| Literature DB >> 34200577 |
Beatriz Villar1, Laia Bertran2, Carmen Aguilar2, Jessica Binetti1, Salomé Martínez3, Fàtima Sabench4, Monica Real1, David Riesco1, Marta París4, Daniel Del Castillo4, Cristóbal Richart2, Teresa Auguet1,2.
Abstract
Recent studies suggest a link between pro-neurotensin (pro-NT) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but the published data are conflicting. Thus, we aimed to analyze pro-NT levels in women with morbid obesity (MO) and NAFLD to investigate if this molecule is involved in NAFLD and liver lipid metabolism. Plasma levels of pro-NT were determined in 56 subjects with MO and 18 with normal weight (NW). All patients with MO were subclassified according to their liver histology into the normal liver (NL, n = 20) and NAFLD (n = 36) groups. The NAFLD group had 17 subjects with simple steatosis (SS) and 19 with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We used a chemiluminescence sandwich immunoassay to quantify pro-NT in plasma and RT-qPCR to evaluate the hepatic mRNA levels of several lipid metabolism-related genes. We reported that pro-NT levels were significantly higher in MO with NAFLD than in MO without NAFLD. Additionally, pro-NT levels were higher in NASH patients than in NL. The hepatic expression of lipid metabolism-related genes was found to be altered in NAFLD, as previously reported. Additionally, although pro-NT levels correlated with LDL, there was no association with the main lipid metabolism-related genes. These findings suggest that pro-NT could be related to NAFLD progression.Entities:
Keywords: lipid metabolism; neurotensin; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; pro-neurotensin
Year: 2021 PMID: 34200577 PMCID: PMC8226510 DOI: 10.3390/metabo11060373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Anthropometric and biochemical variables of the study classified according to the BMI and the hepatic histopathological classification.
| Variables | NW | MO ( | NAFLD ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NL ( | NAFLD ( | SS ( | NASH ( | ||
| Age (years) | 43.50 ± 6.73 | 44.54 ± 10.02 | 48 ± 9.79 | 46.19 ± 10.78 | 49.63 ± 8.78 |
| Weight (kg) | 54.2 (51–65.43) a | 115.5 (41.54–50.79) | 119.5 (109–129.75) | 120 (109.80–134) | 119 (107–123) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.97 (20.79–24.08) a | 46.41 (41.53–50.79) | 46.5 (44.03–51.69) | 46.87 (43.03–56.09) | 46.2 (44.26–48.59) |
| WC (cm) | 71.5 (68.5–82.5) a | 125.25 (115–144) | 130 (124–136.5) | 133 (124–137) | 129 (122.75–133) |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 90 (84.5–98.50) a | 83 (76–95) | 116 (103–152) b | 115.5 (101.50–139.25) c | 116 (103–152) d |
| Insulin (mUI/L) | 7.8 (4.90–10.06) a | 11 (7.31–14.03) | 16.31 (10.69–24.26) b | 17.6 (10.60–25.4) | 15.24 (10.78–22.50) d |
| HOMA2-IR | 1.05 (0.60–1.30) a | 1.15 (0.90–1.65) | 2.3 (1.45–3.4) b | 2.65 (1.30–3.45) | 2 (1.50–3.20) d |
| HbA1c (%) | 5 (4.6–5.3) a | 5 (4.6–5.3) | 5.5 (5–6.5) b | 5.8 (5–6.2) c | 5.1 (4.9–6.6) |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 197.59 ± 30.21 a | 166.60 ± 29.64 | 181.14 ± 34.12 | 177.25 ± 36.29 | 184.42 ± 32.81 |
| HDLc (mg/dL) | 64 (49.75–73) a | 48 (40–57) | 38.10 (35.75–43.25) b | 36.5(29–41.05) c | 41 (36.75–44) d |
| LDLc (mg/dL) | 114.46 ± 28.85 | 89.61 ± 25.27 | 107.01 ± 29.12 b | 105.49 ± 30.69 | 108.53 ± 28.38 d |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 85 (52.5–169.25) a | 124 (75–167) | 162 (122.50–239) b | 168 (109.37- 243.75) | 160 (124–239) |
| AST (UI/L) | 19.5 (15.25–22.50) a | 21 (18.25–26.25) | 32 (24.75–54) b | 31.5 (25.25–54) c | 36.5 (20.50–52.50) d |
| ALT (UI/L) | 15 (11.50–20.50) a | 18.5 (16–27.25) | 35 (27–53) b | 33 (27.50–51.25) c | 37 (24–62) d |
| GGT (UI/L) | 11 (9–21) a | 17 (10.50–26) | 27.5 (15.75–43) b | 30 (16–41) | 25 (15–66) |
| ALP (Ul/L) | 55.71 ± 14.67 a | 60.33 ± 11.49 | 70.80 ± 15.71 b | 68.87± 15.58 c | 72.51 ± 16.07 d |
1 NW, normal weight; MO, morbid obesity; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NL, normal liver; SS, simple steatosis; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; HOMA2-IR, homeostatic model assessment method 2 of insulin resistance; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDLc, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLc, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range), depending on the distribution of the variables. a Significant differences between NW subjects and patients with MO (p < 0.05). b Significant differences between patients with NL and NAFLD (p < 0.05). c Significant differences between patients with NL and SS (p < 0.05). d Significant differences between patients with NL and NASH (p < 0.05).
Figure 1(A) Serum levels of pro-NT in women with NW and women with MO. (B) Serum levels of pro-NT in diabetic women with MO and non-diabetic women with MO. (C) Serum levels of pro-NT in women with MO and NL vs. NAFLD. (D) Serum levels of pro-NT in women with MO and NL vs. SS vs. NASH. NW, normal weight; MO, morbid obesity; NL; normal liver; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; SS, simple steatosis; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. * p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Figure 2Differential mRNA hepatic expression of (A) SREBP2, (B) ABCG1c, (C) CROT, (D) FAS, (E) LXRα, (F) PPARδ, and (G) PPARγ between NL vs. NAFLD groups and between NL, SS, and NASH groups. NL; normal liver; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; SS, simple steatosis; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; SREBP2, sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2; ABCG1c, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter 1c; CROT, carnitine O-octanoyltransferase; FAS, fatty acid synthase; LXRα, liver X receptor alpha; PPARδ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta and PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 are considered statistically significant.
Figure 3Correlation between plasma pro-NT and LDLc levels. Pro-NT, pro-neurotensin; LDLc, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.