| Literature DB >> 34200649 |
Erika N Vega1, Adriana K Molina1, Carla Pereira1, Maria Inês Dias1, Sandrina A Heleno1, Paula Rodrigues1, Isabel P Fernandes1, Maria Filomena Barreiro1,2, Dejan Stojković3, Marina Soković3, Márcio Carocho1, João C M Barreira1, Isabel C F R Ferreira1, Lillian Barros1.
Abstract
Given the importance of colour in the general acceptance or rejection of a product, the use of colorants is a widespread practice, particularly in the food industry. At the same time, with the increasing consumers' awareness of the health effects that some artificial colorants can exert, there is a growing tendency to prioritize foodstuffs containing natural additives. In this work, Morus nigra L. and Rubus fruticosus L. fruit juices were characterized in terms of anthocyanins, organic acids, free sugars, and tocopherols, as also regarding their bioactive properties. Given their richness in anthocyanins, this study also aimed to prepare different solid colouring formulations by the spray-drying technique, using as stabilizers maltodextrin and arabic gum. Six free sugars and two organic acids were detected in the fruit juices, as well as the four tocopherol isoforms. Two cyanidin derivatives were found in M. nigra (cyanidin-3-O-glucoside and cyanidin-O-rhamnoside) and other four in R. fruticosus (cyanidin-O-hexoside, cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, cyanidin-O-pentoside, and cyanidin-3-O-dioxaloilglucoside). The developed colouring formulations revealed a good stability over time, in terms of anthocyanin concentration and colour parameters, and revealed to be safe for consumption, either concerning their low microbial load and lack of cytotoxicity. Thus, they represent a promising natural alternative to the massively used artificial colorants.Entities:
Keywords: Morus nigra L.; Rubus fruticosus L.; anthocyanins; stable food colorants
Year: 2021 PMID: 34200649 PMCID: PMC8230347 DOI: 10.3390/plants10061181
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Free sugars, organic acids, and tocopherols composition of M. nigra and R. fruticosus fruit extracts.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Sugars (mg/g extract) | |||
| Fructose | 248 ± 2 | 201 ± 1 | <0.001 |
| Glucose | 229.9 ± 0.3 | 163.5 ± 0.1 | <0.001 |
| Sucrose | 2.70 ± 0.08 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | <0.001 |
| Trehalose | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | <0.001 |
| Raffinose | 5.1 ± 0.2 | 12.1 ± 0.6 | <0.001 |
| Unknown | nd | 21 ± 1 | - |
| Total | 449 ± 2 | 373 ± 1 | <0.001 |
| Organic acids (mg/g extract) | |||
| Oxalic acid | 14.91 ± 0.09 | 5.52 ± 0.02 | <0.001 |
| Malic acid | 146.9 ± 0.6 | 101.9 ± 0.2 | <0.001 |
| Total | 161.8 ± 0.6 | 107.3 ± 0.2 | <0.001 |
| Tocopherols (mg/g extract) | |||
| α-Tocopherol | 43 ± 2 | 6.1 ± 0.1 | <0.001 |
| β-Tocopherol | 1.27 ± 0.03 | nd | - |
| γ-Tocopherol | 12.5 ± 0.2 | nd | - |
| δ-Tocopherol | 5.5 ± 0.1 | nd | - |
| Total | 62 ± 2 | 6.1 ± 0.1 | <0.001 |
nd: not detected; p-values obtained by applying the Student’s t-test at a 5% significance level.
Anthocyanin composition of M. nigra and R. fruticosus fruit extracts.
| Peak | Rt (min) | λmax (nm) | [M]+ | MS2 | Tentative Identification | Concentration (mg/g Extract) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 1 | 19.72 | 515 | 449 | 287(100) | Cyanidin-3- | 6.096 ± 0.003 |
| 2 | 22.00 | 517 | 595 | 449(31), 287(100) | Cyanidin- | 2.443 ± 0.002 |
| Total | 8.538 ± 0.005 | |||||
|
| ||||||
| 1′ | 16.69 | 518 | 449 | 287(100) | Cyanidin- | 3.761 ± 0.007 |
| 2′ | 19.55 | 518 | 449 | 287(100) | Cyanidin-3- | 1.81 ± 0.01 |
| 3′ | 24.01 | 517 | 419 | 287(100) | Cyanidin- | 1.265 ± 0.001 |
| 4′ | 30.14 | 519 | 593 | 287(100) | Cyanidin-3- | 1.198 ± 0.001 |
| Total | 8.03 ± 0.02 | |||||
Calibration curve used for quantification: cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (y = 134,578x – 3 × 106; R: 0.9986; LOD: 0.25 µg/mL; LOQ: 0.83 µg/mL).
