Literature DB >> 34202948

Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit® Workouts with Equalized Volume in Men and Women.

Ronam Toledo1, Marcelo R Dias1,2, Ramon Toledo1, Renato Erotides3, Daniel S Pinto4,5, Victor M Reis5, Jefferson S Novaes6, Jeferson M Vianna1, Katie M Heinrich7.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare the heart rate (HR), blood lactate and training load between different CrossFit® workouts, with equalized total work volumes in men and women. The study included 23 individuals (13 men and 10 women) experienced in CrossFit® training, who performed two workouts with different training types (as many reps as possible (AMRAP) and 'for time') but an equalized volume. Measurements of lactate, HR and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were performed. The results show that there was no HR interaction between workout time and sex (p = 0.822; η2 = 0.006) and between workout type and sex (p = 0.064, η2 = 0.803). The HR significantly differed during each workout type (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.621), but not between the two workout types (p = 0.552, η2 = 0.017). Lactate showed no difference between the workout types (p = 0.474, η2 = 0.768), although the training load was higher (p = 0.033, η2 = 0.199) in women when they performed AMRAP. Altogether, the HR was not significantly different between training types or sex, while RPE, lactate and training load showed statistically significant differences depending on the group (women or men) or workout type (AMRAP or 'for time').

Entities:  

Keywords:  conditioning; high-intensity functional training; methods; performance; physical fitness

Year:  2021        PMID: 34202948     DOI: 10.3390/life11060586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-1729


  2 in total

1.  Time Course of Recovery Following CrossFit® Karen Benchmark Workout in Trained Men.

Authors:  Ivo Vieira de Sousa Neto; Nuno Manuel Frade de Sousa; Frederico Ribeiro Neto; Joao Henrique Falk Neto; Ramires Alsamir Tibana
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in Crossfit® Athletes Using an Optimal Upper-Limb Range of Motion: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Antonio Cejudo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.