Literature DB >> 3420263

Rupture of posterior tibial tendon: CT and MR imaging with surgical correlation.

Z S Rosenberg1, Y Cheung, M H Jahss, A M Noto, A Norman, N E Leeds.   

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were performed in 32 cases of clinically suspected chronic tears of the posterior tibial tendon. Surgery was performed in 22 patients (69%). Each case was classified radiographically and surgically as normal or a type 1, type 2, or type 3 rupture. The sensitivity and specificity of CT were 90% and 100%, respectively, while those of MR imaging were 95% and 100%. The accuracy in detecting ruptures was 91% for CT and 96% for MR imaging. The overall accuracy, which reflected the percentage of cases correctly diagnosed as well as those correctly classified, was 59% for CT and 73% for MR imaging. Although the differences between the CT and MR imaging parameters were not statistically significant (possibly due to the small population), the results suggest that MR imaging is the method of choice for detecting ruptures of the posterior tibial tendon. MR imaging provided greater definition of tendon outline, vertical splits, synovial fluid, edema, and degenerated tissue. CT was superior to MR imaging in showing associated bone abnormalities such as periostitis, subtalar osteoarthritis, and subtalar dislocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3420263     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.169.1.3420263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

1.  The fibrocartilaginous sesamoid: a cause of size and signal variation in the normal distal posterior tibial tendon.

Authors:  E M Delfaut; X Demondion; A Bieganski; H Cotten; H Mestdagh; A Cotten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatology.

Authors:  C W Heron
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  A posterior tibial tendon skipping rope.

Authors:  M N van Sterkenburg; D Haverkamp; C N van Dijk; G M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Magic angle effect in MR imaging of ankle tendons: influence of foot positioning on prevalence and site in asymptomatic subjects and cadaveric tendons.

Authors:  Bernard Mengiardi; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Philip B Schöttle; Beata Bode; Juerg Hodler; Patrick Vienne; Marco Zanetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Tendon and ligament imaging.

Authors:  R J Hodgson; P J O'Connor; A J Grainger
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of ankle tendon pathology: benefits of additional axial short-tau inversion recovery imaging to reduce magic angle effects.

Authors:  Waraporn Srikhum; Lorenzo Nardo; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Gerd Melkus; Theresa Poulos; Lynne S Steinbach; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Surgical treatment of stage II posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction: ten-year clinical and radiographic results.

Authors:  Alberto Ruffilli; Francesco Traina; Sandro Giannini; Roberto Buda; Fabrizio Perna; Cesare Faldini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-07-11

8.  MR imaging findings of painful type II accessory navicular bone: correlation with surgical and pathologic studies.

Authors:  Yun Sun Choi; Kyung Tai Lee; Heung Sik Kang; Eun Kyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Focal partial tears of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon at the entrance to the bicipital groove: MR imaging findings, surgical correlation, and clinical significance.

Authors:  Cree M Gaskin; Mark W Anderson; Asim Choudhri; David R Diduch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of tendon and ligament abnormalities: Part II. Pelvis and lower extremities.

Authors:  J Tehranzadeh; R Kerr; J Amster
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.