| Literature DB >> 34199453 |
Ian Tannenbaum1,2, Brendan Rodoni1,2, German Spangenberg1,2, Ross Mann1, Tim Sawbridge1,2.
Abstract
Research into the bacterial component of the seed microbiome has been intensifying, with the aim of understanding its structure and potential for exploitation. We previously studied the intergenerational seed microbiome of one cultivar of perennial ryegrass with and without one strain of the commercially deployed fungal endophyte Epichloë festucae var. lolii. The work described here expands on our previous study by exploring the bacterial seed microbiome of different commercial cultivar/Epichloë festucae var. lolii combinations in collections of single seeds from the harvest year 2016. In this dataset, a cultivar effect could be seen between the seed microbiomes from cultivars Alto and Trojan. The bacterial component of the seed microbiome from pooled seeds from a single cultivar/E. festucae var. lolii combination harvested from 13 seed production farms around Canterbury in the year 2018 was also studied. This dataset allows the effect of different production locations on the bacterial seed microbiome to be examined. By comparing the two sets of data, bacteria from the genera Pantoea, Pseudomonas, Duganella, Massilia, and an unknown Enterobacteriaceae were observed to be in common. This core bacterial microbiome was stable over time but could be affected by supplemental taxa derived from the growth environment of the parental plant; differing microbiomes were seen between different seed production farms. By comparison to a collection of bacterial isolates, we demonstrated that many of the members of the core microbiome were culturable. This allows for the possibility of exploiting these microbes in the future.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Lolium perenne; biogeography; endophytes; metagenomics; microbial diversity; microbiome; seed
Year: 2021 PMID: 34199453 PMCID: PMC8228030 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9061205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Cultivar/E. festucae var. lolii combinations of L. perenne Single Seed accessions.
| Cultivar | Fungal Endophyte | KASP | Number of Seedlings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alto | AR1 | + | 6 |
| − | 6 | ||
| AR37 | + | 5 | |
| − | 5 | ||
| SE | + | 6 | |
| − | 2 | ||
| WE | NA | 6 | |
| Trojan | AR37 | + | 6 |
| − | 6 |
The biogeographical locations of Biogeography Seed accessions.
| Species | Cultivar | Source | Location |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Trojan | 20008 | Dawsons Rd, Ashburton |
| 20040 | Surveyors Rd, Ashburton | ||
| 20052 | Wards Rd, Aylesbury | ||
| 20057 | Hinds River Rd, Ashburton | ||
| 20076 | Longbeach Rd, Ashburton | ||
| 20090 | Terrace Rd, Ashburton | ||
| 20094 | Pooles Rd, Ashburton | ||
| 20111 | Pendarves Rakaia Rd, Ashburton | ||
| 20121 | Winslow Rd, Ashburton | ||
| 20129 | Milford, Temuka | ||
| 20142 | Grahams Rd, Ashburton | ||
| 20184 | Hoskyns Rd, Kirwee | ||
| 20185 | Hoskyns Rd, Kirwee |
Figure 1Approximate biogeographical locations of each Biogeography Seed accession.
Figure 2Jaccard similarity plots demonstrating the differences between Single Seeds; Trojan (cyan) and Alto (magenta) rings.
Figure 3A comparison of genus level profiles of 41 dominant OTUs that each accounted for >1% of the total number of reads from Single Seeds.
Figure 4Jaccard similarity plots demonstrating a geographical effect on the Biogeography Seed microbiomes; Ashburton (central, blue), Aylesbury (north, red), Temuka (south, orange), and Kirwee (north, green) rings.
Figure 5Estimated Shannon alpha diversity indexes between Biogeography Seed.
Figure 6A comparison of genus level profiles of 39 OTUs that each accounted for >1% of the total number of reads from the Biogeography Seed.
Figure 7The number of shared and supplemental OTUs between the Single Seeds (SS)—2015–2016 and the Biogeography Seed (BG)—2018.
Figure 8Comparison of the contribution of the 38 shared OTUs from Biogeography Seeds (a) and from Single Seeds (b).
Mapping of the 14 Rank 1 OTUs against isolates obtained from Lolium perenne.
| Homology to Isolates | Any Rank (% of Reps) | Rank 1 (% of Reps) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU | Name | 97% | 100% | NZ | SS | NZ | SS |
| OTU_1 | g_Pantoea |
| 100% | 100% | 54% | 40% | |
| OTU_2 | g_Duganella | 99% | 85% | 6% | 6% | ||
| OTU_3 | g_Pseudomonas_6 |
|
| 51% | 81% | 2% | 11% |
| OTU_4 | g_Allo-Neo-Para-Rhizobium |
|
| 91% | 79% | 1% | 0% |
| OTU_5 | g_Massilia |
| 99% | 77% | 3% | 2% | |
| OTU_6 | f_Enterobacteriaceae_1 |
|
| 43% | 75% | 6% | 6% |
| OTU_7 | g_Pseudomonas_5 |
|
| 0% | 58% | 0% | 4% |
| OTU_8 | g_Pseudomonas_2 |
| 3% | 52% | 1% | 17% | |
| OTU_9 | f_Burkholderiaceae |
| 0% | 48% | 0% | 2% | |
| OTU_10 | g_Pseudomonas_4 |
| 100% | 40% | 8% | 0% | |
| OTU_11 | g_Flavobacterium | 13% | 38% | 0% | 2% | ||
| OTU_12 | g_Pseudomonas_1 |
| 85% | 33% | 11% | 0% | |
| OTU_13 | g_Pseudomonas_3 |
| 25% | 29% | 3% | 9% | |
| OTU_14 | f_Enterobacteriaceae_2 |
| 22% | 0% | 3% | 0% | |
Identification made using full length 16S rRNA and is closely related to Pantoea.