Literature DB >> 34201671

Uptake Dynamics of Ionic and Elemental Selenium Forms and Their Metabolism in Multiple-Harvested Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.).

Zoltán Kovács1, Áron Soós2, Béla Kovács2, László Kaszás1, Nevien Elhawat1,3, Nóra Bákonyi1, Mutasem Razem2, Miklós G Fári1, József Prokisch4, Éva Domokos-Szabolcsy1, Tarek Alshaal1,5.   

Abstract

A pot experiment, under greenhouse conditions, was carried out aiming at investigating the agronomic biofortification of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) with Se and monitoring the Se uptake and accumulation dynamics within four consecutive harvests within the same growing season. Two ionic Se forms, i.e., sodium selenate (Se (VI)) and sodium selenite (Se (IV)), were applied once at a rate of 1, 10, and 50 mg kg-1 (added on Se basis), while 10 and 50 mg L-1 of a red elemental Se (red Se0) were used; all Se treatments were added as soil application. Application of Se (VI) at the rate of 50 mg kg-1 was toxic to alfalfa plants. The effect of Se forms on Se accumulation in alfalfa tissues, regardless of the applied Se concentration, follows: Se (VI) > Se (IV) > red Se0. The leaf, in general, possessed higher total Se content than the stem in all the treatments. The accumulation of Se in stem and leaf tissues showed a gradual decline between the harvests, especially for plants treated with either Se (VI) or Se (IV); however, the chemically synthesized red Se0 showed different results. The treatment of 10 mg kg-1 Se (VI) resulted in the highest total Se content in stem (202.5 and 98.0 µg g-1) and leaf (643.4 and 284.5 µg g-1) in the 1st and 2nd harvests, respectively. Similar tendency is reported for the Se (IV)-treated plants. Otherwise, the application of red Se0 resulted in a lower Se uptake; however, less fluctuation in total Se content between the four harvests was noticed compared to the ionic Se forms. The Se forms in stem and leaf of alfalfa extracted by water and subsequently by protease XIV enzyme were measured by strong anion exchange (SAX) HPLC-ICP-MS. The major Se forms in our samples were selenomethionine (SeMet) and Se (VI), while neither selenocysteine (SeCys) nor Se (IV) was detected. In water extract, however, Se (VI) was the major Se form, while SeMet was the predominant form in the enzyme extract. Yet, Se (VI) and SeMet contents declined within the harvests, except in stem of plants treated with 50 mg L-1 red Se0. The highest stem or leaf SeMet yield %, in all harvests, corresponded to the treatment of 50 mg L-1 red Se0. For instance, 63.6% (in stem) and 38.0% (in leaf) were calculated for SeMet yield % in the 4th harvest of plants treated with 50 mg L-1 red Se0. Our results provide information about uptake and accumulation dynamics of different ionic Se forms in case of multiple-harvested alfalfa, which, besides being a good model plant, is an important target plant species in green biorefining.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agronomic biofortification; alfalfa; red elemental Se; selenomethionine; uptake dynamics

Year:  2021        PMID: 34201671     DOI: 10.3390/plants10071277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plants (Basel)        ISSN: 2223-7747


  23 in total

Review 1.  Do toxic ions induce hormesis in plants?

Authors:  Charlotte Poschenrieder; Catalina Cabot; Soledad Martos; Berta Gallego; Juan Barceló
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.729

2.  On the mechanism of selenium tolerance in selenium-accumulating plants. Purification and characterization of a specific selenocysteine methyltransferase from cultured cells of Astragalus bisculatus.

Authors:  B Neuhierl; A Böck
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1996-07-01

Review 3.  A critical review of selenium biogeochemical behavior in soil-plant system with an inference to human health.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahid; Nabeel Khan Niazi; Sana Khalid; Behzad Murtaza; Irshad Bibi; Muhammad Imtiaz Rashid
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 4.  Selenium accumulation by plants.

Authors:  Philip J White
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Selenium delays tomato fruit ripening by inhibiting ethylene biosynthesis and enhancing the antioxidant defense system.

Authors:  Zhu Zhu; Yanli Chen; Guoqing Shi; Xueji Zhang
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 7.514

6.  Selenoamino Acid-Enriched Green Pea as a Value-Added Plant Protein Source for Humans and Livestock.

Authors:  Farzaneh Garousi; Éva Domokos-Szabolcsy; Mihály Jánószky; Andrea Balláné Kovács; Szilvia Veres; Áron Soós; Béla Kovács
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 7.  Environmental Selenium and Human Health: an Update.

Authors:  Marco Vinceti; Tommaso Filippini; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2018-12

8.  SELENIUM IN HIGHER PLANTS.

Authors:  N. Terry; A. M. Zayed; M. P. De Souza; A. S. Tarun
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06

Review 9.  Selenium in food and the human body: a review.

Authors:  Miguel Navarro-Alarcon; Carmen Cabrera-Vique
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Effects of selenate and red Se-nanoparticles on the photosynthetic apparatus of Nicotiana tabacum.

Authors:  Ottó Zsiros; Valéria Nagy; Árpád Párducz; Gergely Nagy; Renáta Ünnep; Hassan El-Ramady; József Prokisch; Zsuzsa Lisztes-Szabó; Miklós Fári; József Csajbók; Szilvia Zita Tóth; Győző Garab; Éva Domokos-Szabolcsy
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.