Literature DB >> 34200372

ACE2-Independent Interaction of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein with Human Epithelial Cells Is Inhibited by Unfractionated Heparin.

Lynda J Partridge1, Lucy Urwin2, Martin J H Nicklin2, David C James3, Luke R Green2, Peter N Monk2.   

Abstract

Coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-2, which is responsible for COVID-19, depend on virus spike protein binding to host cell receptors to cause infection. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds primarily to ACE2 on target cells and is then processed by membrane proteases, including TMPRSS2, leading to viral internalisation or fusion with the plasma membrane. It has been suggested, however, that receptors other than ACE2 may be involved in virus binding. We have investigated the interactions of recombinant versions of the spike protein with human epithelial cell lines that express low/very low levels of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in a proxy assay for interaction with host cells. A tagged form of the spike protein containing the S1 and S2 regions bound in a temperature-dependent manner to all cell lines, whereas the S1 region alone and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) interacted only weakly. Spike protein associated with cells independently of ACE2 and TMPRSS2, while RBD required the presence of high levels of ACE2 for interaction. As the spike protein has previously been shown to bind heparin, a soluble glycosaminoglycan, we tested the effects of various heparins on ACE2-independent spike protein interaction with cells. Unfractionated heparin inhibited spike protein interaction with an IC50 value of <0.05 U/mL, whereas two low-molecular-weight heparins were less effective. A mutant form of the spike protein, lacking the arginine-rich putative furin cleavage site, interacted only weakly with cells and had a lower affinity for unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin than the wild-type spike protein. This suggests that the furin cleavage site might also be a heparin-binding site and potentially important for interactions with host cells. The glycosaminoglycans heparan sulphate and dermatan sulphate, but not chondroitin sulphate, also inhibited the binding of spike protein, indicating that it might bind to one or both of these glycosaminoglycans on the surface of target cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SARS-CoV-2; glycosaminoglycan; heparin; spike protein

Year:  2021        PMID: 34200372     DOI: 10.3390/cells10061419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cells        ISSN: 2073-4409            Impact factor:   6.600


  15 in total

Review 1.  Is heparan sulfate a target for inhibition of RNA virus infection?

Authors:  Jiaxin Ling; Jinlin Li; Asifa Khan; Åke Lundkvist; Jin-Ping Li
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.249

2.  The interplay between lncRNAs, RNA-binding proteins and viral genome during SARS-CoV-2 infection reveals strong connections with regulatory events involved in RNA metabolism and immune response.

Authors:  Francisco J Enguita; Ana Lúcia Leitão; J Tyson McDonald; Viktorija Zaksas; Saswati Das; Diego Galeano; Deanne Taylor; Eve Syrkin Wurtele; Amanda Saravia-Butler; Stephen B Baylin; Robert Meller; D Marshall Porterfield; Douglas C Wallace; Jonathan C Schisler; Christopher E Mason; Afshin Beheshti
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 11.600

3.  Horizons of Heparin Therapy in COVID-19 and Pandemic-Related Diseases.

Authors:  M V Kondashevskaya
Journal:  J Evol Biochem Physiol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  A glycosaminoglycan microarray identifies the binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to chondroitin sulfate E.

Authors:  Tomoko Watanabe; Ko Takeda; Keiko Hiemori; Toshikazu Minamisawa; Hiroaki Tateno
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.864

Review 5.  Adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: the spike hypothesis.

Authors:  Ioannis P Trougakos; Evangelos Terpos; Harry Alexopoulos; Marianna Politou; Dimitrios Paraskevis; Andreas Scorilas; Efstathios Kastritis; Evangelos Andreakos; Meletios A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 15.272

6.  Concerns over functional experiments, interpretation, and required controls. Reply.

Authors:  Wan-Chen Hsieh; Shih-Yu Chen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  The Musculoskeletal Involvement After Mild to Moderate COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Patty K Dos Santos; Emilly Sigoli; Lorenna J G Bragança; Anabelle S Cornachione
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Discovery of Highly Potent Fusion Inhibitors with Potential Pan-Coronavirus Activity That Effectively Inhibit Major COVID-19 Variants of Concern (VOCs) in Pseudovirus-Based Assays.

Authors:  Francesca Curreli; Shahad Ahmed; Sofia M B Victor; Aleksandra Drelich; Siva S Panda; Andrea Altieri; Alexander V Kurkin; Chien-Te K Tseng; Christopher D Hillyer; Asim K Debnath
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Activity of Rhamnan Sulfate from Monostroma nitidum.

Authors:  Yuefan Song; Peng He; Andre L Rodrigues; Payel Datta; Ritesh Tandon; John T Bates; Michael A Bierdeman; Chen Chen; Jonathan Dordick; Fuming Zhang; Robert J Linhardt
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 10.  The SARS-CoV-2 Entry Inhibition Mechanisms of Serine Protease Inhibitors, OM-85, Heparin and Soluble HS Might Be Linked to HS Attachment Sites.

Authors:  Antony Cheudjeu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.