| Literature DB >> 34202115 |
Natalia Czaplicka1, Szymon Mania2, Donata Konopacka-Łyskawa1.
Abstract
The literature indicates the existence of a relationship between rhamnolipids and bacterial biofilm, as well as the ability of selected bacteria to produce rhamnolipids and alginate. However, the influence of biosurfactant molecules on the mechanical properties of biofilms are still not fully understood. The aim of this research is to determine the effect of rhamnolipids concentration, CaCl2 concentration, and ionic cross-linking time on the mechanical properties of alginate hydrogels using a Box-Behnken design. The mechanical properties of cross-linked alginate hydrogels were characterized using a universal testing machine. It was assumed that the addition of rhamnolipids mainly affects the compression load, and the value of this parameter is lower for hydrogels produced with biosurfactant concentration below CMC than for hydrogels obtained in pure water. In contrast, the addition of rhamnolipids in an amount exceeding CMC causes an increase in compression load. In bacterial biofilms, the presence of rhamnolipid molecules does not exceed the CMC value, which may confirm the influence of this biosurfactant on the formation of the biofilm structure. Moreover, rhamnolipids interact with the hydrophobic part of the alginate copolymer chains, and then the hydrophilic groups of adsorbed biosurfactant molecules create additional calcium ion trapping sites.Entities:
Keywords: alginate hydrogel; biofilm; ionic cross-linking; mechanical properties; rhamnolipids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34202115 PMCID: PMC8269414 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22136840
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Range and levels of parameters in Box-Behnken experimental design.
| Factors | Parameters | Coded Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | ||
|
| CaCl2 concentration [mol/dm3] | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.25 |
|
| Rhamnolipids concentration [log c] | 3.64 | 4.64 | 5.64 |
|
| Ion cross-linking time [h] | 12 | 24 | 36 |
Box-Behnken matrix.
| Run |
|
|
| CaCl2 Concentration [mol/dm3] | Rhamnolipids Concentration [log c] | Ion Cross-Linking Time [h] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 0.05 | 3.64 | 24 |
| 2 | +1 | −1 | 0 | 0.25 | 3.64 | 24 |
| 3 | −1 | +1 | 0 | 0.05 | 5.64 | 24 |
| 4 | +1 | +1 | 0 | 0.25 | 5.64 | 24 |
| 5 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 0.05 | 4.64 | 12 |
| 6 | +1 | 0 | −1 | 0.25 | 4.64 | 12 |
| 7 | −1 | 0 | +1 | 0.05 | 4.64 | 36 |
| 8 | +1 | 0 | +1 | 0.25 | 4.64 | 36 |
| 9 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 0.15 | 3.64 | 12 |
| 10 | 0 | +1 | −1 | 0.15 | 5.64 | 12 |
| 11 | 0 | −1 | +1 | 0.15 | 3.64 | 36 |
| 12 | 0 | +1 | +1 | 0.15 | 5.64 | 36 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | 4.64 | 24 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | 4.64 | 24 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | 4.64 | 24 |
Figure 1Surface tension function versus the decimal logarithm of the rhamnolipids concentration at room temperature in water.
Mechanical properties of the hydrogels prepared according to the Box-Behnken plan (samples 1–15), and hydrogels without rhamnolipids (control samples C1–C9).
| Run | CaCl2 Concentration [mol/dm3] | Rhamnolipids Concentration [log c] | Ion Cross-linking Time [h] | Compression Load [kPa] | Flexibility [−] | Cohesiveness [−] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.05 | 3.64 | 24 | 5.74 ± 0.06 | 0.861 ± 0.009 | 0.301 ± 0.007 |
| 2 | 0.25 | 3.64 | 24 | 35.18 ± 0.66 | 0.673 ± 0.006 | 0.613 ± 0.010 |
| 3 | 0.05 | 5.64 | 24 | 9.60 ± 0.59 | 0.707 ± 0.005 | 0.311 ± 0.009 |
| 4 | 0.25 | 5.64 | 24 | 83.04 ± 3.93 | 0.688 ± 0.004 | 0.477 ± 0.012 |
| 5 | 0.05 | 4.64 | 12 | 6.38 ± 0.48 | - | 0.294 ± 0.008 |
| 6 | 0.25 | 4.64 | 12 | 89.41 ± 2.48 | 0.662 ± 0.010 | 0.552 ± 0.005 |
| 7 | 0.05 | 4.64 | 36 | 38.25 ± 2.65 | 0.763 ± 0.009 | 0.425 ± 0.011 |
| 8 | 0.25 | 4.64 | 36 | 95.24 ± 0.38 | 0.728 ± 0.011 | 0.604 ± 0.013 |
| 9 | 0.15 | 3.64 | 12 | 43.50 ± 1.97 | 0.695 ± 0.005 | 0.463 ± 0.015 |
| 10 | 0.15 | 5.64 | 12 | 55.32 ± 2.04 | 0.773 ± 0.014 | 0.591 ± 0.006 |
| 11 | 0.15 | 3.64 | 36 | 52.65 ± 1.56 | 0.703 ± 0.008 | 0.598 ± 0.005 |
| 12 | 0.15 | 5.64 | 36 | 67.45 ± 2.52 | 0.669 ± 0.007 | 0.590 ± 0.010 |
| 13 | 0.15 | 4.64 | 24 | 27.85 | 0.648 | 0.465 |
| 14 | 0.15 | 4.64 | 24 | 26.56 | 0.638 | 0.477 |
| 15 | 0.15 | 4.64 | 24 | 29.14 | 0.658 | 0.453 |
| C1 | 0.05 | - | 12 | 7.50 ± 0.33 | - | 0.349 ± 0.005 |
| C2 | 0.05 | - | 24 | 22.76 ± 1.01 | 0.907 ± 0.005 | 0.312 ± 0.004 |
| C3 | 0.05 | - | 36 | 38.13 ± 1.15 | 0.709 ± 0.007 | 0.406 ± 0.005 |
| C4 | 0.15 | - | 12 | 66.94 ± 3.47 | 0.744 ± 0.008 | 0.509 ± 0.008 |
| C5 | 0.15 | - | 24 | 68.88 ± 2.43 | 0.688 ± 0.010 | 0.535 ± 0.010 |
| C6 | 0.15 | - | 36 | 71.20 ± 4.02 | 0.751 ± 0.004 | 0.479 ± 0.007 |
| C7 | 0.25 | - | 12 | 82.48 ± 4.87 | 0.673 ± 0.004 | 0.587 ± 0.011 |
| C8 | 0.25 | - | 24 | 91.72 ± 1.40 | 0.738 ± 0.012 | 0.585 ± 0.009 |
| C9 | 0.25 | - | 36 | 93.14 ± 3.60 | 0.824 ± 0.006 | 0.558 ± 0.013 |
Figure 2Surface plots presenting the effect of selected independent variables on the compression load of hydrogels.
Figure 3Surface plots presenting the effect of selected independent variables on the flexibility of hydrogels.
Figure 4Surface plots presenting the effect of selected independent variables on the cohesiveness of hydrogels.