| Literature DB >> 34199227 |
Mario Jojoa Acosta1, Gema Castillo-Sánchez2, Begonya Garcia-Zapirain1, Isabel de la Torre Díez2, Manuel Franco-Martín3,4.
Abstract
The use of artificial intelligence in health care has grown quickly. In this sense, we present our work related to the application of Natural Language Processing techniques, as a tool to analyze the sentiment perception of users who answered two questions from the CSQ-8 questionnaires with raw Spanish free-text. Their responses are related to mindfulness, which is a novel technique used to control stress and anxiety caused by different factors in daily life. As such, we proposed an online course where this method was applied in order to improve the quality of life of health care professionals in COVID 19 pandemic times. We also carried out an evaluation of the satisfaction level of the participants involved, with a view to establishing strategies to improve future experiences. To automatically perform this task, we used Natural Language Processing (NLP) models such as swivel embedding, neural networks, and transfer learning, so as to classify the inputs into the following three categories: negative, neutral, and positive. Due to the limited amount of data available-86 registers for the first and 68 for the second-transfer learning techniques were required. The length of the text had no limit from the user's standpoint, and our approach attained a maximum accuracy of 93.02% and 90.53%, respectively, based on ground truth labeled by three experts. Finally, we proposed a complementary analysis, using computer graphic text representation based on word frequency, to help researchers identify relevant information about the opinions with an objective approach to sentiment. The main conclusion drawn from this work is that the application of NLP techniques in small amounts of data using transfer learning is able to obtain enough accuracy in sentiment analysis and text classification stages.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; CSQ-8; IMDB; deep learning; embedding; mindfulness; natural language processing; neural networks; stress; swivel
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34199227 PMCID: PMC8296222 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Survey based on Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8).
| ID | Question | Answers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Item 0 | Professional health care category | ||
| Age | Expressed as a number | ||
| Sex | Female | ||
| Place of work | |||
| Item 1 | 1. How would you rate the quality of the online emotional mindfulness support service received? | Excellent | |
| Good | |||
| Average | |||
| Poor | |||
| Item 2 | 2. Did you receive the type of support you required? | Definitely not | |
| Item 3 | 3. To what extent has this program helped you solve your problems? | Almost entirely | |
| Item 4 | 4. If a friend needed similar help, would you recommend this program to them? | Definitely not | |
| Item 5 | 5. How satisfied are you with the amount of help you have received? | Not satisfied at all | |
| Item 6 | 6. Have the services you received helped you deal better with your problems? | Yes, they helped me a lot | |
| Item 7 | 7. Generally speaking, how satisfied are you with the services you have received? | Very satisfied | |
| Item 8 | 8. If you needed help again, would you return to our program? | Definitely not | |
| Item 9 | 9. About the course: [You think the duration of the course might have been too short] [The degree of privacy and respect for intimacy was considered and complied with] [I felt comfortable during therapy] [You think the duration of the intervention might have been too short] [The online system was easy to use] [Owing to your experience as a health care professional, you consider the program to be suitable and a similar program should be offered to those affected by Covid-19 and/or their family members] [Owing to your experience with the pandemic, and if there were another similar situation, you think a program like this should be promoted] | I completely agree | |
| Item 10 | 10. Comparing face-to-face with online intervention, if you had to choose and in light of the experience gained, what would be your preferences (Five [ | 1 | Online |
| 10 | Face to-face | ||
| Item 11 | Optional: | Open responses | |
Figure 1Histograms for the set of data corresponding to the question “Share with us what you most liked about the attention received”.
Figure 2Histograms for the set of data corresponding to the question “Share your suggestions and recommendations for improvement with us”.
Figure 3Block diagram of the Natural Language Processing model proposed.
Figure 4Outline of the proposal using MLP1.
Figure 5Outline of the proposal using MLP2.
Hyperparameters of the proposed model.
| Hyperparameters | Values |
|---|---|
| Number of Hidden Layers | 1–2 |
| Activation Function of Hidden Layers | RELU |
| Number of Neurons of the Hidden Layers | 1–20 |
Figure 6Flow chart of the decision block used to determine text sentiment.
Performance metrics obtained using the classification models proposed.
| Model | Dataset | Positive | Mean Positive—Neutral Threshold | Mean Neutral—Negative Threshold | Negative | Mean Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLP1 | Question 1 | 1 | 0 | −0.5 | −1 | 93.02% |
| MLP1 | Question 2 | 1 | 0 | −0.1 | −1 | 72.05% |
| MLP2 | Question 1 | 1 | 0 | −0.4 | −1 | 90.53% |
| MLP2 | Question 2 | 1 | 0 | −0.22 | −1 | 70.25% |
Confusion matrix obtained for the set of responses to question 1 using the MLP1 model proposed.
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 78 | 2 | 0 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.96 | |
|
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.29 | |
|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.67 | |
Confusion matrix obtained for the set of responses to question 2 using the MLP1 model proposed.
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 46 | 13 | 5 | 0.72 | 0.98 | 0.83 | |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | |
|
| 1 | 0 | 3 | 0.75 | 0.38 | 0.50 | |
Confusion matrix obtained for the set of responses to question 1 using the MLP2 model proposed.
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 70 | 2 | 0 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 0.91 | |
|
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.29 | |
|
| 9 | 0 | 1 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 0.18 | |
Confusion matrix obtained for the set of responses to question 2 using the MLP2 model proposed.
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 39 | 5 | 5 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.81 | |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | |
|
| 8 | 8 | 3 | 0.16 | 0.38 | 0.22 | |
Figure 7Learning graph for the MLP1 model with regard to the accuracy metric.
Figure 8Learning graph for the MLP2 model with regard to the accuracy metric.
Figure 9Flow chart of the decision block to determine text sentiment.
Figure 10Flow chart of the decision block to determine text sentiment.
Figure 11Infographic for the text analyzed corresponding to open question 1 from the data gathering information.
Figure 12Infographic for the text analyzed corresponding to open question 2.
Register of the Mindfulness Course in times of the Covid-19 Pandemic.
| ID | Question | Answers |
|---|---|---|
| Item 0 | Valid email | |
| Name and surname(s) | Text | |
| Age | Expressed as a number | |
| Sex | Female | |
| Post | Nurse | |
| 1 | Awareness of the program and type of contact: | By email |
| 2 | Current work situation (regarding COVID-19): | Active |
| 3 | Reason for the request | Anxiety |
| 4 | Reason for main concern about Covid-19 | Work-related stress |