| Literature DB >> 34198481 |
Abstract
Current evidence and research of the life course approach on the association between life experiences and health in old age are fragmentary. This paper empirically examines the "long arm" effect of the childhood circumstances on mental health in later life using a large longitudinal dataset (CHARLS) conducted in 2014 and 2015. We operationalize the childhood circumstances as family economic conditions, community environment, and peer network to include the meaningful content and understand their interaction. The SEM results indicate that effects of those factors contributing to older people's mental health are unequal and vary among age groups and genders. Of those, peer network in childhood determines to a large extent the mental health through the whole life course, while economic conditions and community environment are weakly associated with mental health. Furthermore, we find a distinct interaction mechanism linking those variables. The peer network completely mediates the effect of the community environment on the mental health of older adults and has a partial mediating effect on the economic conditions. Those findings suggest that social policies aimed at promoting older people's mental health in the context of the active ageing and health ageing strategy should go beyond the old age stage and target social conditions early in childhood.Entities:
Keywords: active ageing; childhood circumstances; life course; mental health; population ageing
Year: 2021 PMID: 34198481 PMCID: PMC8296235 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126420
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Path model of the relationships between earlier experience and later mental health.
Descriptive statistics (N = 9750).
| Variables | Value Description | Mean | SD | Min | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Numerical variable | 31.83 | 6.59 | 10 | 40 | |
| Economic | FE | 1 = No; 0 = Yes | 0.15 | 0.36 | 0 | 1 |
| FF | 1 = No; 0 = Yes | 0.92 | 0.27 | 0 | 1 | |
| DS | 1 = No; 0 = Yes | 0.89 | 0.32 | 0 | 1 | |
| Community Environment | SN | 1 = Not safe at all; | 3.41 | 0.69 | 1 | 4 |
| NH | 1 = Not willing to at all; | 3.31 | 0.79 | 1 | 4 | |
| HN | 1 = Not close-knit at all; | 3.38 | 0.61 | 1 | 4 | |
| CC | 1 = Not clean at all; | 2.68 | 0.79 | 1 | 4 | |
| Peer | LF | 1 = Often; 4 = Never | 3.61 | 0.86 | 1 | 4 |
| GF | 1 = Never; 4 = Often | 3.25 | 1.11 | 1 | 4 | |
| BK | 1 = Never; 4 = Often | 3.60 | 0.80 | 1 | 4 | |
| Control | Gender | 1 = Male; 0 = Female | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0 | 1 |
| Age | Numerical variable | 62.99 | 5.43 | 54 | 74 | |
| Health status | 1 = Healthy; 0 = Unhealthy | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0 | 1 | |
| Hukou | 1 = Rural; 0 = Urban | 0.23 | 0.42 | 0 | 1 | |
| Marital status | 1 = Married; 0 = Unmarried | 0.99 | 0.09 | 0 | 1 | |
| Education | 1 = High school and above; | 0.14 | 0.35 | 0 | 1 | |
| Log of income | Numerical variable | 6.66 | 2.94 | 0.69 | 11.25 |
Notes: The full name of the abbreviation of the measured variables are shown in parentheses. FE (starvation experience), FF (experience of flee from famine), DS (experience of relatives’ death from starvation), SN (safety being out alone at night in the neighborhood), NH (neighbors in the community helping each other), HN (harmony among neighbors), CC (cleanliness of the community), LF (loneliness due to the lack of friends), GF (a group of friends), and BK (being bullied by kids).
Figure 2Column chart of ten indicator variables.
Model maximum likelihood estimation results.
| Model | Coefficients | S.E. | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Economic Conditions → Community Environment | 0.187 | 0.025 | ** | |
| Economic Conditions → Peer Relationship | 0.363 | 0.035 | *** | |
| Community Environment → Peer Relationship | 0.520 | 0.024 | *** | |
| Economic Conditions → Mental Health | 0.094 | 0.030 | *** | |
| Community Environment → Mental Health | −0.037 | 0.027 | 0.177 | |
| Peer Relationship → Mental Health | 0.316 | 0.038 | *** | |
|
| ||||
| Economic Conditions | FE | 0.256 | 0.020 | *** |
| FF | 0.214 | 0.020 | *** | |
| DS | 0.487 | 0.030 | *** | |
| Community Environment | SN | 0.371 | 0.012 | *** |
| HN | 0.716 | 0.010 | *** | |
| NH | 0.740 | 0.010 | *** | |
| CC | 0.220 | 0.013 | *** | |
| Peer Relationship | LF | 0.435 | 0.017 | *** |
| GF | 0.372 | 0.015 | *** | |
| BK | 0.364 | 0.015 | *** | |
|
| ||||
| RMSEA = 0.035; CFI = 0.940; TLI = 0.915; χ2 = 6338.974 | ||||
Note: *** and ** represent 1% and 5% significance, respectively.
Direct, indirect, and total effects of the model.
| Factors | Paths | Coefficients |
|---|---|---|
| Economic Conditions | Direct effect | 0.094 |
| Indirect effect | 0.146 | |
| Total effect | 0.240 | |
| Community Environment | Indirect effect/Total effect | 0.164 |
| Peer Relationship | Direct effect/Total effect | 0.316 |
Multi-group comparison by age cohort.
| Age Cohort | 54–59 | 60–64 | 65–69 | 70+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic conditions → mental health | 0.154(0.05) ** | 0.131(0.06) ** | 0.037(0.04) | 0.049(0.07) |
| Community environment → mental health | 0.015(0.04) | −0.012(0.05) | −0.069(0.05) | −0.100(0.09) |
| Peer relationship → mental health | 0.251(0.06) *** | 0.201(0.08) *** | 0.393(0.06) *** | 0.462(0.11) *** |
| Economic conditions → peer relationship | 0.410(0.06) *** | 0.402(0.07) *** | 0.231(0.06) *** | 0.309(0.08) *** |
| Economic conditions → community environment | 0.148(0.05) ** | 0.253(0.05) *** | 0.145(0.04) *** | 0.090(0.05) |
| Community environment → peer relationship | 0.480(0.04) *** | 0.516(0.05) *** | 0.558(0.04) *** | 0.574(0.06) *** |
| N | 3564 | 3112 | 2274 | 1430 |
Note: *** and ** represent 1% and 5% significance, respectively.
Multi-group comparison by gender.
| Gender Cohort | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|
| Economic conditions → mental health | 0.070(0.043) | 0.122(0.042) ** |
| Community environment → mental health | −0.044(−0.044) | −0.100(0.045) |
| Peer relationship → mental health | 0.359(0.049) *** | 0.316(0.060) *** |
| Economic conditions → peer relationship | 0.389(0.049) *** | 0.338(0.051) *** |
| Economic conditions → community environment | 0.228(0.035) *** | 0.150(0.035) *** |
| Community environment → peer relationship | 0.458(0.033) *** | 0.577(0.035) *** |
| N | 4915 | 4835 |
Note: *** and ** represent 1% and 5% significance, respectively.