Figure 1Chromatographic profile of the anthocyanin compounds found in M. nigra (a) and R. fruticosus (b) fruit juices, recorded at 520 nm (1: cyanidin-3-O-glucoside; 2: cyanidin-O-rhamnoside-O-hexoside; 1′: cyanidin-O-hexoside; 2′: cyanidin-3-O-glucoside; 3′: cyanidin-O-pentoside; 4′: cyanidin-3-O-dioxaloilglucoside).
Bioactive properties of M. nigra fruit extract and colouring formulations.
| Antioxidant Activity (IC50 Values, µg/mL) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trolox 1 | |||||||
| TBARS assay | 39 ± 2a | 55.6 ± 0.4c | 51 ± 1b | 52 ± 2b | 139 ± 5 | ||
| OxHLIA assay | 60 min | 253 ± 10d | 166 ± 5c | 124 ± 5b | 108 ± 5a | 85 ± 2 | |
| 120 min | 569 ± 14d | 324 ± 17c | 286 ± 10a | 296 ± 11a | 183 ± 4 | ||
|
| |||||||
| Streptomycin 1 | Ampicilin 1 | ||||||
|
| MIC/MBC | 5.01/10.02 | 6.81/6.81 | 8.52/8.52 | 8.52/8.52 | 0.10/0.20 | 0.25/0.40 |
|
| MIC/MBC | 20.04/20.04 | 3.41/6.81 | 4.26/8.52 | 4.26/8.52 | 0.17/0.25 | 0.34/0.37 |
|
| MIC/MBC | 10.02/20.04 | 3.41/3.41 | 4.26/4.26 | 4.26/4.26 | 0.20/0.30 | 0.40/0.50 |
|
| MIC/MBC | 2.50/5.01 | 3.41/3.41 | 4.26/8.52 | 4.26/8.52 | 0.20/0.30 | 0.40/0.50 |
|
| MIC/MBC | 10.02/20.04 | 1.7/1.7 | 2.13/2.13 | 4.26/4.26 | 0.043/0.25 | 0.086/0.37 |
| MIC/MBC | 10.02/20.04 | 1.7/3.41 | 2.13/4.26 | 4.26/4.26 | 0.20/0.30 | 0.75/1.20 | |
|
| |||||||
| Ketoconazole 1 | Bifonazole 1 | ||||||
|
| MIC/MFC | 5.01/10.02 | 13.63/27.27 | 17.05/17.05 | 8.52/17.05 | 0.38/0.95 | 0.48/0.64 |
|
| MIC/MFC | 2.51/5.01 | 6.81/27.27 | 4.26/8.52 | 4.26/8.52 | 0.20/0.50 | 0.10/0.20 |
|
| MIC/MFC | 20.04/>20.04 | 27.27/>27.27 | 34.09/>34.09 | 17.05/34.09 | 0.20/0.50 | 0.15/0.20 |
|
| MIC/MFC | 2.51/5.01 | 13.63/27.27 | 17.05/34.09 | 8.52/34.09 | 0.20/0.50 | 0.20/0.25 |
|
| MIC/MFC | 2.51/5.01 | 27.27/>27.27 | 34.09/>34.09 | 34.09/>34.09 | 1.00/1.50 | 0.20/0.25 |
|
| MIC/MFC | 1.25/2.51 | 2.13/13.63 | 2.13/4.26 | 4.26/8.52 | 1.00/1.00 | 0.15/0.20 |
1 Positive controls; M. nigra control: colouring formulation control; M. nigra + M: colouring formulation containing maltodextrin (40%); M. nigra + M + AG: colouring formulation containing maltodextrin (20%) and arabic gum (20%). IC50: extract concentration providing 50% of antioxidant activity; MIC: minimum inhibitory properties; MBC: minimum bactericidal concentration; MFC: minimum fungicidal properties. For the antioxidant activity, different letters in each line mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Bioactive properties of R. fruticosus fruit extract and colouring formulations.
