Literature DB >> 34199796

Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel versus FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A European Multicenter Study.

Nicolas Williet1, Angelica Petrillo2, Gaël Roth3, Michele Ghidini4, Mila Petrova5, Julien Forestier6, Anthony Lopez7, Audrey Thoor3, Lucie Weislinger7, Ferdinando De Vita2, Julien Taieb8, Jean Marc Phelip1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GN) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are two standard first-line therapies for metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) but have rarely been compared, especially in patients with locally advanced PC (LAPC).
METHODS: This is a retrospective European multicenter study including patients with LAPC treated with either GN or FFX as the first-line therapy between 2010 and 2019. Coprimary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), both estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: A total of 147 patients (GN: n = 60; FFX: n = 87) were included. Tumor resection rates were similar between the two groups (16.7% vs. 16.1%; p = 1), with similar R0 resection rates (88.9%). Median PFS rates were not statistically different: 9 months (95% CI: 8-13.5) vs. 12.1 months (95% CI: 10.1-14.6; p = 0.8), respectively. Median OS rates were 15.7 months (95% CI: 12.6-20.2) and 16.7 months (95% CI: 14.8-20.4; p = 0.7), respectively. Abdominal pain at the baseline (HR = 2.03, p = 0.03), tumors located in the tail of the pancreas (HR = 4.35, p = 0.01), CA19-9 > 200 UI/L (HR = 2.03, p = 0.004) and tumor resection (HR = 0.37, p = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for PFS, similarly to OS. CA19-9 ≤ 200 UI/L (OR = 2.6, p = 0.047) was predictive of the tumor response. Consolidation chemoradiotherapy, more often used in the FFX group (11.7% vs. 50.6%; p < 0.001), was not predictive.
CONCLUSION: This retrospective study did not show any difference between GN and FFX as the first-line treatment in patients with LAPC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FOLFIRINOX; gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel; pancreatic cancer; predictors of response; prognostic factors

Year:  2021        PMID: 34199796     DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  3 in total

1.  Finding a role for cancer vaccines in pancreatic cancer: a model of resilience.

Authors:  Gentry King; Steven Green; E Gabriela Chiorean
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Pancreatic Cancer with Mutation in BRCA1/2, MLH1, and APC Genes: Phenotype Correlation and Detection of a Novel Germline BRCA2 Mutation.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Vietri; Giovanna D'Elia; Gemma Caliendo; Luisa Albanese; Giuseppe Signoriello; Claudio Napoli; Anna Maria Molinari
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Enhanced CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling increases tumor progression in radiation‑resistant pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Tomokatsu Kato; Yoichi Matsuo; Goro Ueda; Hiromichi Murase; Yoshinaga Aoyama; Kan Omi; Yuichi Hayashi; Hiroyuki Imafuji; Kenta Saito; Mamoru Morimoto; Ryo Ogawa; Hiroki Takahashi; Shuji Takiguchi
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.906

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.