| Literature DB >> 34200392 |
Oriele Palumbo1, Adriano Cimini1, Francesco Trequattrini1,2, Jean-Blaise Brubach3, Pascale Roy3, Annalisa Paolone1.
Abstract
Knowledge of all the intermolecular forces occurring in ionicEntities:
Keywords: DFT calculations; hydrogen bonding; infrared spectroscopy; ionicliquids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34200392 PMCID: PMC8201385 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22116155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Scheme of the cation and anion composing the investigated ionic liquids with labels of the C atoms of the imidazolium ring.
Figure 2Lowest energy ionic couples composing the four ionic liquids, calculated by DFT using the ωB97X-D functional and considering the presence of a polar solvent (εr = 37.22); in all cases the 6-31G** basis set was employed. The dotted lines show the closest H-O bonds for each.
Distance between the closest H atom of the cation and O atom of the anion and CHO angle in various ion pair calculated by DFT by the ωB97X-D functional and considering the presence of a polar solvent.
| Ion Pair | (H-O) (Å) | Angle(C-H-O) (°) |
|---|---|---|
| EMI-MS | 2.08 | 152.2 |
| BMIM-MS | 2.10 | 166.1 |
| EMI-TfO | 2.23 | 136.6 |
| DMEI-TFSI | 2.48 | 122.0 |
Figure 3Absorbance of EMI-MS between 550 and 700 cm−1 measured on heating. The curves are vertically shifted for reasons of clarity.
Figure 4Absorbance of EMI-TfO measured on heating between 180 and 550 cm−1. The curves are vertically shifted for reasons of clarity.
Figure 5Absorbance of BMIM-MS measured on heating between 600 and 680 cm−1. The curves are vertically shifted for reasons of clarity.
Figure 6Absorbance of DMEI-TFSI measured on heating between 550 and 700 cm−1. The curves are vertically shifted for reasons of clarity.
Figure 7Far infrared experimental spectra of the samples DMEI-TFSI (blue lines), EMI-TfO (green lines), EMI-MS (red lines) and BMIM-MS (purple lines) measured at the highest temperature (top) and at 160 K (middle). For BMIM-MS the spectrum measured at 260 K is also shown (black dash line). The calculated spectra for all four ionic couples are presented in the bottom part of the figure.
Calculated ΔH obtained from the linear fit regression of ln(r) vs. 1/T.
| Sample | ΔH bending (kJ/mol−1) | ΔH stretching (kJ/mol−1) |
|---|---|---|
| EMI-TfO | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 5.2 ± 0.3 |
| EMI-MS | 8.4 ± 0.4 | 7.0 ± 0.4 |
| BMIM-MS | 7.2 ± 2.3 | 7.9 ± 4.0 |
Figure 8Logarithm of the ratio of intensities of hydrogen-bonding band to the dispersion-governed configurations band and best fit lines, as a function of temperature. EMI-TfO: blue circles;EMI-MS: red circles; BMIM-MS: green circles. Full symbols refer to ratio obtained considering the bending modes for the hydrogen bond-governed configurations, open symbols refer to ratio obtained considering the stretching modes.