| Antioxidant Activity (IC50 Values, µg/mL) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trolox 1 | |||||||
| TBARS assay | 100 ± 2c | 78.4 ± 0.8a | 101 ± 2c | 94.9 ± 0.2b | 139 ± 5b | ||
| OxHLIA assay | 60 min | 120 ± 7c | 81 ± 3a | 108 ± 5b | 106 ± 5b | 85 ± 2a | |
| 120 min | 215 ± 3b | 194 ± 6a | 250 ± 4c | 248 ± 5c | 183 ± 4a | ||
|
| |||||||
| Streptomycin 1 | Ampicilin 1 | ||||||
|
| MIC/MBC | 5.03/10.06 | 2.53/5.06 | 2.51/5.02 | 5.03/10.06 | 0.10/0.20 | 0.25/0.40 |
|
| MIC/MBC | 13.41/20.12 | 5.06/13.49 | 20.08/20.08 | 10.06/20.12 | 0.17/0.25 | 0.34/0.37 |
|
| MIC/MBC | 10.06/20.12 | 5.06/10.12 | 10.04/20.08 | 10.06/26.83 | 0.20/0.30 | 0.40/0.50 |
|
| MIC/MBC | 2.51/2.51 | 1.27/2.53 | 2.51/5.02 | 1.26/2.52 | 0.20/0.30 | 0.40/0.50 |
|
| MIC/MBC | 13.41/20.12 | 5.06/10.12 | 10.04/20.08 | 5.03/10.06 | 0.043/0.25 | 0.086/0.37 |
|
| MIC/MBC | 13.41/20.12 | 5.06/10.12 | 10.04/20.08 | 5.03/10.06 | 0.20/0.30 | 0.75/1.20 |
|
| |||||||
| Ketoconazole 1 | Bifonazole 1 | ||||||
|
| MIC/MFC | 5.03/10.06 | 2.53/5.06 | 2.51/5.02 | 5.03/10.06 | 0.38/0.95 | 0.48/0.64 |
|
| MIC/MFC | 20.12/>20.12 | 1.27/2.53 | 1.26/2.52 | 1.26/2.52 | 0.20/0.50 | 0.10/0.20 |
|
| MIC/MFC | 20.12/>20.12 | 5.06/10.12 | 3.77/5.02 | 5.03/10.06 | 0.20/0.50 | 0.15/0.20 |
|
| MIC/MFC | 2.52/5.03 | 1.27/2.53 | 2.51/5.02 | 2.52/5.03 | 0.20/0.50 | 0.20/0.25 |
|
| MIC/MFC | 2.52/5.03 | 5.06/10.12 | 2.51/5.02 | 5.03/10.06 | 1.00/1.50 | 0.20/0.25 |
|
| MIC/MFC | 1.26/2.52 | 0.91/1.27 | 2.51/5.02 | 1.26/2.52 | 1.00/1.00 | 0.15/0.20 |
1 Positive controls; R. fruticosus control: colouring formulation control; R. fruticosus + M: colouring formulation containing maltodextrin (40%); R. fruticosus + M + AG: colouring formulation containing maltodextrin (20%) and arabic gum (20%). IC50: extract concentration providing 50% of antioxidant activity; MIC: minimum inhibitory properties; MBC: minimum bactericidal concentration; MFC: minimum fungicidal properties. For the antioxidant activity, different letters in each line mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Evolution of anthocyanin concentration (mg/g) of the colouring formulations from M. nigra (a) and R. fruticosus (b). w: weeks, Room T: room temperature.
Figure 3Evolution of colour parameters, L*, a*, and b* (CIE L*a*b* units) of the colouring formulations from M. nigra (a) and R. fruticosus (b). w: weeks, Room T: room temperature. In any case, no substantial differences were observed in any of the parameters analysed, either as a function of storage time (up to 12 weeks), or the temperature at which the samples were stored (23 °C or 3 °C).
