mL−1 | [ | ||
| Virucidal | Size: 6 nm | UV–Vis; DLS; TEM. | EC50: 8.829 µg mL−1 | [ | ||
| Size: 15.60–77.13 nm. | UV–Vis; XRD; TEM; FTIR. | 31.25 μL well−1 | [ | |||
| Cu-NPs | Bactericidal |
| Size: 20 nm | UV–Vis; SEM; XRD; TEM. | 25, 50 and 75 μL | [ |
|
| Size: 34.76 nm | UV–Vis; FTIR; XRD; TEM; EDXRF. | 1 mg mL−1 extract | [ | ||
|
| Size: 5–20 nm | FESEM; SEM; TEM; XRD; EDXRD. | 100–250 μL | [ | ||
|
| Size: 20–25 nm | XRD; TEM; SEM | 0.4–0.4 μg mL−1 | [ | ||
| Virucidal | Size: 2–69 nm | - | - | [ | ||
| ZnO-NPs | Bactericidal |
| Size: 3–68 nm | XRD; FTIR; SEM; UV-Vis; DLS. | 50 µg mL−1 (10 µL) to 1000 µg mL−1 (200 µL) | [ |
|
| Size: 450 × 24 nm, 210 × 120 nm, 20–40 nm | FTIR; GPC; XRD; SEM; TGA; QMS | 250 μg mL−1 | [ | ||
|
| Size: 50.95–54.84 nm | XRD; UV-Vis; TEM; FTIR; EDXRD. | 5000 µg mL−1 | [ | ||
| Orange fruit peel 4 | Size: 10–20 nm | XRD; TGA; TEM. | 0.025 mg mL−1 | [ | ||
|
| Size: 150 nm | UV, FTIR, SEM, XRD, EDX, DLS | 250 µg mL−1 | [ | ||
| Size: 48.2 nm | UV–Vis; XRD; TEM; SEM. | 4–16 µg mL−1 | [ | |||
|
| Size: 50.73 nm | UV–Vis; FTIR; XRD; TEM; SEM; EDX; AFM; DLS. | 1500 µg mL−1 | [ | ||
| Virucidal | - | - | - | - | - | |
| TiO2-NPs | Bactericidal |
| Size: 10–400 nm | UV–Vis; FESEM; SEM; FTIR; XRD; DLS. | 50–100 µg mL−1 | [ |
|
| Size: 10–30 nm | UV–Vis; XRD; SEM; FTIR; AFM; | 10–15 mg mL−1 | [ | ||
|
| Size: 25–191 nm | UV–Vis; FTIR; TEM; EDX. | 80 µg mL−1 | [ | ||
| Virucidal |
| - | - | - | - | |
| FeO-NPs | Bactericidal |
| Size: 11.24–33.71 nm | FTIR; SEM; EDXRD. | 30 mg mL−1 | [ |
| Size: 15–60 nm | UV–Vis; FTIR; XRD; SEM; TEM; DLS. | 100 Μl NPs | [ | |||
|
| Size: 56.2 nm | UV–Vis; FTIR; XRD | 30 μg mL−1 | [ | ||
|
| Size: 34 nm | XRD; UV–Vis; FTIR; SEM; TEM; VSM. | 20–100 μg mL−1 | [ | ||
| Virucidal |
| - | - | - | - |
EDXRF: Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy; TEM: transmission electron microscopy; FTIR: Fourier transform infrared; XRD: X-ray diffraction; UV–Vis: UV–Vis spectroscopy; AFM; Atomic Force Microscopy; SEM: scanning electron microscopy; DLS: Dynamic light scattering; FESEM: Field emission scanning electron microscopy; GPS: gel permeation chromatography; QMS: quadrupole mass spectroscopy; VSM: vibrating-sample magnetometer.