Eugenia Irene Davidescu1,2, Irina Odajiu2, Delia Tulbă1,2,3, Iulia Mitrea1,2, Camelia Cucu2, Bogdan Ovidiu Popescu1,2,4. 1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences "Carol Davila", University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 030167 Bucharest, Romania. 2. Department of Neurology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania. 3. Colentina-Research and Development Center, Colentina Clinical Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania. 4. Department of Cell Biology, Neurosciences and Experimental Myology, "Victor Babeș", National Institute of Pathology, 050096 Bucharest, Romania.
Abstract
(1) Background: Emerging evidence indicates that non-motor symptoms significantly influence the quality of life in dystonic patients. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate their psychological characteristics and personality traits. (2) Methods: Subjects with idiopathic dystonia and a matched control group were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Inclusion criteria for patient group included idiopathic dystonia diagnosis, evolution exceeding 1 year, and signed informed consent. Inclusion criteria for the control group included lack of neurological comorbidities and signed informed consent. All subjects completed the DECAS Personality Inventory along with an additional form of demographic factors. Data (including descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate analysis) were analyzed with SPSS. (3) Results: In total, 95 participants were included, of which 57 were in the patient group. Females prevailed (80%), and the mean age was 54.64 ± 12.8 years. The most frequent clinical features of dystonia were focal distribution (71.9%) and progressive disease course (94.73%). The patients underwent regular treatment with botulinum toxin (85.95%). In addition, patients with dystonia obtained significantly higher openness scores than controls, even after adjusting for possible confounders (p = 0.006). Personality traits were also different between the two groups, with patients more often being fantasists (p = 0.007), experimenters (p = 0.022), sophists (p = 0.040), seldom acceptors (p = 0.022), and pragmatics (p = 0.022) than control subjects. (4) Conclusion: Dystonic patients tend to have different personality profiles compared to control subjects, which should be taken into consideration by the treating neurologist.
(1) Background: Emerging evidence indicates that non-motor symptoms significantly influence the quality of life in dystonicpatients. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate their psychological characteristics and personality traits. (2) Methods: Subjects with idiopathic dystonia and a matched control group were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Inclusion criteria for patient group included idiopathic dystonia diagnosis, evolution exceeding 1 year, and signed informed consent. Inclusion criteria for the control group included lack of neurological comorbidities and signed informed consent. All subjects completed the DECAS Personality Inventory along with an additional form of demographic factors. Data (including descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate analysis) were analyzed with SPSS. (3) Results: In total, 95 participants were included, of which 57 were in the patient group. Females prevailed (80%), and the mean age was 54.64 ± 12.8 years. The most frequent clinical features of dystonia were focal distribution (71.9%) and progressive disease course (94.73%). The patients underwent regular treatment with botulinum toxin (85.95%). In addition, patients with dystonia obtained significantly higher openness scores than controls, even after adjusting for possible confounders (p = 0.006). Personality traits were also different between the two groups, with patients more often being fantasists (p = 0.007), experimenters (p = 0.022), sophists (p = 0.040), seldom acceptors (p = 0.022), and pragmatics (p = 0.022) than control subjects. (4) Conclusion:Dystonicpatients tend to have different personality profiles compared to control subjects, which should be taken into consideration by the treating neurologist.
Authors: R Saunders-Pullman; J Shriberg; G Heiman; D Raymond; K Wendt; P Kramer; K Schilling; R Kurlan; C Klein; L J Ozelius; N J Risch; S B Bressman Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-01-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M Smit; A Kuiper; V Han; V C R Jiawan; G Douma; B van Harten; J M T H Oen; M E Pouwels; H J G Dieks; A L Bartels; M A Tijssen Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: Eric S Molho; Mark Stacy; Patrick Gillard; David Charles; Charles H Adler; Joseph Jankovic; Marc Schwartz; Mitchell F Brin Journal: Mov Disord Clin Pract Date: 2015-12-16