Microbial counts of the analysed samples inoculated with approximately 109 cells/mL of each tested microorganism and submitted to pasteurization (n = 3).
| Initial Counts (before Pasteurization) | Counts after Pasteurization at 80 °C | Counts after Pasteurization at 90 °C | log10 Cycle Reduction in Contaminated Samples without Pasteurization | log10 Cycle Reduction after Pasteurization at 80 °C | log10 Cycle Reduction after Pasteurization at 90 °C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5.36 ± 0.02 | nd | nd | 3.57 | 8.93 | 8.93 |
|
| 3.46 ± 0.06 | nd | nd | 3.75 | 7.21 | 7.21 |
|
| 4.44 ± 0.05b | 2.82 ± 0.05a | nd | 4.33 | 5.96 | 8.77 |
|
| 3.59 ± 0.03b | 2.31 ± 0.08a | nd | 4.02 | 5.26 | 7.61 |
nd—not detected; different letters in each line mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Microbial analysis (log10 CFU/g) of the colouring formulations of R. fruticosus stored at room and refrigerated temperature for 12 weeks.
| Aerobic Mesophilic | Coliforms | Yeasts | Moulds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Room temperature | |||||
| Storage time (ST) | 0 weeks | 1 ± 2 | nd | 1 ± 2 | 3.14 ± 0.19 |
| 12 weeks | 1 ± 2 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Student’s | 0.407 | - | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Formulation (F) | Control | 3.5 ± 0.1 | nd | 2 ± 2 | 2 ± 2 |
| M | nd | nd | nd | 1 ± 2 | |
| M + AG | nd | nd | nd | 2 ± 2 | |
| Tukey’s HSD test | <0.001 | - | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| ST×F ( | 0.498 | - | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Refrigerated temperature | |||||
| Storage time (ST) | 0 weeks | 1 ± 2 | nd | 1 ± 1 | 3.1 ± 0.2 |
| 12 weeks | 3.4 ± 0.7 | nd | 1 ± 1 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | |
| Student’s T test | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Formulation (F) | Control | 3.8 ± 0.2 | nd | 2 ± 2 | 3.2 ± 0.2 |
| M | 2 ± 2 | nd | nd | 2.89 ± 0.08 | |
| M + AG | 1 ± 1 | nd | 1 ± 2 | 3.15 ± 0.06 | |
| Tukey’s HSD test | <0.001 | - | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| ST × F ( | <0.001 | - | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
nd—not detected. In each row, for storage time, represents a statistically significant difference between the two time-points of analysis, while for the formulation, different letters mean a statistically significant difference, with a significance of 0.05. The standard deviations presented were calculated using the results obtained in different conditions, and as such, they should not be considered as precision measures, but as a range of values.
Microbial analysis (log10 CFU/g) of the colouring formulations of M. nigra stored at room and refrigerated temperature for 12 weeks.
| Aerobic Mesophilic | Coliforms | Yeasts | Moulds | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Room temperature | |||||
| Storage time (ST) | 0 weeks | 2 ± 2 | nd | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 |
| 12 weeks | 3.0 ± 0.4 | nd | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 | |
| Student’s T test | <0.001 | - | <0.001 | 0.032 | |
| Formulation (F) | Control | 3.7 ± 0.5 | nd | 3.12 ± 0.06 | 2.9 ± 0.1 |
| M | 2.5 ± 0.1 | nd | 3.0 ± 0.3 | nd | |
| M + AG | 2 ± 2 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Tukey’s HSD test | <0.001 | - | <0.001 | - | |
| ST × F ( | <0.001 | - | <0.001 | 0.016 | |
| Refrigerated temperature | |||||
| Storage time (ST) | 0 weeks | 2 ± 2 | nd | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 |
| 12 weeks | 3.32 ± 0.08 | nd | 2 ± 1 | 2 ± 2 | |
| Student’s T test | 0.028 | - | 0.114 | 0.942 | |
| Formulation (F) | Control | 3.8 ± 0.4 | nd | 3.05 ± 0.09 | 2.9 ± 0.2a |
| M | 2.8 ± 0.5 | nd | 3.0 ± 0.3 | 2 ± 2b | |
| M + AG | 2 ± 2 | nd | nd | nd | |
| Tukey’s HSD test | <0.001 | - | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| ST × F ( | <0.001 | - | <0.001 | 0.855 | |
nd—not detected. In each row, for storage time, represents a statistically significant difference between the two time-points of analysis, while for the formulation, different letters mean a statistically significant difference, with a significance of 0.05. The standard deviations presented were calculated using the results obtained in different conditions, and as such, they should not be considered as precision measures, but as a range of values.
Figure 4Estimated marginal mean plot of the aerobic mesophilic microorganisms for M. nigra at room temperature.
Figure 5Overview of the analyses performed with the fruits juice and colouring formulations.