Literature DB >> 34200351

Sex Differences in Spatial Memory: Comparison of Three Tasks Using the Same Virtual Context.

Laura Tascón1, Carmen Di Cicco2, Laura Piccardi3,4, Massimiliano Palmiero2, Alessia Bocchi2,3, José Manuel Cimadevilla5,6.   

Abstract

Spatial memory has been studied through different instruments and tools with different modalities of administration. The cognitive load varies depending on the measure used and it should be taken into account to correctly interpret results. The aim of this research was to analyze how men and women perform three different spatial memory tasks with the same spatial context but with different cognitive demands. A total of 287 undergraduate students from the University of Almeria (Spain) and the University of L'Aquila (Italy) participated in the study. They were divided into three groups balanced by sex according to the spatial memory test they performed: the Walking Space Boxes Room Task (WSBRT), the Almeria Spatial Memory Recognition Test (ASMRT) and the Non-Walking Space Boxes Room Task (NWSBRT). Time spent and number of errors/correct answers were registered for analysis. In relation to the WSBRT and the ASMRT, men were faster and reached the optimal level of performance before women. In the three tests, familiarity with the spatial context helped to reduce the number of errors, regardless of the level of difficulty. In conclusion, sex differences were determined by the familiarity with the spatial context, the difficulty level of the task, the active or passive role of the participant and the amount of visual information provided in each screen shot.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive load; dimorphism; sex differences; spatial navigation; spatial orientation; spatial tests; virtual reality

Year:  2021        PMID: 34200351     DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11060757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Sci        ISSN: 2076-3425


  3 in total

1.  Walking on a minefield: planning, remembering, and avoiding obstacles: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Bocchi Alessia; Palmiero Massimiliano; Piccardi Laura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Development of Landmark Use for Navigation in Children: Effects of Age, Sex, Working Memory and Landmark Type.

Authors:  Anne H van Hoogmoed; Joost Wegman; Danielle van den Brink; Gabriele Janzen
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-13

3.  Prepubescent female rodents have enhanced hippocampal LTP and learning relative to males, reversing in adulthood as inhibition increases.

Authors:  Aliza A Le; Julie C Lauterborn; Yousheng Jia; Weisheng Wang; Conor D Cox; Christine M Gall; Gary Lynch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 28.771

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.